ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Articles Of Confederation And US Constitution

436 Words2 Pages

The article of confederation were laws that the 13 states in the United States accepted and signed; while the U.S constitution is a set of rules that govern the nation's citizens. The articles of confederation has a lot of flaws with weaknesses like no power to tax, no national executive, no judicial/national court, no checks and balances; which all resulted in no money, no enforcement of laws, unequal representation. In comparison, the U.S constitution creates equal representation, meaning that small states have an equal voice. The U.S constitution also keeps disagreements from happening, allowing a better transition of power. In the 5th and 14th amendments, the constitution says that "the government shall not deprive anybody of life, liberty, …show more content…

When the Articles of confederation was the law, federal courts were not in picture and all laws were controlled by state courts. The Constitution changed this by forming a federal court system, which had the responsibility of solving issues involving citizens and states. As a result, the Supreme Court handled conflicts between states instead of the Congress. The articles of confederation states that only 9 out of 13 states have to support the law for it to be enforced while the U.S constitution states that before a law is changed, it should have the support of both houses of the legislature. This truly shows how much the U.S constitution has improved upon the articles of confederation. In this article, it also shows that A bill of rights was not something that citizens could claim to be good. But the U.S constitution shows citizens can be assured that the bill of rights states that there is equality for all. The articles of confederation says that each state has only a single vote while the U.S constitution claims that in the legislature, every legislative representative has one

Show More
Related
167 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitution was far superior to the Articles of Confederation because, the Articles of Confederation had fewer powers than the Constitution. Also, the Constitution created a balance in the government that the Articles of Confederation did not. Lastly, the Constitution took everyones thoughts into consideration. The Articles of Confederation did not include as many powers as the Constitution did. In the political cartoon it showed all the powers that the Constitution included that the Articles of Confederation discluded.

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

he Articles Of Confederation and The United States Constitution are very different but also quite similar. They have two very different ways to govern the new world. But these ways are also very similar as well. Whether through ways of governing or individual rights. These documents have many similarities and differences.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

Due to the Constitution allowing the states to be governed as a whole, it caused national unity as it also allowed national debt to start being payed off from the Revolutionary war from the states as a whole as opposed to letting states tax each other. Another similarity between these two documents was that states could not go alone into a war and had to depend on themselves as well as other states to contribute forces. The Articles of Confederation didn’t allow congress to deal with troops but states had that power instead. However, in the Constitution, congress dealt with troops

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was one of the first forms of the Constitution established, but it was replaced with the current Constitution because it failed to establish unity. The Articles of Confederation was a more simple and weak version of the Constitution. In the Articles of Confederation, all power was given to the state such as collecting taxes while congress had close to no power. Each state had more power than congress and the people combined. The AOC failed to establish laws limiting citizens to their rights.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

There were no executive and non-judicial, two of the three branches of government we have today as a system of checks and balances. But, on the other hand, The Constitution is doing way better than the Article of confederation. The Constitution has a strong central government, States have delegated powers, and the Federal government has sovereignty. They also have 3 branches of government which are the legislative, executive, and judicial while the articles of confederation only have one branch which is the legislative branch.

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

The us constitution and the Articles of Confederation are similar but different in many ways. The articles of confederation line out the basic ideas of government and written in the US Constitution are the expanded ideas that make the United States Unique. The Articles of confederation #7 states that all of the United States of America have to vote for the ratification of one thing. This was established to keep silly laws/acts to the Articles of Confederation from being amended but as more important amendments had to ratified it became nearly impossible to have all of the state representatives vote together for the ratification of one thing.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

McKenzie Dalcour HIST 1301 Professor Gooding March 16, 2024 Midterm Essay: Differences between The Articles of Confederation and The U.S. Constitution The Articles of Confederation were adopted on November 15, 1777, and were to serve as the nation’s first “constitution”. The Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781 and forced into effect. It was essentially a guideline or code of laws and rules between the fourteen states.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

The key difference between the articles of confederation were the initial agreements made by the United States in the 18th century, while the constitution represents the set of guidelines that democratic nations and organizations develop over time to to maintain law and order within their jurisdiction. “These rules were proposed by the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 after considering an alternative, providing that when two-thirds of the states called for amendment, the national legislature would ‘call a convention for that purpose’.” (Kay 2018, 244) Article V states that “the very nature of an “entrenched” constitution requires that it be harder to change than ordinary law.” This is because the constitutional decision making which should require more than a mere majority vote in the legislature. The majority's preference, therefore, can be frustrated by some minority, and the harder it is to amend, the greater will be the abridgment of the democratic power to choose the rules governing collective life.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation gave the states much more power. The Articles of Confederation gave states the power to determine how delegates were to be elected, levy and collect taxes, as well as control their individual commerce. Under the Constitution the state governments were striped of these powers. The federal government decides delegates, taxes, and commerce. The Constitution expanded the powers of the federal government.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

In one hand, the Articles of Confederation had a weak central government, differing form the strong central government in the Constitution. The Constitution’s government had a structure of three different branches; the legislative, executive, and judicial branch; unlike the Articles of Confederation that had no structure whatsoever. The Articles of Confederation had many problems like, the poor international trade, poor foreign relations and a weak economy in contrast to the Constitution that only had one problem, the struggle over the ratification. the Articles of Confederation achieved the Northwest Ordinance and the Northwest Territory and according to a history website, the Constitution achieved that we had a system of checks and balances, that we had a bill of rights, and, eventually, the survival of a bloody civil war intact. Lastly, the Constitution had three compromises: the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise and the Slave Trade compromise.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The most important difference between these documents was that the Articles of Confederation gave very little power to a central government and the Constitution created a strong central government. The Article of Confederation was written to unite states after the American Revolution. People had the fear of the government having too much power. This document established

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Articles Of Confederation And US Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document