Kamehameha and George Washington also had quite a few differences about how they ruled their country. One major difference is how they used the tax collected from citizens. Since Hawaii was a prominent trading center, Kamehameha utilized the tax, which consisted of different items, and gave it to the ali’i of different ahupua’a (HawaiiHistory.org). Conversely, Washington used the tax, which was money, to repay the national debt since the US had recently been in a war. Moreover, another considerable difference is about the national boundaries.
When kamehameha was king he made to safer for his people this mean both of the them help their people advance their community. Hitler decided become president but lost by 36.8 percent so he entered a series of plan to have power. Kamehameha presented the dead king of Hawaii so he can be king even though this will cause war, this show that they are both persistence to have power.
However, how did he earn to be on the historic golden coin? Yes, King Kamehameha I had a great vision to unite Hawaiian Islands under one rule. King Kamehameha I should be on the historic coin because he was a powerful, wise, and brave leader. The first reason why King Kamehameha was powerful was that he became a mighty conquer.
Kamehameha was a warrior before the unification of the Hawaiian Islands. Kamehameha was just a district chief on the Big Island and Kamehameha soon ruled the Big Island after he and his men became stronger, He soon ruled other islands one at a time until eventually he had unified all the Hawaiian islands. Kamehameha was very smart in battles, using foreign weapons and foreign battle strategies then Kamehameha became an administrator after the unification. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was smart, cared for the land, and cared for his
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he strictly enforced the kapu system. If a Hawaiian broke a rule such as “splintered paddle”, they would be severely injured or put to death. Kamehameha did this to strengthen his control and make sure others wouldn’t break a rule. This is an example that remained the same after unification. This was good because this kept Hawaii safe and peaceful.
What do you think about Nixon and Obama 's approach to health care? Nixon 's plan seems more comprehensive -- "socialist," you might say -- than the one passed under Obama 's administration. Keep in mind, Nixon had a top marginal tax rate of 70%, while the current top rate sits at 39.6%. Let 's not forget that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created under the Nixon
One reason why Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was resourceful. For example, since everyone was cutting too much sandalwood it might of been extinct. As a result “he placed a kapu on young trees in order to conserve the natural resource” (26). This changed after the unification because before the unification there was no kapu on the sandalwood. This
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was insightful, respectful, and intelligent. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was a respectful administrator. He realized that after his passing, the other chiefs would sell all the sandalwood and let the species of trees go extinct. Therefore, he put a kapu on the young sandalwood to let it grow to its full potential. This was something that had changed because before the unification and trading there wasn’t a very great need for sandal wood.
King Kamehameha was the first person to unify all the Hawaiian Islands under one ruler. He was givin up at birth and was passed on to Kalaniopu’u, the highest chief of Hawai’i. Although Kamehameha wasn’t in line to be the highest chief of any island, he eventually took over all the islands one by one. Kamehameha was an effective leader because he could adopt to new ideas, he stuck to old systems if they were effective, and he put up new rules if needed to be made to protect his people and his land. Kamehameha was a strong and effective leader because he could adopt to new ideas.
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was intelligent. He was intelligent because he made a kapu to protect young trees. He did this so his kingdom will not run out of this natural resource. This was something that changed because sandalwood was a newly developed trade and resource. This was good because now Kamehameha’s kingdom will not run out of trees as their natural resource.
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he was kind and humble. Kamehameha is a good example of kindness because he cared for his people. As a result, he enforced the kapu and made another kapu named mamalahoe, which was a kapu for punishing robbery and murder with death. This is an example that both remained and changed after the unification. This example was a good action that Kamehameha took.
Kamehameha and Mohanda Gandhi were both effective leaders because they were persuasive, they both had a crucial effect on the society, and they both were very convincing to other people. Gandhi came from a low-class family in India, his father was a chief minister of Porbandar and his mother was a practitioner of Vaishnavism. Gandhi was appalled by discrimination that he experienced during his immigration in South Africa. Kamehameha was raised by his uncle, Kalani`opu`u who was the former ruler of the Big Island. Kamehameha’s conquest was to unite all the Hawaiian islands, and he was able to succeed.
Films are a great way of communicating a message to the viewers. One of the most controversial topics conveyed is politics and for this reason, Mr Smith Goes to Washington is a movie that explores the American political system through the life of Senator Jefferson Smith a newly elected politician. He comes out as a radical after realising that he cannot serve the interest of those who elected him to the government. The director of the film explores a radical sense ideological spectrum through a character who maintains integrity in the midst of harsh criticism in the political system. The director is radical trying to anger the political class and then win acclaim from the public.
Life in West Germany was very similar to how we live life here in the United States, people lived a “normal” life and were uncontrolled. In East Germany there was no capitalism and jobs were decided for you, but they did have a high employment rate because of this. When the wall fell in 1989, the western ways made their way to eastern Germany
They are now the third global source of FDI. Also they are the first investor in China. Globalization also had some disadvantages for Germany. For instance, in terms of capital, German
