ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

957 Words4 Pages

Both federalists presidents, George Washington and John Adams demonstrated a great extent of promoting Unity of the Nation and the authority of the federal government throughout the time period of 1789-1798 by enforcing new laws, having control of the miltras. After the American Revolution in 1783, although the United States of America was formed, many states remained divided and believing they are better than one another. Thus lead to the form of the Constitution and the formation of the Federal government. This frighten many citizens like Thomas Jefferson, an Anti Federalists, because the idea of central government might turn their way of government back to a monarchy. When Washington gave his first Inaugural address in 1790, his purpose …show more content…

As government began to gain more power and authority they began to start violating the citizens very own rights in order to gain more power. The Alien and Sedition act explained that no one can criticize the government which completely go against the 1st amendment of the bill of rights of free speech and press. This violation goes back to the John Peter Zenger’s trial during the colonial period, where the British violated the colonists rights. The citizens,intended audiences, is shocked by this because, after they have separated from the oppressing British, they are once again having their rights being violated. This led the citizens to believe that the federal government have too much power. ( document G) This led to many debates and cause hatred to the federal government. This led to the state of Kentucky to draft the Kentucky resolutions to say that the Alien and Sedition act to be unconstitutional. The purpose of the Kentucky resolution was basically to express the hatred towards the federalists and also to protest against the Sedition act. They believe it go against the 1st amendment, thus citizens do not have to follow because it goes against our rights. From the Kentucky resolutions, it allows one to tell that the Federal government is starting to obtain too much power and they will have to start to contain it. (document H) A great source that would be able to support this statement would be the XYZ affair because it will show how much power Adams have and how he was unwilling to compromise with the French without even informing Congress or the house of representatives or the Senate

Show More
Related
784 Words | 4 Pages

These resolutions were issued in 1978 in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts. They asserted the right to overrule the federal government. These resolutions give states more power than the federal government. 55. Election of 1800 Jefferson and Burr tied in the number of electoral votes and then Hamilton supported Jefferson, which eventually won him the election.

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

The view here is that the states would have the final say in anything the federal government says or does. In Document H, the Kentucky Resolutions, secretly written by Jefferson and Madison, articulate this in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions condemned the acts as unconstitutional and thought that the states should have the right to declare them as such and ignore them. Document I, the Rhode Island Responses to the Kentucky and Virginia Resolution, a Federalist approach is taken. This resolution, surprisingly, used a very literal interpretation of the Constitution to argue the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

The Sedition Act had gotten Democratic-Republicans angered, they saw this law as a threat towards the citizens. The act violated Democratic-Republicans of the Federalists policies and they believed that the guarantee of freedom of speech had been taken away from them. Democratic-Republicans passed the Virginia and Kentucky Resolution, this policy declared that the Alien and Sedition Act not valid. “They protested against the “alarming infractions of the Constitution,” particularly the freedom of speech that “has been justly deemed, the only effectual guardian of every other right.” Virginia even claimed that states had a right to nullify any powers exercised by the federal government that were not explicitly granted to it” (Lewis and Hewitt 230).

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

Anti-Federalists in the late 1780s strongly objected to the amount of authority given to the government by the constitution, and had an unorganized but large effort to prevent its ratification. The Anti-Federalists believed that liberty could only be upheld if the federal government remained small and uninvolved with local matters in the states. Congress, with the power to make laws deemed necessary and proper, has no firm limitations under the constitution. Anti-Federalists thought that each state should control itself, with minimal interference by Congress or the national government. The purpose of becoming independent of England was because the King was not sympathetic to struggles in the Americas, and under this new constitution, the executive

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

It involved "nothing less than the existence of the UNION . . . the fate of an empire, in many respects, the most interesting in the world. "(Hamilton, Federalist papers #1) A wrong decision in this matter would "deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind. "(Hamilton, Federalist paper #1) Expecting criticism

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

The document consisted of acts/ laws that if violated citizens would have suffered consequences. For example, the document proclaimed that if, “any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States” (Sedition Act), would have been convicted, punished, and imprisoned. Our fellow opponents, the Republicans, stated that with this law, we are eliminating freedom of speech and press from the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. That was quite incorrect. This was a necessary precaution of the prosperity and stability of the nation.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

causes could not be removed7. Alexander Hamilton advocated in Federalist Paper No. 51 for a strong central government with a system of checks and balances; “several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places”8. Hamilton and Madison specifically tried to prevent a revolution, like theirs toward Britain, from happening in America by proposing a strong democratic republic that could operate in concert with state governments and maintain a certain level of autonomy over the states and the nation as a whole. Federalist Papers No. 6-9 spoke to the importance of a strong union, as well as the discord a separation of states might have caused9.

