ipl-logo

Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay

910 Words4 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombs. Not the ones you see in Mario with the wind-up winch in the back. Big ones. Atomic. That wipe out cities so as to save lives. American lives. And that is why the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary, because it saved the lives of American soldiers who could have died in order to end the war. Justified or not Most people wonder if the bombing was necessary or if it could have been avoided altogether. Some would argue that America only dropped the bomb to make an example out of Japan. To show our powers to the Soviets and other countries and what will happen if they try and fight us. Others would argue that it was needed, that it saved countless innocent lives that would have been lost in an invasion. Then the subject of the supposed “negotiations” would always appear. And people would argue that Japan was about to surrender and they were at the end of their rope and everyone knew it. Yet they dropped the bomb anyways. And then someone would say that we gave the Japanese countless chances and even a few warnings before we took extreme measures to ensure our victory. Either way it save over three million Japanese lives and over a million American soldiers lives also. In this way it was justified in the eyes of our leader, the honorable President Harry Truman. Another example …show more content…

had in their arsenal. But when the second one dropped, many got scared and surrendered yet a few of the Japanese military wanted to keep fighting. But in fear of more of these bombs and loosing even more of his precious country, the Japanese head, Hirohito-sama called off his men and decided to surrender. What many don’t know is that rather than surrender many Japanese civilians killed themselves. And that if Japan hadn’t surrendered and there had been an invasion and women and children would have been used in order to keep their defense

Show More
Related
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

With more and more US lives being lost or will be lost when invading Japan more and more, the US made the reasonable decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan because like what Chamber said to win the war you have to end the other side and, “make it terrible, and the war will

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

President Harry Truman was justified in dropping the atomic bomb since it saved millions of American lives by ending the war as soon as possible, and established the United States as the greatest country in the world. With the bomb, America could “attack those that have hurt [America]” and save many American lives (Truman, Doc A). As part as revenge for Pearl Harbor, America was able to redeem itself against Japan with this bomb. It would make a statement to the world and force an unconditional surrender from Japan, as fast as possible. That would end the war and potentially save millions of young American soldiers.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

In the year of 1945, the U.S. had dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, causing a lot of damage. The U.S. was justified when dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because the Japanese was already ready to surrender and the japanese was already defeated, so there was no point. The bomb killed so many lives that shouldn't have been taken. Thousands of innocent people died or got wounded very badly, which was very unnecessary. Some people even became really sick as well, which was completely unnecessary.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

In Document 2, Admiral Leahy says, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.” Some Americans felt as though the weapon should not have been used because the Japanese were ready to give in. COME BACK Not only were the Japanese ready to surrender but it was morally wrong to bomb multiple cities without realizing what the outcomes may be.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

The deployment of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by President Truman during WWII is a contentious issue still debated today. With an aim to achieve victory over Japan without any further loss of life or military resources, some say that his decision was logical and ultimately successful in accomplishing national goals. However, others regard this act as immoral claiming that such violence could never be justifiable under any circumstance. In support of dropping the atomic bomb, proponents asserted that it was crucial to quickly end the war and avoid further loss of American lives. According to Document 3, Secretary Stimson believed that deploying the bomb was crucial to quickly end the conflict and avoid a land invasion of Japan, which would have caused more American lives to be lost.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Luke Weiner The bombing of Japan is a day that we shall never forget. Some people believe that it was necessary to drop the bomb in order to end the war as quickly as possible while others believe that it was unneeded and completely immoral. The question will always be asked, does the pros of the bombing outweigh the cons? Would it have been morally responsible to invade Japan instead? The morals of the bombing are in the eye of the beholder.

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified because, in war, death will happen no matter what, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with Pearl Harbor, they had it

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an Atomic bomb called the Little Boy on Hiroshima in Japan. A few days later the united states dropped another atomic bomb called the Fat man on the city of Nagasaki. The dropping of an atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the wars quickly, as Japan saw the devastating effects it had on their people and country. The decision to drop the bomb was a very hard one to agree on but changed lives for others. There are many pros and cons of the atomic bombs.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Instead, the atomic bombs were a tragic unnecessary act causing a large amount of death and suffering to civilians in Japan. The bombings on Nagasaki and Hiroshima created a pattern for the use of nuclear weapons in many ways, including the lack of boundaries. The use of these weapons during WWII masked the original use of them. These atomic bombings triggered an arms race between the Soviet Union and the United States, preparing them for a buildup on the use of these weapons. The atomic bombings inspired other countries to create and use nuclear weapons[3], increasing the risk of conflict.

Read More
965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the Japanese were willing to inflict the most harm possible, the war may have lasted several more years. By 1945, those involved in the war were shattered. Therefore, the use of the atomic bombs was justified because it put an end to an already horrific

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Thousands of Japanese military personal and civilians were killed the dropping of the atomic bomb. This was a very important turn the war because the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki forced the Japanese to surrender rand withdraws from the war. The American government did the right thing when they bombed Japan. America wanted to end the war with Japan and they believed that an economic blockade and conventional bombing would force the Japanese to surrender and pull out of World War II .President stated that the bomb was a military weapon and that he never had any doubts that it should be used as such.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Essay

Related Topics

Open Document