ipl-logo

Civil War Dbq

771 Words4 Pages

During the 1800’s, issues such as slavery became a huge topic in America. Today, most people believe the civil war was about slavery, but it was only part of it. The war was actually about preserving the Union. This makes me wonder, “What led to the secession of the South?” While it is hard to say abolitionists were directly responsible for the national discord in America, they were a key part in causing the increase of sectional divide. For example, Harriet Beecher Stowe was an abolitionist outraged by the Fugitive Slave Law. She wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin to show what slavery really was. It sold over 500,000 copies in the United States. They helped expand the support for abolishing slavery nationwide. President Lincoln even called Harriet …show more content…

While the issue of states were avoided then, the Compromise of 1850, definitely intensified sectional feelings. The Compromise of 1850 required that the Fugitive Slave Law be put into place. It required Northerner’s to return runaway slaves that were within their region, but if they refused, then the Northerner could be faced with severe punishments. This appalled the North, but the Southerners approved this act. This led to an increasing conflict between them. I felt the government should have made a different compromise, that could have unaffected the North yet satisfy the South. The government was afraid of disunion or secession, and instead wanted to preserve the union. As a result, John Calhoun argued for southern rights, return runaway slaves, and leave slavery alone. However, this was countered by Daniel Webster and Henry Clay. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was another issue that caused a division. It created two new territories that would allow the states to use popular sovereignty. While this was generally a good idea, a problem occurred in Kansas where “Border Ruffians” attempted to force Kansas towards slavery. Then later, there was a fight at Lawrence, Kansas whether or not the territory would be slave owned or free. The fight was even brought to the Senate where Charles Sumner was beaten by Senator Preston

Show More
Related
1506 Words | 7 Pages

Michael Jones R. Raby HIS 131 11/18/16 Compromise of 1850: Essay The meaning of the Compromise of 1850 was as a package of five separate bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850, which defused a four-year political confrontation between slave and Free states regarding the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–48). Also I am going to talk about how it was important to the slaves. One of the legislative bills that was passed as part of the Compromise of 1850 was a new version of the Fugitive Slave Act. At first, Henry Clay introduced an omnibus bill covering these measures.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

As the United States moved west during its Westward expansion, it prevented the south from making the states above that line to become a slave state. Because of this the Compromise of 1850 was made so that certain states would be determined to be a slave state or not. In addition to this conflict, problems in Kansas and Nebraska sparked an internal territorial problem in these states. For example in Kansas there were battles over territories which either allowed slavery or opposed it. This caused the Kansas-Nebraska act to be

Read More
1985 Words | 8 Pages

To please the South, slavery would be prohibited forever from Louisiana Purchase territories n orth of 36° 30'. Southern extremists opposed any limit on the extension of slavery, but settled for now. Missouri and Maine were to enter statehood simultaneously to preserve sectional equality in the Senate. For almost a generation this Compromise seemed to settle the conflict between the North and South. But in 1848 the Union acquired a huge piece of territory from Mexico.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The value of slaves skyrocketed due to the suitable conditions in the South; in fact, both the tropical climate and the invention of the cotton gin allowed the habitable environment of the South to Flourish. Also, Abraham Lincoln being elected encouraged the Southern States to secede. The South feared that he would end slavery, so there was no trust toward Lincoln. Keeping in mind that slavery was the heart of the Southern States, Southerners did not want to risk losing slaves, so they chose to leave the Union to preserve their most prized possession, slavery. As a result, the Southerners labeled themselves as the Confederacy while the northern States were the Union.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

American history noted that the secession of the southern states was a reason for the Civil War. The Civil War had many men to die during the cause, less men died in the world war comparing them to the Civil War. Slavery was a cause for the southern states to secede and it could be considered as one of the major factors. Along with state sovereignty, economic, and political difference are amongst the list that caused the south to secede. Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, and South Carolina were the southern states that seceded and form a southern Confederacy.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