Read More
1808 Words | 8 Pages

Next, the checks and balances system are discussed and how it suggests regulations for the government. Jefferson makes a note towards the significance of independence and how it is ideal to allow the people handle it. Later, he states the release of the imprisoned or fined with the power of pardon. The case of Marbury and Madison is discussed and he states his ability to retain the commissions being transported. His final point is that the branches of government should be able to determine their obligation under the Constitution and not be concerned of the other

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

Like any political thought sometimes it will agree with other and by other times disagreed just how the Federalist and Anti-Federalist happen to proceeded . However we can say that from both ways on the balance they would both provide compromise and at the end come together . To start with the Federalist Party that was lead by James Madison and happen to be in favor of the formed Constitution, which ideal point was to provide security to the union along with a variety of states that could encourage arise as a piece to the union. Madison would see the new republican form of government more enriched in Constitution due to all the overcome it could provide to the unions . Improvements such as in the infrastructure side of union taking all the

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

Another reason for this belief was people didn't have guaranteed rights. In conclusion this belief among others led to the Anti Federalists fighting against the constitution. The Federalists and Anti Federalists thoughts on the bill of rights like everything else was different. The Federalists believed that the bill of rights was useless. Anti-Federalists thought it was essential to making sure that peoples rights were kept safe.

Read More
247 Words | 1 Pages

We gained two important pieces of American history from the discourse between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalists. First we gained a more balanced Constitution with the addition of the Bill of Rights. Second being the Federalist Papers. The federalist papers are a collection of 85 articles and essays written. These papers explained the Constitution and its meaning to many who were not informed.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

In, 1798, the Alien and Sedition Act went into place. The Alien part of the Act is for non-citizens, America has the right to export them if they slander the government while the Sedition Act is for current citizens, citizens could be punished by fine or imprisonment for criticism of America. I think this Act is a smart idea because no one should know all the information about the government, word spreads like wild fire and could end up in the wrong ears. If we allowed citizens to criticize the government how they please, other countries could get a hold of that information, use it to their advantage and harm the United States. I am going to have to be a Federalist on this issue.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists The Federalists were the people who supported and proposed the U.S. Constitution. They had a wish of a stronger national government and were in favor to ratify the U.S. Constitution to manage debt and pressure following the American Revolution. Most of the Federalists lived in the metropolitan areas. The Federalists wanted the government to help regulate the economy because the majority of them dominate big business and arts. They supported the central banking and central financial policies.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

The opposing viewpoints of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created lengthy debates on how the newly found country would run the government and what rules would be considered the supreme law of the land. The anti-federalists thought the government held too much power and wanted the inclusion of the Bill of Rights (Young, slide 30). Patrick Henry, one of the most ardent anti-federalist, advocated extensively for the inclusion of the bill of rights (Young, “Found Fathers…”). Henry constantly voiced his discontent with the constitution and questioned aloud why the inclusion of the Bill of Rights were not added. As the delegate of Virginia, he led the people of Virginia to reject the ratification of the constitution and promised them that by his efforts and their rejection that the Bill of Rights would be included (Young, “Found Fathers…”).

Read More
1696 Words | 7 Pages

Lastly the Sedition Act restricted free speech among the people which violated people’s protection granted under the first amendment of the constitution. However during this time the practice of the Judicial Review was still in its early stages and therefore not always effective. These acts were ultimately what helped the democrats defeat the Federalists during the election of 1800. The Sedition Act was allowed to expire in 1800 and the Alien Friends Act in 1801. Thomas Jefferson ended up

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

Open Document