Competitive Federalism

628 Words3 Pages

The principle of federalism seeks to limit the national government’s power, by placing more emphasis on the states to compete for citizens’ attention. It’s allowing the states to be more independent, appealing by pushing themselves to be better.
In regards to competitive federalism, it focuses on the states. It puts them to work by making them come up with their own tactics to gain citizen’s interest. The source brought up the situation of consumers, who are located in New York, going to New Jersey instead of New York for products because of the change in price. The states are trying to achieve the people’s favoritism so they compete. It can easily be compared to having the same type of stores across from each other trying to achieve the …show more content…

States compete just like businesses compete. They both want the most people. Also choices, since you want to give as many options as possible in both scenarios.
Mobility and choice are connected to federalism. Mobility is increased by the choices given to the people. Referencing the New Jersey situation again, people moved to where choices were in their favor. Also the technology advancements are allowing the spending mobility of the consumer to increase since products are easier to access. Federalism makes these choices possible. The choices are put in place because of the effects of federalism. In short, federalism causes choices, which in turn, causes the increase in mobility.
Federalism is a defender against centralization. Federalism is giving power to the states to do what they see is fit to keep the state moving effectively. Independence and responsibility is given to the states. Without this factor, centralization has the capability of taking over, which basically means government is so powerful that it controls all. People no longer have options, for the decisions will already be made for them. The popular concern is addressed by the use of federalism, as it helps regulate power distribution given to the government in terms of economic choices and actions