ipl-logo

Democratic Decision-Making In The Roman Republic

1137 Words5 Pages

The Roman Republic primarily emphasized the idea of a balance of powers. The veto, which grants assemblies the authority to stop proposed laws or decisions from being implemented, was one of the most significant tools under this system. We will look at the veto in Roman politics and how it affected democratic decision-making in this essay. We will specifically look at the numerous veto powers in the Roman Republic and how they affected the administration of laws and legislation. We will also discuss the veto system's benefits and drawbacks, and its effectiveness in fostering democratic decision-making.
The Romans had multiple types of vetos associated with each of the governing bodies. The legislative body of Rome had “three elements, each …show more content…

(9a Histories,12, p.9) When Rome was making the transition from monarchy to the Republic, counsuls preserved many of the privileges associated with monarchs. They had authority over both civil and military affairs, foriegn and domestic affairs, appointing new senators, and could punish if they saw fit. (9a Histories,12, p.9) To prevent a consul from acting without the consent of the other, each consul had the power to veto the decisions or actions of the other. This consular veto system was established to prevent consuls from abusing their power or acting against the interests of the Roman …show more content…

Although some groups within the legislative body of the Republic had some overlap over another group, the duties and powers were distinct enough that the citizen body had some form of representation. Additionally, because of the veto powers that each group possessed, it could be presumed that if a group vetoed some legislation or policy because ot would not benefit the state, nor the citizen body, it would be fair to assume that the veto facilitates democratic decision making. The role of the veto had significant impact on the administration of legislation and policies, but ultimately allowed for a way to ensure democratic decision making within the Roman

Show More
Related
327 Words | 2 Pages

Rome’s constitution had three different elements which held independent powers and shared their ideas to prove the constitution was democratic. The consuls and magistrates were the supreme masters of government and called together the People’s Assemblies to carry out whatever the majority of what the Assemblies decided (Doc A). Polybius also greatly admired how the Romans structured their

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

(Document F) As stated in and reflected in a fresco of the Roman Senate by artist Macari (Document F), the Senate had responsibilities and rights, among others, to control war, make foreign alliances, as well as control of public lands among others. While the Greeks may have had more equal representation, it was only through a quorum that they could conduct business (Document E). Athens also ostracized people who became powerful and were seen as a threat, and it was difficult to fulfill their responsibilities of citizenship (Document

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

What needs to be taken into consideration is, that Rome’s Senate size was smaller, allowing for more efficient decision-making processes compared to Athens’ direct democracy. This categorization system was an essential part of Roman society, helping maintain order and allocate resources fairly. Without it, chaos would have ensued, and the city would not have been able to function properly. As such, we should recognize the crucial role that the censors played in the development of ancient Rome and its lasting impact on history. A brilliant move by the Roman leaders was their creative approach to granting citizenship to foreigners, by using unique methods.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Polybius goes on to say, “no one can say for sure whether the constitution is an aristocracy or democracy or despotism” in Document A. He then explains how the Roman Republic was each of them, an aristocracy, a democracy, and a despotism, for various reasons. One of these reasons was that, at times, the consuls, or the magistrates, and the Senate had more power than the Assemblies, but in different situations, it was the opposite. This shows that even Polybius, a man who was actually alive during the Roman Republic, didn’t know how to label

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

Imperial Rome had a democratic government, where the people voted for everything. They had two classes, the patricians and the plebeians. The Plebeians had all the control over the Senate and the Consuls for a while. Eventually, the plebeians were given control over the Tribunes to give them a voice. The patricians were the wealthy, land owners, and the upper class citizens.

Read More
2227 Words | 9 Pages

The Roman Congress Good Bad Indifferent Rome, founded in 753 BC will become one of the greatest civilizations the world has ever seen. This paper will highlighting key aspects of the Roman Senate. The Formation of the Senate, positions within the Senate, elections, how legislation was passed, and Instances of bribery or extortion in the Senate. The progression of Rome as a civilization and as a Mediterranean super power is one of the most thoroughly studied cultures in the world today.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate was a group of legislators that was selected from the elite and wealthy class The Senate had two co consults to keep each other in balance There was a dictator that controlled everything when the Republic was in danger Caesar conquered several lands with the help of Pompey and Crassus By 48 BCE, Caesar was in control of all of Rome’s holdings

Read More
284 Words | 2 Pages

Polybius believed that this system of checks and balances made the Roman constitution one of the most stable and long-lasting forms of government in the ancient world. According to Polybius, the Roman monarchy provided stability, while the aristocracy represented the interests of the rich and influential classes, and the people's assembly (the democracy) supplied a voice for the ordinary people. He believed that the mix of these three elements

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

However, the President does not have as much power in the Senate as the Princeps Senatus Would have had. The power is evened out, allowing the President to vote in the Senate in the case of a tie. Unlike in the Roman Senate the power of the President and Vice President is controlled by strict rules, these rules are put in place to keep Senators and leaders from overstepping their authority. The powers that the Senate has are written in the constitution, and different from the other branches of government. For example, if the house of representatives recommends an impeachment, it has to go through the Senate first.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

The elected Magistrates and the the Senate, and the Assemblies and Tribunes each had certain roles in order to prevent any one person or group of people from gaining too much power. The Magistrates kept a check of the Senate, but at the same time the Senate did have the power to not give money to the magistrates, the assemblies had the right to reject laws that were approved by the Senate, and the Tribunes did have the power to veto officials' actions (Wasson, 2015). As it can be seen, this system is meant to provide room for each position to check one another so that one does not become more powerful than the

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

Augustus had made many important reforms in his rule, by having to control everything in Rome and making the senators work for him to build and do the thing for him. The senates were an advisory body whose advice becomes law via the consuls, praetors, and by confirmation by the assemblies of the citizens in Rome. Augustus had mad the laws so strongly that if women or a man do anything behind his back, he willpower send them to a different region, and get them killed by putting them with the animals to die. When Augustus made the laws across he directly made his plans to the people to present his Tribunician

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

The General Assembly and Senate established a sense of importance in Rome. The General Assembly was made up of Plebeians, and the Senate consists of Patricians. The terms General Assembly and Senate are two of many terms still used in the US Government today. The Romans were led by a king who was approved by the senate and a vote of the people, which is also displayed in the US Government. This is displayed in our presidential elections.

Read More

More about Democratic Decision-Making In The Roman Republic

Related Topics

Open Document