Pertinent Laws
There are many laws that are regulated by the Department of Labor (DOL), many of which protect certain actions and behaviors in the workplace. The transcript brushed upon some of the laws and showed where both the employer and employee violated some of them. Many labor laws are defined on a state level, as well as a federal level. The laws that are pertinent to the issue in the transcript are outlined below.
One law that could be applied to the issue presented in the case study is Employment at Will. Employment at Will, also known as at-will employment, is a labor law in which “an employer has the right to terminate an employee at any time and for any (or no) reason. It also means that the employee has the right to terminate his or her own employment at any time and for any (or no) reason” (Miller, 2014).. However, the company is still prohibited to terminate an employee based on discriminations such as religion and any other personal biases. This means an employer can choose to terminate an employee over minute behaviors, such as low productivity (though productivity may be high on most days). If ABC Corporation is protected by this law, then the case that Kareem is trying to build
…show more content…
These discriminations include “sex, race, color, national origin, and religion” (AAUW, 2016). Within the transcript, Kareem is more so protected by this law. If him and his lawyer were to build enough evidence that he was discriminated against due to his religion, then legal action will take place against the company, such as fines and a lower reputation. The law also protects employees from being retaliated against in the event they file a discrimination charge/report against the company. However, this law applies to businesses with more than 14 employees. ABC Corporation has many employees, in which all employees are protected by this federal