ipl-logo

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

1029 Words5 Pages

Standardized testing has become a big part of students’ lives in the United States in every states(excluding 5 of them). Ever since the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, students starting from grades 3 until 8 are required to take a reading and math standardized test. According to the Huffington Post, $1.7 billion are spent every year to fund these tests. This is a large sum of money spent on testing, testing that is very disadvantageous. Standardized testing creates stress for everyone, students, teacher, and parents. The last thing any student want to feel before taking an exam is stress, a great deal of it. As I students myself, I know how it feels when my teachers pass out the booklets and bubble sheets. The only thing on my mind would be questions about how I would perform on this test, making it very hard to read each question and answer it to the best of my abilities. Because the standardized test is very important, students are pressure to perform well on them. This pressure to perform …show more content…

Before the No Child Left Behind Act was passed, America was ranked 15 is reading and 17 in math. That was in 2000. After 7 years of standardized testing, America ranking hasn't improved, instead, it dropped. In 2009, America's reading rank dropped to a 17 while the math rank plundered down to 31. In the 2012 PISA, America still hasn't improved. There was decrease of 7 positions in reading and a decrease of 5 positions in math. If you compare the 2000 rank to 2012 rank, 15 to 24 and 17 to 36, the gap between the 2000 rank and 2012 rank is quite huge. So for those who argue standardized testing is helping America rank higher in the PISA, clearly we haven't even moved one rank up with standardized testing. America had only dropped, a long fall

Open Document