ipl-logo

Animal Testing: Beneficial To Life Keeping Humane

510 Words3 Pages

If you had a choice to test an animal to save your child would you? Animal testing has been proven to work throughout the years but, as we evolve more and more there have been things that could substitute testing. “Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 bc”. “Animals used in the experiment commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation etc.” Animal testing while seeming inhuman there are some beneficial sides to testing on animals. While they do save countless live animal testing is not proven to always work on humans.
Animal testing has been proven beneficial to life saving cures. In the Article, it states, “Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 …show more content…

Animal testing while seeming inhuman there are some beneficial sides to testing on animals. While they do save countless live animal testing is not proven to always work on humans.Although the vaccine worked on the animal it is not always proven to successfully work on humans. Although the vaccine worked on the animal it is not always proven to successfully work on humans. Animal testing brings medical breakthroughs while still keeping humane. After reading this essay you decide what is the best way for medical

Show More
Related
1004 Words | 5 Pages

After Sun reassures readers that the animals are completely safe and pain-free, she is able to reinforce how animal testing is beneficial through sound research. “The truth behind animal testing,” explains how specific discoveries such as insulin, blood transfusions, penicillin, so on and so forth have been unearthed because of animal testing. Today, many people can relate to these medical advances because they are so commonly used in hospitals and the medical field. Sun’s research even introduces multiple cases where animal testing was successful. One such case included Charles Chamberland who was able to find a vaccine for both cholera and anthrax through animal experimentation with little harm to the chickens he was testing.

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

Although animal testing is beneficial in some cases, it is cruel and unjustified because of the daily conditions animals have to suffer through, and how unnecessary it is considering the amount of different alternatives. II. Animal

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing has become a double-edged sword topic all around the world. Researchers believe that it is morally ethical to conduct extreme research procedures on animals when it is unethical to conduct on humans. Research is responsible for many medical breakthroughs and an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Medical research with the help of animal testing has prevented hepatitis B, measles, etc. (Karayiannis et al. 2004).

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Experimentation: Is it Beneficial? Animal testing, otherwise known as vivisection has been around prior to the 19th century, in fact, in 1973 there was already a total of over 1,500,000 animals being experimented on. Britain was the first to stand up against animal testing, stating that it was cruel in 1876 with the Cruelty to Animals Act. America on the opposing hand, launched an animal testing boom in the first quarter of the twentieth century when cosmetic animal testing began when totals reached over 1,300,000 animals tested. The animal testing controversy has been a big one, it is no way beneficial to society nor is it humane for animals.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

These tests done to animals have improved the lives of many humans who would have suffered greatly. The testing of laboratory animals is an acceptable form of medical research. Today laboratory animal testing has come a long way but the animals are animals treated cruelly in testing, that is why the welfare

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

In the end, the advantages and pros of animal testing outweight the cons. Animals need to be used for testing because it advances medical practices, safely tests on animals, and saves both animal and human lives alike. The first reason animal testing

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Methods of testing devices exist; they are used as often as they possibly can be. However, there are still times when these materials don’t work well enough. Animal testing is only used when it is absolutely essential. Finding a way to keep humans alive and healthy is definitely one of those times of

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing has been around for thousands of years and has strong support and opposition. Animals are used to test everything from makeup, to medicine, and household chemicals. Those who are in favor of using animal testing are looking to save human and animal lives as well as reduce human pain and suffering. Those against animal testing say that animals often are not similar enough to humans and that they suffer unnecessarily. In order to know about animal testing, it is important to know about its history, benefits, and negative effects.

Read More
1589 Words | 7 Pages

Animal testing is it worth it or not? “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. We all drank the kool-aid on that one, me included. The problem is that it hasn 't worked, and it 's time we stopped dancing around the problem. We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans” said by Dr. Elias Zerhouni, former director of the National Institutes of Health (8 Expert Quotes Admitting That Testing on Animals Is Unreliable, page 2).

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

Another argument is animals are not inhumanely abused in labs because in some labs medicines are screened before injecting or force feeding, doses given to animals are only toxic to them if given a high amount, and sometimes medicine is given to people first, then tested on animals to see what went wrong (understandinganimalresearch). Inhumane means without sympathy, and force injection and feeding is not done with sympathy. Also, the labs who test on animals make no effort to have compassion for the animals scared or lonely mental state. Lastly, people argue that animal testing is effective because animals can suffer from a similar disease that can also develop in people (animalreasearch.info). This is not significant because it is on a very rare occasion an animal can have the same disease as a person, and it is virtually impossible for the two diseases to be the exact same.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

The animals that are used are treated badly at the laboratories, they are abused and end up being killed basically from all of the tests they are forced to go through. In some cases, the animals are forced to become addicted to drugs, alcohol and even tobacco. From all the tests, the animals experience a tremendous amount of stress on a day-to-day basis, no living thing should have to go through that just to make someone more money. The stress that they get may also affect the way that the tests results can turn out, this proving that animals being used for testing in research is not good in any circumstance. As stated by Cimons, “We have cured cancer in mic for decades-

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

After reading so many stories about the negative side of animal testing, then is there any positive affect about animal testing? The answer is yes, according to the article “Animal research is a source of human compassion, not shame” posted by Lancent. It points out the idea of the use of animals in medical research has save many people’s life. Without animal testing, there will be much less medical improvement than what we have right now, and there will be no new drugs for new or hard-to-treat diseases (815.

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Is it ethically wrong to kill or injure an animal through scientific experimentation? The Care of animals should have an important chapter in the future of bioethics. Nonhuman animals have been tested in biomedical research. Scientists and researchers believe that animal testing has many benefits on different implementations, mainly for medical research as vaccines and the investigation of the cure of diseases.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Whether this is morally right or wrong, I will present both sides of the argument as well as my opinion. PROS OF ANIMAL TESTING Nearly every nobel Laureate in physiology or medicine since 1901 has relied on animal research. Animal testing has decreased heavily over the years, with not very necessary things like makeup. Without animal testing we wouldn't have the many of the surgerys that we can today such as hip replacement surgery, kidney transplants, heart transplants, or blood transfusions.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

A very good example of why we need to test on animals is the Thalidomide Disaster. In the 1950s-60s The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ran tests to determine if it was safe to use. The Thalidomide drug was given out to pregnant women to help cure morning sickness. Instead of helping, it killed many babies, and approximately 15,000 babies were born with limb defects. This drug was tested on animals, but all the necessary test were not ran to insure the safety of consumer.

Read More

More about Animal Testing: Beneficial To Life Keeping Humane

Related Topics

Open Document