Compare And Contrast Ravich Vs Gatto

631 Words3 Pages

Ravitch vs Gatto Schools are made to educate students and help the student find themselves. Also, schools help students prepare for the real world. In Ravitch’s article, The Essentials of a Good Education, she talks about how schools are willing to take out extra curricular activities to make more room for test prep classes. In Gatto’s article, Against School, he talks about how the school education system is not teaching the kids the right skills by making them go through the same routine daily. Ravitch views the current public education system focuses on standardized testing for mathematics and reading because schools want their students to do well on tests for the school, whereas Gatto’s views that the current public education system is bad because it turns students into robots going through the same daily routine. Students should not have to only focus on standardized testing while at school. Schools should also focus on helping their students learn life skills. Ravitch states, “The central purpose of education is to prepare everyone to …show more content…

Students need the extra curricular activities. Parents do not want to send their children to schools who only focus on standardized testing. Students should be able to take Art classes and learn foreign language. Learning a foreign language could help the student in the future because it would be easier to get a job. “Children (and even adults) who play an instrument 30 minutes a week over the course of a little over a year have more highly developed brains...The cortex, which undergoes the greatest changes when a second language is learned during childhood, influences thought and consciousness”(Boyd). This means that students need art and foreign language to help them develop into an adult. This matters because schools should not be allowed to take away extra curricular activities to make more room for test