ipl-logo

Death Row Inmates Vs Animal Testing Essay

495 Words2 Pages

Testing on humans, specifically, death row inmates would be better than testing on animals when it comes to medical research. Both scientists and doctors have scientifically proven that even though animals are biologically similar to humans, they are not identical. Stacy Vale Karron, the author of Death Row Inmates in Clinical Trials: The Benefits of Human vs. Non-Human Subjects stated " There is empirical evidence showing that animal "models" are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research, therefore medical experimentation on humans is more effective in clinical trials toward the discovery of cures for human diseases than medical experimentation on animals " ( Karron 1 ). Scientists and doctors say that …show more content…

Showing that not only are animals being tortured with the different types of tests; testing on humans is better than testing on animals. No only is it safer for the animals but more accurate conclusions from medical treatment when tested on the body that it would be put into. So by saying that, even though animals have been tested on, it is safer, more accurate, and cheaper to test on Death Row Inmates, than on animals. Even though testing on humans are more accurate and safer for animals, for death row inmates, medical histories of the inmates are more limited, genetic research would almost be impossible to conduct in prison populations, and are there even enough death row inmates to experiment on? From testing on animals they could be controlled, researchers say "From this, the researcher can see the benefits (if any) of the intervention, and begin to make conclusions knowing that the only thing that differed between the control group and the main group was the intervention." ( Tom Holder 4 ) The animals that are being tested on are made sure that food, temperature, liquid intake and their prior health are in positive affect. Tom compared the animals to humans, and stated, "This same is not possible with prisoners, whose medical history will be more

Show More
Related
1835 Words | 8 Pages

There are over 100 million animals harmed in US research labs every year. Ninety- two percent of the tests conducted on animals do not actually work when used on people (animal testing). Why use animals at all when researchers can just use humans...incarsaterated humans. In the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” researchers used HeLa cells on men in prison to test the effects of the cells in the human body. Chester Southam put an ad in the Ohio State Penitentiary newsletter for twenty-five volunteers for HeLa cells research.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

After Sun reassures readers that the animals are completely safe and pain-free, she is able to reinforce how animal testing is beneficial through sound research. “The truth behind animal testing,” explains how specific discoveries such as insulin, blood transfusions, penicillin, so on and so forth have been unearthed because of animal testing. Today, many people can relate to these medical advances because they are so commonly used in hospitals and the medical field. Sun’s research even introduces multiple cases where animal testing was successful. One such case included Charles Chamberland who was able to find a vaccine for both cholera and anthrax through animal experimentation with little harm to the chickens he was testing.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

According to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people.

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

Testing animals is not reasonable because of modern technology. For example, “cell-based methods, next-generation sequencing and ‘omics technologies and computational modelling techniques” assert to the extinct of animal testing (Burden, Natalie, Fiona Sewell, and Kathryn Chapman, 2). The amount of animals lives lost are not justified due to new alternatives. Human products should not be tested on animals because of genetic differences. Humans are animals.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

In “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in

Read More
400 Words | 2 Pages

Every day, thousands of animals are subjected to cruel, inhumane treatment. In the United States, there are many laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, but one of the most harmful ways of abusing animals is not only legal, but considered by many to be completely justified. The process described is that of animal experimentation, the act of performing experiments on an animal that can deliberately cause the animal suffering and even death. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unnecessary, inaccurate, and cruel to animals. Firstly, animal testing is an inaccurate and outdated means of gathering information.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Humanity has a history of experimentation on animals and death is what will come of it if animals continue to be treated inhumanely. On a daily basis animals are removed from their natural habitat and taken to labs to be tested on for human products. Animal experimentation has become a very popular method of research and testing. This procedure is most common in the United States and European countries, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom being the most popular.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing in the United States provides minimal benefits for the amount of pain and distress animals must endure. Animals are given artificially induced conditions, that they would not receive naturally, and experimented on. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated that ninety-four percent of drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials. The experimentation of animals is not only ineffective, but cruel and inefficient for the United States. With such negative affects alternate ways have been produced to combat the mistreatment of animals.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

Animal experimentation is a very noteworthy subject that has created quite a stir amongst the world. Anything from monkeys becoming anemic due to starvation to puppies with open sores from a new topical cream to relieve itching; animal experimentation is something that has been around since 129 AD. Testing human diseases or medicines on animals is factually not accurate, considering that there are so many differences between a human and a non-human animal. According to PETA, ASPCA, The Humane Society, and the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, they explain that animal experimentation can be avoided and is an unnecessary step in today’s testing. Most humans typically care for non-human animals and take

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing can also help us understand more than

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

However, both sides agree that it would be beneficial to reduce animal suffering by finding alternatives to this practice. On one side of the spectrum, supporters of animal testing point out how valuable the practice is to scientists, and the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research. According to the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), “…practically every drug, treatment, medical device, diagnostic tool or cure we have today was developed with the help of lab animals” (“Benefits of Biomedical Research”). The FBR is clearly stating that, without the help of animal testing, medical advances would be nearly impossible.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Many people have different ideas on animal testing and if it is or is not appropriate for medical research. Many disagree, but there are some that think it’s necessary for testing to be done. Animal testing is necessary because it helps develop life saving medical treatments for not only humans, but animals, and it helps determine how medicine will react to the human body. Animal testing is appropriate for medical research because testing helps develop life saving medical treatments for humans. Without testing, scientist wouldn’t have found ways to help people with breast cancer or childhood Leukemia.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More

More about Death Row Inmates Vs Animal Testing Essay

Related Topics

Open Document