David Gewirtz Suicide

720 Words3 Pages

David Gewirtz is a contributor to ZDNet, and the author of Is Apple’s Suicide Factory Outsourcing to Even Cheaper Chinese Peasants? (Gewirtz). According to ZDNet, “He is featured in The History Channel special The President 's Book of Secrets, is one of America’s foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs” (“David Gewirtz”). His article, written in 2010, depicts the harsh treatments that Chinese employees face in conjunction with Apple production. According to David Gewirtz, the situation is much worse than society has imagined (Gewirtz). Apple products are primarily manufactured in China. David Gewirtz claims that it is implausible to assemble Apple products in America because the amount of money in …show more content…

David Gewirtz writes, “As of May 27, 16 people had attempted to take their lives by jumping off factory roofs (12 succeeded). At least 20 were stopped before they could jump” (Gewirtz).These numbers upset Terry Gou, the CEO of Foxconn. However, the difficulty of maintaining production in order to meet the needs of the people serves as a large problem. The high degree of desire that Apple has acquired contributes to the poor treatment of those employed within China. David Gewirtz describes the solution to such suicides, “The company strings nets between buildings as a way to catch jumpers” (Gewirtz). Those higher up in Foxconn realize that the situation is not exactly ideal, but perpetuate its use because it may protect a Chinese employee from falling to their death …show more content…

Several Americans depend on technological jobs; thus, if people no longer purchased electronics, many Americans will no longer be able to sustain their job. Also, the Chinese may become victims of unemployment. David Gewirtz makes the claim that although their jobs are far from ideal, they nonetheless allow for the ability for them to sustain themselves. David Gewirtz desires that Americans working within Apple reach out to Foxconn and prompt them to develop better working conditions, because the likelihood that the American people will refrain from purchasing the products is slim