ipl-logo

Canada Responsible Government Essay

2374 Words10 Pages

Responsible Government in Canada
Politics is a part of everyday life. While this may seem like a mundane and obvious statement, the implications of it are much greater than one may think, especially in a country like Canada. Canada is a democratic nation state, run by a federal government. This government, which between it’s branches and divisional levels, is responsible for and, most importantly, to its citizens. The term for this type of responsibility is responsible government. However, it is poorly practiced, increasingly so as the years go on, and has not been adequately addressed since the Upper and Lower Canadian Rebellions of 1837-1838. This is why the statement ‘Politics is a part of everyday life’ is so important but seldom recognized; …show more content…

Moreover, this ignorance makes it harder for Canadians to hold their politicians accountable in their duties and role. Keeping Canadian citizens ignorant of their crucial role in our government through a lack of education makes it easier for politians to act in their own self-interest without consequence. Political and civic education needs to not only be designated more compulsory instructional time in schools but also needs to be more thorough and intensive. Students need to learn about more than just their basic rights and the bare minimum of how our government is structured; they need to explicitly learn about responsible government and how citizens are the foundation upon which the state is built and they need to be given Canadian examples of when and how the government has or can breach their role as a responsible …show more content…

This divide of constitutional powers was decided upon, in part, to maintain autonomy between the already divided regions of Canada and in turn to attempt to reinforce responsible government (H. Teixeira, personal communication, March 7, 2023). This division of power did not only occur between the central (federal) and regional (provincial) governments but within the central government as well. The federal government is divided into 3 branches of power each governed by different parties: the juridical by the Supreme Court of Canada, the legislative by the Senate and House of Commons, and the executive by the Governor General, Prime Minister, and the Cabinet (Parliament of Canada, n.d.c). Voting is determined by the single-member plurality, or less formally the first-past-the-post, system at both the federal and provincial level. In this system, each district or riding will vote for an individual to represent them as their MP in the House of Commons, then the leader of the political party that holds the most seats typically becomes the PM. However, the party does not need to hold the most seats overall, known as a majority government, they can also win by holding more seats than any of the other parties, even if they are outnumbered overall, known as a minority government (Elections Canada,

Show More
Related
1276 Words | 6 Pages

This method of legal governance was created based upon the common law system that is used in England and in some areas of Scotland. This organizational hierarchy is considered bi-jurisdictional, which is a result of the public and private laws being separated into the jurisdictions of the Parliament and the individual Provinces. Regardless of which unit is governing, each legal system is responsible for upholding the laws written in the Canadian Constitution. The Canadian Parliament has sole control over the transportation and energy infrastructures of the country, no matter which Province they reside

Read More
3068 Words | 13 Pages

Furthermore, Docherty (2002) suggests that the only province that appears to be fully committed to Senate reform is Alberta (the case 15 years ago anyway) while Most other provinces are quite happy to complain about the Senate but care little for reform [because] executive federalism has provided provincial premiers with a national stage that would be compromised with a powerful Senate. Inter-state federalism gives the Premier of Prince Edward Island, a province with fewer people than many Ontario cities, as much national authority as the Premier of Ontario. (Docherty 2002,

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The founding fathers of Canada when they put down the agreement of the Confederation did not envisage many cases such as the power of controlling the water sources. There are many differences over the ruling power between the federal government and the provinces, which makes the role of the queen critical in ruling between them (Salter & Hebert, 2014). The second role of the Queen in Canada is leading the crown institutions whose job does not depend on the parties at power, the RCMP, and the Central Bank of Canada are examples of these institutions that are supervised by the Queen and their leaders are nominated by

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The only elected position in the government was the Legislative Assembly. The other government positions were appointed by the governor. The Governor appointed the Lieutenant Governor's, one was in charge of Upper Canada, One was in charge of Lower Canada. They appointed the Legislative Council and the Executive Council. Eventually, responsible government was granted to Canada, first in Nova Scotia in January 1838, then, later in all of

Read More
1888 Words | 8 Pages

Canada’s constitution was created on, July 1, 1867, which established Canada’s bicameral parliamentary system consisting of the House of Commons and the Senate. The Founding Fathers of Confederation created the Senate as a complimentary chamber to the House of Commons, where its most important functions are to review legislation and act as a forum where the voices of the province’s regional interests can be heard. Sir John A. Macdonald made an interesting point that the Senate must never set itself in opposition against the understood wishes of the people (Forsey 2015). This statement by Sir John A. Macdonald is thought provoking because the Senate has faced controversy over whether its appointment process is affecting the Senate’s function

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, the monarchy is part of many Canadians’ lives as

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

In the government, depending on the president’s beliefs or the majority of the houses, one political party

Read More
400 Words | 2 Pages

The concept of divided government means that one political party can control the executive branch, the presidency, while another controls the legislative branch, congress. Divided government is primarily caused by voter turnout in presidential elections versus voter turnout in non-presidential elections. Presidential elections have a higher turnout of voters who vote for a single party while non-presidential elections have a significantly low voter turnout. “The majority of voters who turn out to the polls tend to be those who dislike the president 's new policies or are extremely politically engaged. Those who feel just okay about the government aren 't likely to show up at polls” (Rainer Benz).

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The Australian Government divides their powers into different sectors between the legislative, executive and the judiciary to prevent misuse of powers. Each section plays an important role in keeping the entire system fair while running smoothly. Australia allows for more than one party to be in elections, with the second highest voted party stand as the opposition, to give input in the running of Australia instead of one party having absolute power. This allows more ideas to be heard and contribute positively to the decision making of

Read More
249 Words | 1 Pages

In the future, I would like to complete many individual goals. For instance, one personal goal I have that I would like to accomplish is making over 50% of my free throws during basketball games this season. Whenever I shoot free throws during games I usually miss. As a post player, I get fouled a often which gives me more opportunities to shoot. I would like to take my time and focus on the fundamentals of shooting when I am at the line.

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

The Westminster system of government comprises of a democratically elected lower house. After the executive members the head of government is the prime minister. The next system that falls in place is the opposition which is led by the leader of the party or the parties with the second largest number of seats in the lower house. It follows that in the British system the prime minister and the cabinets are fully in charge of Parliament.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

The United States’ political system is broken into to three different branches. The executive, legislative and judicial

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

"Candidate with the highest number of the vote wins the right to represent the particular seat in the House of Commons", according to CBC news. There are some limitations regarding this method. First of all, it could possibly happen that candidate with less than half vote wins, which means it only reaches minority people's desired outcome. In addition to the tactical voting, the two-party system could be a serious problem. Since only the first matters, candidates with the low possibility to win may exist the election.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Secondly, the parliamentary executives, the cabinet minister and the Prime Minister, share responsibilities. Therefore, the parliament is “jointly responsible for the actions of the government…primus inter pares (first among equals)”. (Haywood, 2007, p. 95) Lastly, a typical feature of the parliamentary system is that the offices of the Head of State and the Head of the Government remain separate from each other. Union is a key feature of the parliamentary governments worldwide.

Read More

More about Canada Responsible Government Essay

Related Topics

Open Document