Throughout his Civil Rights campaign, Martin Luther King practiced nonviolence. No matter what he went through he would turn the other cheek. It was a successful strategy that earned him the publicity the movement needed. Martin Luther King Jr. religious preference was Christian and Malcolm X was a Muslim. He believed in Muslim laws.
Pyae Zone Ms. DePolo EN101-01 10/16/2016 Two Different Prophets Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very prominent African American leaders in history. The two leaders fought for what they believed was right in many different ways. Even though there are beliefs that the two would never agree on many issues, they seemed to have pursued the same goals: fighting to end exploitation, racism, and discrimination against blacks. Both leaders seemed to have been influenced by their parents, particularly by their fathers as well as their attitude towards white people.
Throughout his life he was able to influence many to stand up for what they believed in. Violence was the main way he tackled the issue of civil rights. Public boycotts, violent riots, and physical harm were just a few of the ways Malcom X protested. The biggest and most effective way he led the fight for civil rights was to completley cut certain businesses and people out of the lives of those suffering from segregation. Through the violent way of doing that he was able to accomplish large progress in civil rights.
Martin Luther King’s string of peaceful protests against the self-thought superior white race is what earned him the Nobel Peace Prize, Malcolm X spit hot fire against the white man’s oppression on African Americans, stating that they were blocking the path in civil rights progression. Both public figures fought for the same goal of equal treatment and opportunity, but the actions taken by this duo to reach this goal were anything but the same. When you have two ingenious men battling for the same cause, progression is bound to happen, another given is one will stride farther than the other, and in this case that’s exactly what Malcom X did. One of the reasons Malcom X and Martin Luther King were so different has to do with how they grew up,
On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped, what would be the first and only uses in the history of war, a nuclear weapon on the Japanese city of Hiroshima killing. 3 days later, the U.S dropped another atom bomb on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. The combined total of deaths is 129,000-226,000+ from both cities including those who died as a result of the effects of the bomb. There are 2 ways you can look at this, one being that the droppings were fundamentally the right thing to do, or the other being that it was morally wrong. This is where we turn to the Civil Rights Movement and arguably, the two most prominent leaders of the Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. and
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both were amongst the many people who helped the black community to overcome a lot of hardships, such as segregation. They grew up in the era where blacks and whites were not equal, blacks were below whites. Growing up and witnessing those actions of the whites made them want to fight for what's right. The black communities started to take a stand. Different groups were formed to help conquer segregation, such as the NOI.
The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.
He wanted peace with everyone in their community and wanted to protest agasint violence. Instead, Malcolm X's method was to create employment for their own community. Not only that, he wanted his community to learn how
Martin Luther king Jr and Malcolm X, two very great and very effective leaders our world has had. Both were influential, and both changed the world forever. Martin Luther King was a US Baptist minister and civil rights leader. He was a black lives activist who did so by peaceful protests and peaceful conversations. King always demonstrated nonviolent forms of getting his words out.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two great leaders during the civil rights movement. Until this day, they still appear in the media for their protests and famous speeches. They both argued that the world should be free from segregation and everyone should have equal rights. Both speakers got a lot of people’s attention due to their message and the actions they made. However, the difference between the two leaders was the approach they took to get their point across.
and Malcom X are two of the most affluential leaders in history their strategies could not be more contrasting. Malcom X was a leader who was much more willing to promote to idea of negative justice. The Cherokee Indians under the leadership of Malcom X would be led to construct an organized revolt against the American government even though it will be bloody. On the contrary Martin Luther King Jr. would lead the Cherokee Indians in an entirely different direction. Dr. King Jr. would instruct the Cherokee to revolt against the American government using organized and peaceful demonstrations.
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, two major personalities from the early 1960s, believed strongly in the reformation of an imbalanced American Civil Rights system. Both leaders were advocates of Civil Rights reformation, and both held that African American citizens had an historic right to the same privileges and protections offered by the Constitution of the United States of America. King and Malcolm X saw segregation as a viral disease that had infected the nation and marginalized black communities. Their approach to curing this infection and strengthening the country was quite different, however. Malcolm X believed in the movement of black nationalism, while Martin Luther King advocated a policy of non-violence.
Peaceful resistance to laws is positive for a free society. Take the opposite of peaceful resistance: violence. If a law is thought to be oppressive, violent resistance to it accomplishes nothing good. Violence is not conducive at all for a free society; there is already too much violence elsewhere. Violence begets violence, which leads to chaos.
The goals of the movement were the goals that both King and X aimed to achieve in their campaign for equal rights. Throughout the movement, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr, used very different methods during the Civil Rights Movement due to their childhood experiences, religious practices, and their ideologies of how to run their campaigns, which ultimately led to Malcolm X being less influential during the movement than Martin Luther King Jr. In the beginning, King and X grew up in very different situations in the 1920’s and went through many life changing events that made them who they were. King grew up in Atlanta, Georgia and was the son of a Baptist preacher.
He advocated for self-reliance and self-defense among black Americans and criticized mainstream African American organizations for not doing enough to help their members. This is evidenced by his saying in the 8th paragraph of Malcolm X’s In Support of Violence “The next scene was the “big six” civil rights Negro “leaders” meeting in New York City with the white head of a big philanthropic agency. They were told that their money-wrangling in public was damaging their image. And a reported 800,000$ was donated to a United Civil Rights Leadership council that was quickly organized by the “big six”.
