ipl-logo

Contract Law: Mary Beth V.

364 Words2 Pages
I believe that this contract should be valid, because both parties agree to surrogacy and Mary Beth, who is the surrogate parent, allowed the artificial insemination to be planted in her body to carry the Stern’s baby. They had a signed contract which clearly stated the end result. Their agreement had a promise and a consideration, but all of them were not legal. It is my opinion that once Mary Beth delivered the baby she should have given custody to the Stern’s immediately. A name should have been picked out by the Stern’s prior to the birth and Mary Beth should have put that name on the birth certificate to eliminate the step of the name change process. However, the emotional attachment that a biological mother (birth mother) may experience
Open Document