Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control debate with solutions
Gun control debate with solutions
Gun control debate with solutions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun control debate with solutions
Gun control debate with solutions
Gun control debate with solutions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On April 20, 1999, the unimaginable occurred at Columbine High School in the small town of Littleton, Colorado. A school shooting, carried out by, then senior students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold took the entire community by storm. With 15 deaths, including the perpetrators, and 24 non-fatal injuries, the memories of this horrific massacre will forever resonate in the minds of all. With a meticulously thought out plan, the two shooters prepared guns and bombs in order to perform the sickening act. Families, the FBI, local officials, psychologists, and more spent a multitude of time trying to figure out the reasoning as to what motivated the two boys to kill and cause so much pain to others.
Columbine, by Dave Cullen is a non-fiction book documenting the horrific massacre which took place in Littleton, Colorado on April 20, 1999. Not only does the writer give great detail about the shooting itself, he also gives and in depth look into the lives of the killers, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, and their victims. The focus of this book is for the author to attempt to bring to light what really happened and hopefully gain better understanding as to why it all took place. Cullen, a journalist, begins an extensive nine year research in order to achieve awareness of the happenings before, during and after this tragic event. Entries from the perpetrators personal journals, stories from the ones who witnessed the shootings first hand, countless interviews from the victim’s families, as well as multiple other pieces of information give the reader an extremely up close and personal surrounding Columbine.
Written by Kate Mater’s, the article “Why did the CDC Stop Researching Gun Violence” was published on April 5, 2016 in The Atlantic. The article investigates how the Dickey amendment may have led to the CDC from further conducting research on gun violence, an issue that has escalated more in recent years. The article also states that fatal shootings claim more than 30,000 lives a year, and with such a significant impact on public health, the CDC should claim responsibility to inquire why and how this issue can be resolved. It is through the investigation of how the CDC suddenly stopped researching gun violence that the author concludes the problem is complex than initially thought. Written using several testimonies and different perspectives,
After 10 years of research and writing David Cullen finally published Columbine based on one of the deadliest school shootings ever. There were many signs that were missed when it came to the Columbine shooting from their parents, friends, the school, and the police. Throughout the book we see many times in which people continued to miss the warning signs and drop the ball. Parents love and care about their children a lot, but sometimes even parents can miss major warning signs. In David Cullen's Columbine we see many times throughout the book where Eric and Dylans parents missed a lot of the signs.
Following, at the New York premiere of the Spike Lee’s satire about gun violence, director foretold that Chicago police superintendent was not going to be the only punished for how the city of Chicago handled the case of young McDonald. In addition, Chicago born actor John Cusack who plays priest in the film added his opinion on the situation that surrounded the death of Laquan McDonald. Cusack said that public saw the footage for the first time only last week, which they hid from public due to political reasons. “It’s very tragic that information was suppressed for an election cycle” However, the mayor is no under examination for what role he may have played in delaying the video’s release.
In the documentary “Bowling for Columbine”, which is directed by Michael Moore, there is an abundance of fallacious arguments. From the most obvious Post Hoc fallacies demonstrated to strengthen the director’s argument, to the numerous fallacies committed by Moore himself, there is no shortage from which to choose. The fallacies that I have chosen to focus on are the Post Hoc used by Moore’s “opponents” and his own hasty generalizations and composition fallacies. The title of the film “Bowling for Columbine” is and ode to the fallacious reasoning of the gun proponents that Moore encounters throughout the film. Many of these figures cite the music of alternative rock singer Marilyn Manson as a driving force behind the Columbine school shooting,
School Shootings: How We All Miss the Point... The aftermath of a school shooting is tragic, depressing, and causes hatred for the lives lost and the person who took them. Everyone, especially the media, tries to interpret why the shooter killed their victims, or why they felt the need to end others’ lives and their own. How We All Miss the Point on School Shootings, by Mark Manson, explains what and why these mass shootings happen. He starts by using examples of shootings and the murderer’s past.
Throughout history literary texts have been a vehicle for social commentary and political ideas. Both Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” and Michael Moore’s political documentary “Bowling for Columbine” exemplify this notion, utilising their own political perspectives to create unique and evocative interpretations of their time’s political situation. Miller presents “The Crucible” as an allegorical piece that is a commentary of the mass hysteria and paranoia that engulfed American society surrounding the McCarthy era. In “Bowling for Columbine” Moore creates a comedic, yet chilling documentary attempting to unveil the causes for the Columbine High School massacre and violence more generally in America. Both composers cleverly criticique the political circumstances of their time through a range of literary techniques and themes.
The documentary ‘Bowling for Columbine’ was put into production shortly after the shooting at Columbine High school and in it Michael Moore explores the reasoning behind America’s violent nature. Moore’s belief as too why there are more shootings in America is due to the relaxed gun laws in place in America. To show his point of view he uses a variety of persuasive techniques such as: visuals, audio/music, use of archival footage, political agenda/bias and scenes from various other documentaries. All of which he expertly strings together to influence the facts and opinions of other people.
Moore was able to use all three proofs throughout his documentary, through his appeal to ethos by sharing his own personal background and through interviews of other gun owners he was able to establish the audiences trust and gain himself credibility, and he used the appeal to logos when he showed us how easy it was to obtain a gun from the bank and by dropping the number of gun deaths with statistical numbers. With the appeal of pathos being Moore’s most effective, he was able to get his message across to an audience of various viewers. Bowling for Columbine sends a very powerful and meaningful message that opens the audiences’ eyes up to the rising gun violence that has been taking place and the lack of gun control that America
Even though guns are to be for protection and are to be used in case something horrible is about to happen to you, you can use the weapon to defend yourself. Michael Moore does a great job proving his point about how it has not done much protecting and has instead done quite actually the opposite. In the USA right now, gun violence is worse than anywhere else. The credibility Michael Moore has and proves throughout the documentary helps the audience understand where he's coming from with these questions and the exposure he wants to do on some of
He feels as if this is something that’ll never go away, as when these events happen, the media can get coverage and learn every single gruesome detail, thus netting them millions upon millions of viewers. Our generation is the one most adapted to technology. If information like this is going to be covered, what’s stopping people from watching it? People wanted to find the reason as to why the killers did what they did, and this was left very unclear, as it their actions didn’t have any clear justification. Answers were still craved, so naturally, people started making assumptions as to why the shooters did what they did.
I believe survivors of the Columbine shooting are not able to to truly move past the tragedy because the community will forever be known as “Columbine the tragedy” rather than Columbine the High School. A traumatic experience in which the individuals faced will stick with them for the rest of their lives. Individuals such as Patrick Ireland is able to create a new life, but is not truly able to move past the tragedy because physical injuries like his pinky or toes will constantly remind him of what occurred on April 20, 1999. Moreover, individuals such as Linda Mauser is unable to move past the shooting even after ten years because she remains angry. Cullen states, “Linda is angry at the cops, the school, the church she finally abandoned” (360).
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.