ipl-logo

Cassius Use Of Persuasion In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

1062 Words5 Pages

More often than not, if a child wants something he will flatter his parents as a form of manipulation so he gets what he wants. In everyday life, people use various forms of persuasion to get what they want. Likewise, characters in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare use persuasion to get what they want. In the play, Mark Antony is indisputably the most compelling of the orators because of the various appeals he uses in order to enrage the plebeians into turning against the conspirators It it clear Antony is the most persuasive because his audience is already predispositioned against him when he begins to speak. During Cassius’s argument, he tries to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. Although Brutus is highly educated, he has poor judgement because honor is so important to him and he is therefore easily coerced. Therefore, Cassius simply had to appeal to his honor and logic in order to persuade Brutus. Similarly, Brutus tries to influence the conspirators to act honorably in their work by …show more content…

Towards the end of his speech, Antony mentions Caesar’s will and claims that “It will inflame” the plebeians (III.ii.156). Antony baits them with the idea of the will in order to galvanize the plebeians, attempting to persuade the mob of plebeians to turn against the conspirators and get revenge for the death of their king by enraging them. Unlike Antony, in Act I, Cassius tries to convince Brutus to join the conspiracy. Despite Brutus’s friendship with Caesar, Brutus is known for his poor judgement, and as a result, he is easily influenced, which demonstrates how weak of an orator Cassius is. Moreover, it is easier to convince someone to join a group, rather than to turn him against his own group. Antony is certainly the most persuasive of the men due to his ability to aggravate the plebeians despite their allegiance to Brutus and the

Show More
Related
809 Words | 4 Pages

Antony the Rhetorician In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there are a few rhetoricians who used their speaking skills to trick others into accomplishing their plan. First, Cassius used his speaking skills to convince Brutus to join the conspiracy. Then, Brutus used his abilities to convince the people of Rome that killing Caesar was the right and only thing to do for them. Finally, Antony used his rhetoric to convince the crowds, who just accepted what Brutus told them, to turn against the conspirators, now called traitors, and kill them. Out of these rhetoricians, Cassius, Brutus, and Antony, Antony was the best.

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

First, Cassius uses ethos, pathos and logos to manipulate Brutus into joining the conspirators. When Cassius first mentions joining the conspirators Brutus is sceptical and asks him “into what

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

Leaders derive their power from a range of sources – military force, wealth, rank. However, leaders that we most admire win followers through the skill of persuasion. The ability of a speaker to persuade his listeners to agree with him signals that he is a powerful and astute figure. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character of Cassius attempts to convince Brutus that Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus, however, cares deeply for Caesar and is hesitant to kill the beloved hero of Rome.

Read More
159 Words | 1 Pages

Antony is more persuasive than Brutus, because he is more personal to the people. Antony starts off his speech with being personal to the people with saying, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

The Persuasive Methods of Antony and Brutus In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Act III Scene ii, both Antony and Brutus appeal to ethos, pathos, and logos when they present their speeches at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos to convince the plebeians that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome and the people. Antony appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos to convince the plebeians that the conspirators were wrong in killing Caesar. Though they both use these persuasive methods; they appeal to them with a different purpose in mind.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

‘In the context of the period c1550 to c1650 to what extent were religious changes most responsible for the persecution of witches in Europe?’ The ‘European witch craze’ in which widespread moral panic suggested that wicked satanic witches were operating as an organised threat to Christianity; those accused were portrayed as being worshipers of the Devil, engaged in acts of malevolent sorcery at meetings known as Witches’ Sabbaths. Those arrested, convicted and executed were statistically old, poor women. Midelfort’s ‘domino theory’ explains the escalation of persecution as the consequence of attempts “to enforce social and moral discipline (…) one of the consequences of the general movement of reform and repression”.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

