ipl-logo

Annotated Bibliography On Animal Testing

619 Words3 Pages

Animal Testing -Rewrite In 2013, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine wrote, “Research Institutions Must Make the Replacement of Animals a Priority”, an article advocating replacing animals for medical research. The writer starts out by saying, “Animals used in medical research are frequently subjected to emotional stress, physical pain, and suffering. Scientists and institutions using animals for medical research and education should explore and implement non animal methods to the fullest extent possible, with the recognition that in some cases the practical challenges of developing non animal methods will not be overcome.” Concerns are raised when animals are subjected to pain and toxins during testing. Studies show stress on the animals from routine …show more content…

The Americans for Medical Progress is a nonprofit organization that promotes the public understanding and support of animal use in medicine testing. The organization claims that, “Despite claims by animal rights activists, it is undeniable that animal-based research has contributed to significant improvement in the length and quality of our lives”. With this being said, many advancements have been made in medicine because of animal use. Cancer, for example, has medicines that have contributed 10.7% to the life expectancy. Advancements have also been made to HIV/AIDS therapies where researchers use animal models to develop new medicines to help with the therapy of AIDS. Following this further, medicines are continuously being tested on animals to help with the treatments of strokes, diabetes, Parkinson’s, hepatitis C, birth defects and many more. Although The American for Medical Process organization agrees with most of society that animal testing is cruel, they also believe that there is no better way to further our medicines to one day find a

Show More
Related
510 Words | 3 Pages

While they do save countless live animal testing is not proven to always work on humans. Animal testing has been proven beneficial to life saving cures. In the Article, it states, “Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for generations. Is it alright to test new medication and risk the lives of innocent animals to help the future of human health? In this paper, we will research this topic, looking at both the pros and the cons, and at the end I will give you my opinion on the topic. We’ll look at the positives first. It has helped scientists discover many new cures and treatments for diseases.

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing has become increasingly controversial since its advent, dating back 150 years (Understanding Animal Research 1). While testing vaccines and drugs on animals has been a successful technique for scientists for decades, it may be seen as cruel and immoral by some because it involves harming and even killing over 100 million animals every year (Collins 1). However, this technique has prevented many dangerous drugs from reaching the public and proved to successfully change the lives of many struggling with diseases that were once thought to be incurable. Animal testing seems inhumane at times, but it has contributed to the development of many life saving treatments.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Animal experimentation is an extremely unique topic to write about because it isn’t every day that you hear about it in the news and I would like to bring it to people’s attention for that very reason. Animal experimentation leads as far back as 300-200 BC and has continued until this very day and will into the future. During testing, many animals are used including mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs/ hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats and dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates (monkeys, and in some countries, chimpanzees). Although animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments, the drugs that pass animal tests are not always safe for humans to consume or

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

The Ethics of using animals for testing for the purpose of advancement in medicine has been a controversial non ending argument. For many periods, researchers and scientist have used animals. Millions of animals are being researched, tested within the US every year. Most of this animals are not given pain medications or drugs. Some animals being use are as small as rodents, rats, mice, hamsters.

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

Each year, about 100 million animals are used for both scientific and commercial testing. From its genesis at around 500 BC, animal testing has remained a topic of great controversy. Media organizations have exposed these practices and organizations have been springing up rapidly in defense of animal treatment, but is it really a question of ethics or a series of fallacies? Science has proved the latter, as animal testing is not only a vital contributor to sustaining the human population but also an important constituent to biopharmaceutical research. Animal testing is a crucial component of medical research.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

For example, the sleeping pill Thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals and passed before its release ("Science Museum. Brought to Life: Exploring the History of Medicine"). Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market ("Vioxx Linked to Thousands of Deaths”). In conclusion, animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because it is cruel and inhumane, plus, drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe, and animals do not reliably predict the results in human beings. Because of these reasons, I believe that the current amount of animals being used for scientific or commercial testing is unacceptable and something needs to be done to help these animals.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