Uncle Tom’s Cabin personalized political and economic arguments about slavery. Harriet Beecher Stowe’s writing style impacted people because she wrote in such a way that depicted slavery in such a true and emotional way, which only made some northerners want abolition even

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

The new territories would become new states on the United States and the issue of slavery was the controversial issue among the southern and northern states. The northern states wanted to expand to the western hemisphere due to the growth of population and limited acres of land for expansion for industrial production. The south was also seeking land expansion for plantation especially since their economy was dropping, and this is why they wanted to bring slavery in these new territories. Both regions sought a feature but feared one another because of the different view on slavery; and neither one wanted their opponent or region to dominant these

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the mid-19th century,slavery catalyzed the reaction which left America broken as separatism divided her people in to the Northern free states and the Southern slave states. Which in turn, opened up problems in the election, secession and constitution disputes, thus amplifying the threat of potential secession and tensions which would eventually lead to the Civil War. Thus, the divide between Northerners and Southerners was evident as their views on slavery dissented each other as well as shaped their judgement. As a consequence to the internally generated political conflicts within America acquired from the implementation of slavery, the Civil War was an accumulation of problems that furthered the divide within America.

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Secession was not the primary cause of the Civil War because Southern states felt that their state rights protected them and their rights to own slaves. Although Historians would argue secession was the primary cause of the Civil War because the war started after the South seceded.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Southern states even threatened to secede because of the differences in opinion on slavery. To prevent this, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state, but in exchange, Maine was admitted as a free state. In addition, all states and lands north of the 36°30’ parallel would be free (except for Missouri). This ‘compromise’ somehow managed to hold America together, but no one was really satisfied.

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

This irritated pro-slave Southerners and caused them to resent the antislavery Northerners more. This dissolved more of what little trust each side still had in the other. Due to sectionalism, neither side would let go of their initial views and were very committed to getting their preferred solution. This resulted in recurring dissent and disagreement, but even after the fighting settled a little, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed and fueled another large-scale

Read More
1081 Words | 5 Pages

In 1860, the Southern slave states elected to secede from the United States of America and form the Confederate States of America. The issues that resulted in the secession of the south included disagreements over tariffs and state rights, but the greatest issue was over slavery, which was legal and a large part of culture and economy in the South but had been slowly prohibited by states in the North. As the United States expanded into the West with new territories, fierce debates started over whether or not slavery would be legal in those expanded territories. People in the South feared that not allowing slavery in these new states would eventually cause slavery to be outlawed in all of America. Southerners were also bitter about how Southern

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

During the American Civil War, two distinct groups, North and South, differed in their economic strong suits because one depended on agriculture and the other on industrialization. Additionally, in the political aspect, one had the mentality of staying a union even if the cost was a complete transformation while the other argued secession. Lastly, in the social facet, one pleaded the profound immorality of slavery while the other the mistreatment of workers in the North. Tensions between both sides began as early as 1820 with the Missouri Compromise, when Missouri, a slave state, requested admission into the Union. Later, in 1850 after gaining a lot of territory from the Mexican-American War, the United States was facing a challenge.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

Although the issue of slavery in America would not be resolved until after the Civil War, the Mexican-American War marked a major turning point in the debate over slavery because it introduced the idea of popular sovereignty which resulted in Bleeding Kansas, and because the terms of the results of the war led to the Compromise of 1850, which was very controversial in the North. Prior to the Mexican-American War, slavery was an intensely debated subject in America. The Northern states were opposed to the practice of slavery, or at least the expansion of it, while the Southern states’ economy relied on slavery, and were supportive of it. The relationship between the North and the South was stable at the start of the 1800’s, but rapidly deteriorated over their conflicting views on slavery. In order to keep a balance of power, the Union consisted of an equal number of free and slave states.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

None of the major events or acts would've happened if the country did not disagree over slavery. Therefore, it is obvious that slavery was the main reason for the Civil War. Slavery led to The Missouri Compromise, which divided the country between slave states and free states. This was one of the reasons for why the country split later years. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act that was created to settle the country's disagreements about slavery.

Read More

More about Civil War Dbq

Open Document