Difference Between Classical Approach And Human Relations Approach

Introduction

The Human Relations approach and the Classical Approach are both management styles which are used within organisations and businesses. Both styles of management are complete opposites of the other. The Classical approach is aimed at getting workers to do their jobs done, while the Human Relations approach is aimed at motivating their employees to wanting to get their work done and enjoy the work while they go. Different companies favour different styles of management while others would benefit from trying to blend the two styles of management.

The Classical Approach

The classical approach has been developed since the early 1900 's. Many scientist had developed theory 's in management styles which they thought were best suited in order to achieve their goals. They done countless studies in order to record their findings. There were tests which showed the best way to get greater productivity from an individual by creating a structured working organization where the worker would get greater pay by climbing the "career ladder". This then motivated the workers to do the tasks their job required .

Other studies showed that employees which lacked ambition and enthusiasm for their job, was a result of

It is thought, that to build and maintain an organisation specific goals would need to be put in place in order to foresee the targets and objectives. Employees were viewed as extra "machines" which would be replaced if needs be. In contrast to the Human Relations approach, which would argue that the employees are the foundation of an organisation. The organisation has to set social interaction for its employees so that relationships and social and emotional needs are all used as the motivating factors in order to drive on the employees working performance which in turn leads to greater productivity by the