The Controversy Between Evolutionary And Creation

647 Words3 Pages

Evolution can be a difficult concept for people to come to turn with, because it is consider being a scientific testable theory. Evolutionary and Creationist involves a big controversy about cultural, political and theological about the origin of the earth. Evolutionary is accepting well in the scientific community almost ninety-five percent of scientist support evolutionary. We as individual do not understand evolutionary this is said because we do not know it to be a facts or a theory. It is natural for us as individual to promote creationist. It would be no need for criticism if we knew the facts to be valid. Evolutionary is indeed the cornerstone of all modern biology. Evolutionary on the other hand is as if creationist can be several …show more content…

Why astronomy is a religion and why astronomy is not, many believe it is no facts stating evolutionary. There is biochemical, genetic and fossil evidence, of course a lot more. Creationist has not evident whatsoever. Fossil is an extinct marine. We have to first understand fossil s, it is very helpful to learn how they are formed. Taphonomy study plants, animals, and other organism is altered after death, and can be reserved as fossil. People think fossils are mineralized shell stored in the local museum, they feel it could be remains of ancient organism Individual who believe in evolutionary assume to be convinced that fossil is found in rock layers all over the earth, which is consider proof that creation is always been some form of life over hundreds of millions years ago. Evolutionist says, this type of process has taken place through natural selection that left behind its old models. If we as scientist would go out into the field, we would come up with a different conclusion. Therefore, we have to do as the Bible "prove all things" instructs us. There are over 101 viewpoints why Evolutionary to be true. Age of earth and