Comparing Sire And Hiebert Worldview And Ethics

1600 Words7 Pages

Anita Okoye
Worldview and Ethics
Dr.Kyle Martins
10/26/15
We are talking about the eight questions, comparing Sire and Hiebert worldviews, and how it is telling us the meaning in what Sire and Hiebert are looking for.
The primary beliefs and the presuppositions at heart of the modern worldview, (it is helpful to start with the Sire’s 8 questions from pp 22-23 of the Universe Next Door, though you may depart from these if something you want to say doesn’t fit neat into Sire’s list).
According to the question given in the book, starting with the prime real and reality of life and nature are assumed to be under the regulation of a God with human personality according to the books of Transforming worldviews and Paul says “ it is intentions …show more content…

God was seen as loving creator who encouraged his children and protected each course of worldly events according to his promises.
There is conflict in modern worldview is naturalism because the modern worldview is talking about reintroduction of Aristotelian dualism in western European though middle ages and creator the creation was God in naturalism the universe is closed system and not open to reordering from the outside either by transcendent being later at length by self-transcendent or autonomous human beings. On what is a human being the modern worldview and naturalism they conflict because in the modern worldview they say human beings are scared canopy that give meaning and security to human endeavors meaning they are gods of world but those gods were gods of power, violence, credulity, not of love, and benevolence while in naturalism human beings are complex machine, they were part mind and in the mind was different substance. It is the great majority of naturalists. Human beings are simply part of the …show more content…

In the battle between the people in the modern world view and Christian Theism, Christian Theism has lost its sacred canopy that gave meaning and security to human endeavors. Both modern worldview and Christian theism live in a life of thinking they are gods of world and gods of power, violence, and cruelty, not of love and compassion. In Christian theism, human beings are created in the image of God and possess character, state of grace, cleverness, principles, gregariousness, and creativity.
In modern worldview and Christian theism, they both exist within the same framework of life after death whereby, they believe either on renovation, and final conclusion. In Christian theism, death is either the gate to life with God and people, or eternal separation. Modern worldview and Christian theism have both the different framework. They individually agree that human beings can recognize the world around them and God himself; He is the maker of the world and of all in it. In the modern world view they believe in the orders and control by laws. This subject of the natural laws are consequently methods to discover and prove certain laws that define good and evil. On the other hand, Christian theism is a conflict by saying human beings were created good, but