Attachment Theory Vs. Evolutionary Social Psychology

575 Words3 Pages

The psychological perspective on relationships was viewed from an experimental social psychology, evolutionary social psychology, developmental social psychology and health psychology. Willerton (2010) proposes four perspectives, however two will be examined: Evolutionary social psychology and developmental social psychology. Willerton (2010) stated that evolutionary social psychology draws on the idea proposed by Charles Darwin (1871) of natural selection and sexual selection. Our ancestors' behaviours and bodily features were passed on to their offspring and may be present in modern-day men and women. Is it, that from the theory, one can assume that the indiscipline among students at Open Bible High School is based on the evolutionary social psychology? I am not in agreement with the proposed evolutionary theory because it does not align with creationist theory. According to Buss and Kenrick (1998) the rationale behind the evolutionary theory was to give scientific credence to revolt against creationism, the belief that God created different species in the original form as they are …show more content…

It is based on the attachment theory that considers early relationships between children and their caregivers provide a template or internal working models for external relationships. Children who experienced moderately secure attachments during their childhood are more likely to live adult relationships with trust and sense of worth than those with insecure attachments (p. 5). Children's experience of a secure relationship during their childhood reinforces their belief that they are loveable, they understand their worth and that they are valuable. With this understanding, they are capable of extending themselves to relationships that are external to the home