ipl-logo

College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

550 Words3 Pages

Paying college athletes is a controversial topic. College athletes are normally towards getting paid. The rest of the collegiate body has split opinions. One opinion is that college athletes shouldn’t be paid. Some people believe this because college athletes aren’t employees, sports programs do not have the money to spare, and there are already scholarships given to athletes. Many people never want to be the person putting money into another person’s pocket; paying college athletes is no exception. College athletes are at a college to learn about a specific degree. They are not at college to play sports (Cooper 12). Many of the college athletes aren’t considering their education, they want to play their sports. Because of this, they are under …show more content…

One style of scholarship that colleges can give their athletes is a full-ride. Schools do not need to pay their athletes more than the cost of attendance, which is why some colleges give full-rides to some athletes (Roberts). There are also many other scholarships that colleges award their athletes. Among these other scholarships is the basic athletic scholarship, which many colleges are quite ‘open-handed’ with (Lewis 22). In case the above forms of payments aren’t enough for all college athletes, there are other options if athletes show the need for more money. The NCAA is willing to provide extra money to “Pell Grant recipients” for personal items and travel home in case of emergencies (Gerdy 8). The opinion that college athletes shouldn’t be paid exists all around the country. College athletes shouldn’t be paid because they aren’t employees, the sports programs don’t have extra money, and the athletes are already receiving compensation for their work on the team. Although there are split opinions among the college students who are not athletes, many high school students who don’t plan on being athletes in college are against paying college athletes. These high school students feel that paying college athletes is an absurd

Show More
Related
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

Many agreeing with researcher, college athletes should not be paid. College athletes are still considered ameature athletes. The college athletes are not worth a single penny until they hit the professional stage. To close, college sports are loved for the players heart and intensity they play with. If a salary is implemented, it may just affect the style of play the athletes play with.

Read More
2151 Words | 9 Pages

Since the beginning of NCAA athletes have poured their blood, sweat and tears into the sport they are passionate about. Its always about the love of the game, who out works the other and many of sacrifices to be a student athlete at the collegiate level. When athletes reach their goal to enter in the collegiate level it becomes more like a business, and their job is win games and championships which ultimately brings profits to these universities. Over the years people including the athletes have debated upon the issue on whether college athletes should be paid. Some people argue that athletes should get paid because they don’t have time to work or find a job.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

"Over the last decade, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid has intensified, and many athletes, as well as coaches, have begun to advocate for the cause." (TIMES) Tyler Harnett, a writer at the Huffington Post, took his standpoint on the topic in the article "Why College Athletes Should be Paid," which clearly states his claim, college athletes should be paid. Personally, I disagree with Harnett's viewpoint and I don't believe college athletes should be paid due to education, funding, and overall fairness. To summarize Harnett's article, he starts by talking about his opponents and their viewpoints on the situation, "They are already getting a scholarship, don't be greedy."

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

However, some people think college athletes should not be paid for many reasons such as, college athletes already receive numerous benefits. Many get scholarships, which help pay for their tuition, books ,dorms, and sporting equipment. According to the NCAA, college athletes often receive grants worth up to 100,000 dollars. They are the first choice for professional leagues, which draft college athletes at a higher rate than overseas or minor leagues. Also they might argue, college athletes should be considered students first, because by receiving direct payment, they would basically be employees or professionals rather than students.

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

Being a college athletes take full time dedication and participation in regular classes. When you have the privilege of attending such universities, and colleges you are only representing the bests. That means, when you graduate, you will have of the best support and scholarships that you can possibly achieve. This situation mostly only applies to the students who attend the fanciest universities, and colleges. Some scholarships may seem like a lot money, but cover only the mysterious, housing, tuition, fees, meal-plan, multiple hundred-dollars textbooks and unknown fees.

Read More
1609 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore many college athletes are forced to pay out of pocket for certain items not covered on scholarship such as clothes, food, and gas. This is hard for many college athletes since themselves or their parents do not have the money for the extra items. A selected few athletes will get a chance to bring their family out of poverty and make a great living in either the NBA or the NFL. But for the not so lucky ones that end their careers at the collegiate level they should receive some money in order to pay for the expenses that any college student would need to since they do not simply have the time to get a part time job while enrolled in college and participating in their specific sport. The benefits that the players can receive from receiving a salary are endless.

Read More
1220 Words | 5 Pages

Scholarships do not cover all the expenses and athletes do not have time to work to pay off debt. Since scholarships do not cover everything, athletes should get paid so they do not graduate largely in debt. The large debt would accumulate over the course of their four year stay at the college. The payment would be very similar to what they would get if they were working a job because they have spent a majority of their time with their sport. Furthermore most athletes do not receive full ride scholarships or student loans being schooled only have a limit number to offer.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Some athletes will get thousands of dollars worth of education paid for at their university, while others could end up on a full scholarship. Within the same Scholastic News article the author continues to write the pros and cons of paying athletes when they stated, “Others point out that getting a scholarship means getting a free college education and free housing. They say that is just as good as getting paid.” Scholarships are one big paycheck for college athletes. Why do they need to be paid more than they already are to just play their sport?

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Thousands of students walk out of the same college with the same degree as an athlete but are stuck with tens of thousands of dollars in debt they have to pay throughout the rest of their lives. In the article “Paying College Athletes: Overview” Tracy Dilacio wrote that “they are often compensated for their participation with full scholarships to competitive—and often very expensive—colleges and universities”. Student-Athletes, while not getting paid cash in a normal sense, are getting paid by their colleges as scholarships. Collegiate athletes do not need to be paid more than what they are, which is a free, high-level

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

“When you pay student-athletes, you give them the chance to earn money to buy necessities in their daily life” (College Raptor). How do college athletes survive if they can not make any extra money if they are so focused on the game? “Between their games and practices they do not have time to work” (College Raptor). Many college athletes deserve to be paid because of how much dedication and time they have given to their college and the sport they play. In conclusion, athletes could focus on their sport instead of paying for rent and food.

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

College athletes are responsible for their education. School should be the priority first and not the sport. According to Nocera, “Paying students to play would turn them into employees, shifting their focus away from academics” (9). The college athletes work more than 60 hours a week just on practicing. This makes them exceed way above an average employee.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

One very controversial topic in college sports over the past few years is whether or not college athletes should get paid (Link) College athletes should not get paid to play Not only are there strict rules and violations within the NCAA, but adding a salary would negatively alter the mindset of many student-athletes in college The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a non-profit association which regulates the majority of college athletes. If the NCAA decides to pay players then it will cause problems within the sporting industry. Including title IX violations, and difficulty with distribution of money among athletes.

Read More

More about College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Open Document