Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

979 Words4 Pages

Animal testing in the United States provides minimal benefits for the amount of pain and distress animals must endure. Animals are given artificially induced conditions, that they would not receive naturally, and experimented on. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated that ninety-four percent of drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials. The experimentation of animals is not only ineffective, but cruel and inefficient for the United States. With such negative affects alternate ways have been produced to combat the mistreatment of animals.
The Animal Welfare Act was set in place in 1966 to regulate the use and care of animals tested in labs. This act exempts rats, mice, birds and cold-blooded from these regulations and can be treated any means deemed necessary by the scientists. The Humane Society International has stated the "Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies." (Humane Society International). The cosmetic …show more content…

The polio cases being reported at 350,000 people in the 1988 down to 27 cases in 2016. The director of the University of Texas M.D, Chris Abee, states that "we wouldn't have a vaccine for hepatitis B without chimpanzees," and says that the use of chimps is "our best hope for finding a vaccine for Hepatitis C, a disease that kills thousands of Americans annually." The removal of the pancreas from canines allowed scientist to discover insulin, allowing for an artificial alternative to be produced saving countless lives in America. The experimentation of animals has led to the creation and development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics, which benefits both animals and