In the end, even though both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both have a similar goals,they both have diffrent way of achieving them. Malcolm X uses repetition to to bluntly state his purposes and to point out issues. Martin Luther King Uses parallel structure to refute what the clergymen had to say about the actions of the blacks and labeling him an extremist. Yet even though both malcolm X and Martin Luther king did use rhetorical question, they used it to serve different purposes. Malcolm X used it to get the audience thinking on what they should do next and how they did not accomplish anything, while Martin Luther King used it to question the Clergymen's way of thinking and to ask where the white christians were at when blacks were being
During the Civil Rights Movement there were many influential and important people that lead the movement, but there was no better leaders than Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Even though they both acted differently and had different ideas they both had a common goal, they were both essential in reaching it. One reason they were both needed in the civil right movement is both had extreme views on how to do things. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that peaceful protests were the best way to do things and also the most effective. Malcolm X on the other hand believed we should do whatever we need to do to achieve our goals whether it is violent or nonviolent.
In both sections of Document 2, many readers begin to realize that activists, such as King and Malcom X, wanted to make sure that Civil Rights movements was not only positive towards society, but was also handled accordingly in order for African Americans to become equal within society. However, Dr. King and Malcolm X demonstrated their difference in thoughts upon how the Civil Rights movements should be incorporated within society, especially when it came to violence. Document 2 demonstrates how both Dr. King and Malcolm X viewed their ideas of violence and how it contributed not only to their work within the movements, but also to the general historical aspect of society as we know it today. Dr King believed that the best way to contribute to the Civil Rights movement was to address the issue in a nonviolent manner. This manner included nonviolent aspects such as sit ins and marches in order to demonstrate a way of negotiating with the leaders within the world while also proclaiming the need for equality.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were both very influential icons in the civil rights movement. They both pushed people to start fighting for their rights and helped change the lives subsequent to their time. They both used different strategies in their speeches and type of protest which varied from peaceful to violent protest. Martin Luther King often encouraged for people to show their voices in a peaceful manner, whereas Malcolm X encouraged people to defend themselves using more brutish tactics. A famous quote from Dr. King is , “Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon.”
On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped, what would be the first and only uses in the history of war, a nuclear weapon on the Japanese city of Hiroshima killing. 3 days later, the U.S dropped another atom bomb on the Japanese city of Nagasaki. The combined total of deaths is 129,000-226,000+ from both cities including those who died as a result of the effects of the bomb. There are 2 ways you can look at this, one being that the droppings were fundamentally the right thing to do, or the other being that it was morally wrong. This is where we turn to the Civil Rights Movement and arguably, the two most prominent leaders of the Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. and
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both were amongst the many people who helped the black community to overcome a lot of hardships, such as segregation. They grew up in the era where blacks and whites were not equal, blacks were below whites. Growing up and witnessing those actions of the whites made them want to fight for what's right. The black communities started to take a stand. Different groups were formed to help conquer segregation, such as the NOI.
Malcolm X vs. Martin Luther King Jr. Whose Philosophy made more Sense For America In 1960 History 8B Addyson Gallagher Faith May 24, 2023 Two names come to mind when people think of breaking down racial barriers in America. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had the same goal but had different methods for gaining equal treatment. King was raised in a middle-class, Christian family and was told his whole life, "Do not let them make you feel you are not as good as White people.
Martin Luther King Jr's and Malcolm X's methods have a few simularities and a few differences. The issue focused on the Negro community struggled with boycott and violence. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X wanted their community to be saved. In this essay, I will be talking about the differences and simularities of the methods use to improve the economic conditions of African Americans. Even so, the Martin Luther King Jr's method was to emphasize a nonviolent arsenal and use the march as a "weapon" and try to stop violnce.
Martin Luther king Jr and Malcolm X, two very great and very effective leaders our world has had. Both were influential, and both changed the world forever. Martin Luther King was a US Baptist minister and civil rights leader. He was a black lives activist who did so by peaceful protests and peaceful conversations. King always demonstrated nonviolent forms of getting his words out.
Martin Luther King Jr (MLK). and Malcolm X definitely had their differences in many ways. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both played very big roles in the Civil Rights Movement whether it was their speeches or the Groups they led they had made an impact. MLK had a peaceful approach to gaining equal rights while Malcolm X had “by any means necessary” approach to equal rights. If you ask most people the most memorable thing about MLK is his speech starting with the words “I have a dream”.
The time of civil rights movement was an event where African Americans were fighting against racism and their freedom. Using protest, non-violence tactics, and a voice was a significant part of how African Americans got what they deserved. However, the Civil Rights Public figures were the ones that tied everything together. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most influential leaders of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s. Both were African American, and both were passionate about ending racial discrimination.
Malcolm X was a human rights activist mainly known for his advocacy for violence to inspire change in the black community. Although X is considered one of the most influential African American in history I do not agree with his beliefs that included violence instead of peace, making all white men the enemy , and pro segregation views. X believed that violence was the only way for African Americans to stop the injustice they had gone through for hundreds of years. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were similar in that they both wanted to stop the wrongdoings against African Americans but they both also had completely opposite ways of doing it. King in “Martin Luther King on Malcolm X” writes about how he first met X and what he truly thinks about his ways of receiving justice for African Americans.
During the Civil Rights Movement Era in the mid 1900’s, several activists emerged from society, trying to make changes regarding the treatment of African Americans. However, there were two individuals who made waves within American society amidst the protests, rallies and injustice directed towards blacks. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, jr., had two distinct outlooks and solutions for the issues facing African Americans. The upbringing of these men, and certain key events in their past shape the beliefs they spread to society, and their childhood, adolescence and early adulthood are nearly opposites. Malcolm Little, more popularly known as Malcolm “X” was born in Omaha, Nebraska in 1925.
Peaceful resistance to laws is positive for a free society. Take the opposite of peaceful resistance: violence. If a law is thought to be oppressive, violent resistance to it accomplishes nothing good. Violence is not conducive at all for a free society; there is already too much violence elsewhere. Violence begets violence, which leads to chaos.
Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were two of the most influential civil rights activists, their philosophies on how to approach the pursuit of equality greatly differed—especially in regards to the idea of otherness. King was a huge proponent of nonviolent protest in order to attempt to peacefully integrate blacks and whites without any unnecessary bloodshed. Malcolm X on the other hand believed that brute force and violence was the only feasible way to initiate the process of integration. From their vastly different ideologies about how to create change, they developed a difference in mindset about otherness and what the goal of their respective movements were. While King and Malcolm X both agreed upon the fact that blacks were
