Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Asset forfeiture cons
Upon his arrival one of the officers showed Chimel the arrest warrant and asked if he could look around, Chimel objected and in the short of it said no. Even with him objecting the officers read Chimel his rights and then continued to look around the small house, garage, and workshop. In the main bedroom of Chimel home the officers found coins, medals, and tokens in the dresser drawer. Chimel was arrested and the items were placed into evidence, were he would be tried on two charges of burglary. Legal Question: When issued
Id. Id. Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125 (D.C. 2001). Id. at 145. When only one person is in possible constructive possession, it “then also becomes relevant to know the period of time during which the person has been in "exclusive" proximity, and evidence that others may have been responsible for the contraband's presence may render the situation just as ambiguous as when more than one person is present.” Id. at 145 n.22.
In this type of fraud the assets are attained lawfully and the embezzler has the right to possess them, but the assets are then used for unintended purposes. Embezzlement is a breach of the fiduciary responsibilities placed upon
Evidence was even reported to being stored in places other than vaults, such as nearby bathrooms. Every piece of evidence tossed or lost leads to another case left unsolvable. This will just keep on happening, though, because The Denver Post revealed that there were no state or local laws surrounding this issue (Greene). The goal of the series was to expose this little-known issue to the public. More importantly, it was to bring justice to both victims with unsolvable cases and those who were wrongly imprisoned and are unable to prove their innocence (Greene).
I have read your case, and I am deeply sorry for what happened to your property at the Greensboro Coliseum parking lot. Since you paid the Greensboro Coliseum for the parking lot fee and they were responsible to watch out your asset while you were away, the bailment agreement was established. Due to that, I have some information relating to the bailment relationship and the rights as well as liabilities for both parties, you and the Greensboro Coliseum, in this relationship. According to Investopedia, bailment is defined as “the contractual transfer of possession of assets or property for a specific objective.
To put it in a simple way, bail is the refundable exchange of cash, bond, or property between the court and the arrestee in return of the freedom of the arrestee until the trial date. [1] Bail exists not for the courts to make money but to allow arrestees who are in jail awaiting trial for a non-capital crime an opportunity to go back to their communities while leaving a personal interest with the court. [2] The personal interest that the arrestee left with the court will ensure that the arrestee will come back to the court on the trial date and not flee. [2] In felonies and some misdemeanors allowing an offender the privilege to pay a bail and go free until trial is up to the discretion of the judge, if for some reason the judge suspects that
Back in the 19th century members were appointed to office using the spoils system, which pretty much means after winning an election, the political party or president gives government jobs to its supporters, friends, and relatives as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. After people became fed up with the spoils system and a disappointed officer assassinated President Garfield they started using the merits system. The merits system is the process of promoting and hiring government employees based on their ability to perform a job, rather than on political connections. The spoils system was developed about 150 years ago.
If you have ever had a debt that you were not able to pay, it may feel like it will never go away. Fortunately, lenders can 't collect on debts that are beyond their statute of limitations. The only debts that have no statue of limitations are income tax debt, federal student loans and child support. Prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations for a debt, a creditor may use the court system in order to extract payment from you.
The U.S. Marshal Service also locates and arrest fugitives. The U.S. Marshals arrested over 40,000 fugitives in 2010. The U.S. Marshal Service also looks over more than 58,000 prisoners in the prison throughout the nation. One major thing that the U.S. Marshal service does in the U.S. is seizing stolen or illegally owned property. By them seizing the illegally owned property they bring in almost $1.8 billion dollars in revenue every year to the department.
Asset forfeiture makes communities safer by enhancing critical law enforcement efforts and supporting regional law enforcement task forces. This tactic keeps criminals at bay by reducing the criminals source of trade. By taking away that sources, whether it be drugs, illegal weapons, etc…, there will be a decrease in the chance of that contraband ending up in the streets of our communities. Civil-asset forfeiture also assists with the drug problem in the United States, by allowing law enforcement agencies to confiscate any illegal drug from the criminal, to prevent it ending up in innocent communities. By keeping drugs and organized crime at bay, civil-asset forfeiture is able to decrease the amount of criminal activity which will allow the youth to be less susceptible to
"Drop Dead " which is what some lawyers are describing Statute of Limitation Because, a case is dead if not filed by the deadline. Statute of Limitations are laws that set the deadlines for filling lawsuits in civil cases and for filling formal charges in criminal cases. Statute of Limitation is fair for both Plaintiff and the Defendant because, it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals, diminish unreliable cases over time,help to create a level playing field for plaintiffs and defendants. To begin with, Statute of Limitations is fair for both Plaintiff and Defendant because it helps to ensure fairness in legal disputes between individuals. According to the article it stated "If the law failed to provide a deadline, then a person could face a lawsuit decades after an alleged injury happened." which mean it limits the time for filling a lawsuit to allow peace of mind.
Law enforcement’s increased arrest rates affect other criminal justice agencies including prosecutors. The increased arrest rate increases prosecutor’s caseloads. Prosecutor’s caseloads were increased due to legitimate and illegitimate arrests. Due to some officer’s misconduct, prosecutors became suspicious of arrests and were dismissing many of the tagging cases that came from certain blocks. Prosecutors were forced to use their limited time and resources to dismiss the suspicious charges while simultaneously pursuing charges for other legitimate cases.
The seller will defend the title to the property against all claims. 3) The seller is “seized of the fee” in the real estate meaning that the seller warrants (guarantees) that they own all rights in the property. 4) There are no encumbrances against the real estate that are not listed in the
The abuse of power is all around us, and Civil Forfeiture is no exception. The idea behind this process is something that could really help our country, but unfortunately when put in the hands of certain authority figures it loses that privilege and becomes increasingly negative towards American citizens. Of course there are many examples as to how Civil Forfeiture is not used properly, but the most obvious one is the abuse of innocent people. Police do not only target criminals but people who have done nothing to break the law. They do this in order to benefit themselves finically, as particular states have laws in place where the officer gets to keep one hundred percent of the money seized.
Often times assets are moved to a relative or a corporation which is established only to hide assets, therefore, it is important that if you think a debtor is moving assets to stop you from collecting a judgment you need to get