More than one hundred million animals are killed in laboratories each year in the United States alone. While animal studies have led to many life saving medical discovers, it comes with a cost: animal testing is extremely cruel. Animals should not be used for testing because it is inhumane, there are countless methods to replace animal testing, and animals do not make good test subjects for research used on humans. First, animals should not be used for testing since animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Over the years, there have been numerous accounts of animal cruelty in animal testing facilities.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

More importantly, animal testing is harming living creatures for records that is not 100% reliable and this could ultimately lead to a dangerous effect for the results of the products (Animal Testing is Cruel, 2008). As a fact 92% of experimental drugs passed by animal tests immediately failed after first tried on humans because animal’s response to drugs can be different to a human’s also they were too dangerous or didn’t work (Why animal testing is pointless, 2013). According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, over 100 stroke drugs have failed in humans after tested successful on animals, and over 85 HIV vaccines that were effective when tested on animals have failed in non-human primates (Animal Testing, 2014). In addition, due to serious or toxic adverse effects in humans, more than half of the few drugs approved are later withdrawn or relabelled. For example, in 2004 the arthritis drug Vioxx appeared to be safe in animal studies, but after causing over 60,000 deaths in U.S. was inhibited from the market.

Read More
254 Words | 2 Pages

Animal testing is a highly controversial subject, disputed among many. It is evidently not pleasant to animals, but it is extremely beneficial for scientific findings. Some say it is a necessary evil, and some say it is animal cruelty. Others cannot simply make up their minds about this subject. Although many people are against animal testing, it must continue due to medicine development, advantages of testing animals over other subjects, and the regulated experiments for the animals’ safety.

Read More
2097 Words | 9 Pages

However, both organizations reported that animal tests have 92% failure rate on predicting the safety and effectiveness of medicines (“Soundearth.com,” 2010). In most of times, animal testing includes: pain, discomfort, and anxiety which ultimately leading animals to being killed or euthanized (“Soundearth.com,” 2010). Attempting to defend the rights of animals might seems as a challenging task, since the custom of animal testing have been used in past decades without doubt it. But however, a middle ground must be established that to avoid cruel and unnecessary abuse of animals while accepting in biomedical research (Gannon,

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

For years, scientist, doctors, and researchers have been using controversial methods to make new medical breakthroughs. They started thousands of years ago on human and animal corpses. However, nowadays researchers use controversial methods of testing for many reasons, including testing a new drug to seeing what affect a new mascara will have. But now researchers are using living animals to test these products. These new tests hurt hundreds of animals, are inhumane, most of the time do not work, and goes against all teachings of kindness.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not a reliable way to test medicines, animal testing is wasteful and dangerous, and above all animals are not like us. To begin, Animal testing is not a reliable way to test medicines. According to Cruelty free international “It is not surprising to find that treatments showing ‘promise’ in animals rarely work in humans”. This shows that animals

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

“Over eighteen million animals are used in research and experimentation in the United State” ( Lubinski 4). Some people truly do not think animals should be used for medical testing. Animals are medically tested to find cures for human diseases or to make sure chemical products are safe to be around humans. But while being tested, animals are harmed, given diseases, and even killed by the chemicals without a say in doing so. Even though animals are a different species they still are living and should be respected.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

16 billion taxpayers’ dollars are spent in the United States annually on animal testing, but there are cheaper, and equally effective, solutions (“Petition”). Scientists are now able to to exercise microdosing, a technique for studying the behaviour of drugs in humans through the administration of doses so low they are unlikely to produce whole-body effects, but high enough to allow the cellular response to be studied, on humans because there is no impact on the test subject (“ProCon”). Not to mention, animals are very different from humans and this produces flawed results. We also can’t understand the animal's reaction to the administered drug, making it impossible to know if the medicine works or if it doesn’t (“Using Animals”). Finally, testing on animals is just plain cruel and very inhumane.

Read More

More about Annotated Bibliography On Animal Testing

Open Document