Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
A comparison of Lee and Grant
Examples of comparisons between grant and lee
The start of nationalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A comparison of Lee and Grant
Examples of comparisons between grant and lee
The start of nationalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Grant on the other hand was not raised wealthy at all he knew the struggle, he had a vision for where he thought the future was going. Completely different, but exactly the same when it came to their personality. Almost the same even when they were fighting, Grant fought with tenacity, Lee fought knowing he would give his life at any second if he had too. This is why people looked up
Sherman and George Thomas were promoted to Brigadier General in August, 1861, and assigned to the Department of the Cumberland. He told Andrew Johnson, in which he was under the command of, that with 60,000 men Sherman could drive the enemy out of Kentucky. The newspapers claimed that Sherman must be “crazy” to demand such a force and the public accepted the insult because the writers have. always declared that he was crazy
Well he had much better knowledge with tactics and strategys. Grant beat Lee only because of more men and supplies and also, he truly was a fighter, a tough battle, bad losses, a bad outcome didn't shake him. In that regard, I'd place only Meade and maybe Hooker as "fighters" besides Grant. Third, he did a great job using his subordinates. Under Grant, officers like Sheridan and Sherman saw their potential and flourished as commanders.
Challenges of the late 19th century between Ulysses S. Grant and Frederick Jackson Turner. Grant was known for his Inaugural Address he wrote on March 4th, 1869 he talked about rights for every man no matter what race to have equal rights and be able to vote anywhere in the United States. Grant also hated politics; he thought he didn’t owe Politian’s anything. Grant was also a popular person, being that he was a popular person people told him to run for president and so he did. He didn’t have to campaign himself because everyone just voted for him.
In Bruce Catton’s article, “Grant and Lee: A study in Contrasts” he contrasts the differences in the ideologies of the north and the south, while comparing the similarities between the generals themselves. To develop the thesis Catton begins by providing historical context on the two generals working out the terms for surrender of the south, this sets the stage for the next few paragraphs contrasting them. When he contrasts the generals he describes their childhoods and then goes on to describe the ideologies they supported. After this, the author compares the similarities between the generals, which tells the reader that despite the fact they lead two opposing factions in the civil war they weren’t so different as people.
Ulysses S. Grant made many major contributions to the nation as a military strategist, a Civil War hero, supporting the rights of African Americans and serving as the 18th President. Grant attended military school and used his military strategies to help win the Civil War and contribute to ending slavery in the United States. As president, he supported the rights of African Americans, he passed acts to protect the freed slaves from being enslaved again, he allowed all citizens to vote in the 15th Amendment, and he guaranteed equal treatment of African Americans in public places. As the 18th president of the United States, he worked to increase trade between the United States and other countries and improve the nation’s relationships with countries
Burnson President Truman v. General MacArthur Brandon Rubsamen History 8-A October 1, 2014 This essay contains only my own words and ideas. When I have paraphrased someone else’s words or ideas, I have used completely original wording and correctly cited my source. When I have used someone else’s exact words, I have used quotation marks properly and have correctly cited my source. I understand that any evidence of plagiarism will result in a “0.”
Lee was against succession and was a proud U.S. Army Commander. He had been the Superintendent of the U.S. Military Academy and was a very successful Army Officer. He loved the U.S. and the Army. “The South, in my opinion, has been aggrieved by the acts of the North, as you say. I feel the aggression, and am willing to take every proper step for redress.
IV Both Lee and Custer were defeated. Why were the consequences of defeat so different? Both General Lee and Custer had been defeated. Therefore, it could be argued that both men could be considered as failures.
Lee brought something new into the military world. He had very differnt and unique views on his military and tactics as opposed to other generals of his time and/pervios american
Comparison and Contrast Analysis “A Study in Contrasts” In his essay “A Study in Contrasts,” Bruce Catton effectively delineates the extreme contrasts between Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grand and Robert E. Lee, but also describes their surprising similarities. Cattons’s purpose in employing comparison and contrast in his essay is to describe the differences in the two Civil War generals from the North and the South and how their colossal differences reflect the sectional tensions that lead to the war, but also how they have remarkably similar fighting qualities that help pave to road to peace after war. For instance, he corroborates that Lee was an aristocrat that valued tradition and culture. Catton states that Lee believed that men were
Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) contribution to the United States as a war general and commander received positive connotations for his commitment, attitude and inspiration on the battlefield. However, it is debateable about his contributions because of Robert Lee’s association in the Civil War (1861-1865) to the Confederate Army that fought for the Southern States. Robert Lee lead many successful campaigns and battles including the following; helping defeat Mexican armies that lead to U.S land gains and westward expansion, battles against a more powerful army in the Civil War. Despite these achievements Lee’s loyalty for the Confederate Army that fought to uphold slavery undermines his success and is highly debateable about whether his contribution is justified or not. Robert Lee’s contributions to his nation begin before the Civil War in the Mexican-American War (1846-1848).
I would agree with both characters in certain ways since each captain showed different aspects that made themselves unique. Grant, for example, was a great soldier that only care about the future of the nation. On the other hand, Lee was the image everybody wanted to follow. His personality was higher than Grant’s, and his desire of keeping the old aristocratic mentality was the nation’s example of loyalty. But, they both had the same purpose which is keeping the American nation as one united country.
They both conquered a great deal of land. Both of their father were assassinated by their enemies. They were both born into leadership/ royalty. Their fathers were both leaders of their land. Soon after their fathers were killed they became leaders to their land and people.
In order to become a Chief Executive, both leaders had to be willing to sacrifice their life to the greater good, but the similarities