Banning Books Should Not Be Banned In Schools Essay

448 Words2 Pages

Does Harry Potter encourage students to perform witchcraft? Many parents and adults believed that therefore Harry Potter has become one of the many banned books there are. These books occasionally get permanently banned for outrageous reasons. If we restrict books students and people may never learn lessons, correct history, or develop empathy for others. Books should not be banned in public libraries and schools.

Banned books based on true stories can inspire kids. Most banned books are based on true historical events and talk about how that character overcomes them. This is not only educational for children but can teach them great lessons. The graphic novel, Maus, a story about Jewish parents in the 1930s is a great example of this but has been banned from public schools. ''This story is quite educational and can give students a new perspective of how the parents survived a horrific time. (Emily Davis)''. Banned books can also help people understand history better. If we ban books students may only hear one point of view from history. This can cause history to repeat itself. ''The idea of banning books from school’s curriculum is to protect students from the harsh reality of the books. Taking these books away may hurt the students more than it will actually protect them. (Emily Davis)''. …show more content…

If we ban books children may never understand cultures, people, or places. Books have been proven to help children's minds grow and learn. If we take books away from them they will continue to live in a bubble and learn nothing new. ''Children, by nature, start out very self-focused, so it can be hard for them to imagine lives and experiences outside of their own. (Simone Scully)''. If children are learning and growing from books, why take that away from