While Brutus maintains noble intentions, Cassius goes into this scheme with every intention of leaving everyone else behind to claim the power for himself, as he has been compelled by their society to do. Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar “doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus” while convincing him that Caesar is accumulating too much power for one man, despite harboring the belief that all of that power should be his (JC I.ii.142-143). To further prove his point to Brutus, Cassius gives Brutus fake letters telling him that the common people would rather have Brutus in charge than Caesar. While this is just Cassius himself manipulating Brutus, Cassius is motivated by the pressures of their society and Brutus, motivated by the belief that his society wants him to, joins the conspirators in their plot to kill Caesar and take power for themselves. Caught in a vicious cycle of societal pressure, these men continue to fight for power even after they achieve their original goal as evidenced by the civil war that breaks out following the assassination of Julius

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

After reviewing the speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony and their use of pathos, ethos, and logos, the actions and reactions of the crowd clearly show that Antony is the more persuasive speaker. Antony brings up topics but says he should not talk about it because it would hurt the honorable Brutus but the crowd’s curiosity allows him to talk about certain topics. Antony brings up the will but says he will not read it because it would hurt Brutus, the crowd demands that the will be read which is exactly what he wants. Brutus and the other conspirators knows that the crowd could easily turn against them because of how effective of a speaker Antony is, which is one reason why Brutus left when Antony's speech started.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

At the same time Antony noticed the Romans emotions and values. Brutus is seen as a leader to all the conspirators, and he is respected by all of them. He tried to keep it together but instead he explains his motivations on why Caesar was killed. Antony's speech persuades the Romans to rise against the conspirators by having the plebeians’ express feelings of

Read More
79 Words | 1 Pages

Persuasion can cause crowds to riot, it can change someone's mind about anything because persuasion could possibly be one of the most powerful things in the World. In Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare gives us examples of why persuasion could be one of the most powerful things in the World. In Julius Caesar, Antony gives this wonderful speech about why these Conspirators are bad guys. Antony and Brutus both give two great speeches but Antony's speech is way more

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Cassius wants Brutus to think that if Throughout the play Julius Caesar, written by William shakespeare, Cassius uses manipulation to form his group of conspirators and make them perform his biddings. Most importantly, Cassius turns Brutus, one of Caesar’s greatest friends, to his side through various creative tactics. Body 1: During the Feast of Lupercal, Cassius pulls Brutus aside to begin his manipulative plan. Cassius explains to Brutus that “Men are sometimes masters of their fates”. They have the potential to change their future.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Cassius influenced Brutus to conspire against Caesar by stating, Caesar “is now become a god… and his name has been sounded more than [Brutus’s]” (Act 1, Scene 2, Line 118-145-6). Cassius’s arguments convinced Brutus in proving Caesar's murder would be just, but Caesar’s death is unjust because he is being murdered out of Brutus and Cassius’s jealousy. Both of the individuals are envious of the power that Caesar is being given by the people of Rome and want to end his life before they will lose their own power in the senate after Caesar becomes king. Brutus’ naive mind was easily convinced by Cassius that Caesar was not the best choice to assume the Roman throne because he would not listen to their political thoughts.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

This rational method of comparing Brutus and Caesar serves to emphasize Cassius’s argument through a logical method of persuasion. As evidenced by the techniques of pathos, rhetorical questions, and compare and contrast, Cassius uses persuasion in a skillful way in order to convince Brutus to overthrow

Read More
1349 Words | 6 Pages

149-151). This indicates that being a true roman is their number one priority, and Brutus would not inform the others that breaking the promise of an oath would take that away from them without there being a purpose for it. Brutus is convincing Cassius and the others by making very agreeable statements to insure that they are on the same page as

Read More
1409 Words | 6 Pages

Unfortunately, Cassius uses Brutus’ altruistic characteristic and devout loyalty against him by sending fake letters with concerns regarding the crowning of Caesar for Brutus to read and be persuaded to join the conspirators. Cassius’ manipulation of Brutus serves as an example of how Shakespeare

Read More

More about Cassius Use Of Persuasion In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document