ipl-logo

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

800 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Testing on animals debate

From ancient times, some live animals such as rabbits and mouse have been used for scientific research around the world. These methods of testing have been a controversial topic discussed by the scientists. While some scientists believe that animal testings are essential for their experiments, others doubt the value of animal testings. This paper examines both the arguments for and against using live animals for scientific research and provides suggestions based on these arguments.

A number of scientists advocate the use of live animals in scientific research. They think that animal tests can improve their understanding of medical knowledge. According to ProCon Organization (2016),’’animals and humans are so biologically similar, they are susceptible to many of the same conditions and illnesses, including heart …show more content…

Ellen Frankel & Jeffrey (2001) considered that testings should be using human instead of animals for good scientific reasons. Although some of the animals are similar to human, the DNA are different. As a result, the side effects that made by the medicine on animals and humans may not the same. Moreover, the size of humans are different from the animals, the same dose of drug may harmful some small size animals like rabbits but do not have effects on humans.

It is clear that there are both advantages and disadvantages to using live animals for scientific research. Animal testings may improve the understanding of medical knowledge and advance the health of human beings. These benefits, however, using the life of animals and include some inappropriate treatments to those testers. A great deal of animals using in the tests are dead because of harsh environment. In addition, animals are not as same as humans because they have different DNA and size, so the result of those researches that using animal tests are

Show More
Related
987 Words | 4 Pages

“A Question of Ethics” by Jane Goodall and “Animal Research Saves Lives” by Heloisa Sabin presents two sides of the same coin in regards to Animal testing. Thereby, questioning the validity or necessity of animal research and testing today. In “A Question of Ethics” by Goodall she presents a scenery of the living conditions of the animals which are often isolated; posing the ultimate questions of, whether animal research is essential to medical research? Or How many tests are performed only to conform to laws and not out of scientific merit? The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

Animals may have similar body functions, but they can be prone to and resistant to different diseases which makes them unreliable to be tested. For example, cancer was cured in mice years ago, but human cancers are yet to be cured. This clearly shows that animals need to not be tested because of health and body differences. In addition to body functions, animal 's DNA are different than a human being’s.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Ethics- Pro Animal Research There is a large number of people who would disagree with the statement that “Animal testing is very beneficial” but what these people don’t realize is that without animal testing we wouldn’t have all the medical advancements that we have today. Animal testing has made a huge impact on our daily lives and will affect our future to come. According to Alec Baldwin, “One cannot be ‘single issue’ when it comes to medical research.” Baldwin’s mother is apart of the Breast Cancer Research Fund, she stated that “This year, approximately 182,800 women in the United States will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, and approximately 40,800 women will die from breast cancer.”

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

There are multiple controversies of the use of animals for testing and research purposes. This particular subject has become a debatable issue due to the labels given. For example many say the decision of using animals it considered animal cruelty, or that they have alternative methods to achieve the same outcomes. By looking at previous research we have had a great understanding of multiple health conditions Polio, Tuberculosis, and many other types of Cancer. One of the medical accomplishment of all time from animal examination has been the creations of medications and vaccines.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing is a helpful way to push our species towards advancement in medicine and

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

They also say that information from an animal doesn’t apply on a human being, but there are enough similarities between humans and animals to apply the test results. Also, animal rights supporters say that animal

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

In the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, she sums up the average truth and beliefs of someone who knows that this form of testing should be outlawed due to the unreliability of accurate results. In this article, Aysha reveals the validity and unreliability of testing on animals due to the differences in a growing and developing body compared to a helpless non-human animal with a different body make-up. She clearly discusses the number of animals that are being tested annually, “more than 115 million” (Akhtar, p. 407), with either human diseases or medical products. She goes on to say that obviously, medications and diseases should be further researched and have a prior evidence basis before being in contact with humans, though testing on such helpless animals that are not nearly as close to humans as they assume, give a unlikely truth to the results and do not clearly show the effects of medications or diseases would have on the average human (Akhtar, p.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

As a result of their cruel action the lab ended up being closed (Ericson, 2014). Moreover, there are insignificant similarities between humans and animals that make them poor testing subjects. It is imperative to note that human beings react differently to drugs as compared to animals; therefore, if the use of animals in experiments persists, they may not derive the most desirable outcome (Webster, 2014). Despite the fact that mammals and humans have some similarities in the body structure, they react differently to some medicines. For example, guinea pigs die after consuming Penicillin and cats die from Aspirin (Burnett, 2009).

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

However, both sides agree that it would be beneficial to reduce animal suffering by finding alternatives to this practice. On one side of the spectrum, supporters of animal testing point out how valuable the practice is to scientists, and the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research. According to the Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), “…practically every drug, treatment, medical device, diagnostic tool or cure we have today was developed with the help of lab animals” (“Benefits of Biomedical Research”). The FBR is clearly stating that, without the help of animal testing, medical advances would be nearly impossible.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

In spite of that, some people believe that animal testing is not essential and it should be banned because animals are different from humans physically. In addition, they believe that animal tests are a waste of time and money and there are lower cost alternative methods and more effective. Our purpose of this essay is to prove that animal testing is important and has a lot of benefits and advantages for humanity. Using animals in medical and scientific experiments is necessary, because it finds many cures and treatments, animals bodies are almost similar to the human bodies, also it benefits the animals themselves from diseases.

Read More

More about Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

Related Topics

Open Document