However, Harjo needs to remember that numbers can 't "talk," but they can tell you as much as your human sources can. In order to get confident results we need a big sampling size. The bigger the sample size, the less likely errors are to occur. “For a 95% confidence level, which means that there is only a 5% chance of your sample results differing from the true population average’ a good estimate of the margin of error, or confidence interval, is given by 1/√N, where N is the number of participants or sample size”(Niles) In essence, Harjo’s main problem lies not so much in her ability to win us over as a reader emotionally and ethically. She is primarily unsuccessful in raising counterpoints to her position and her logical appeal.
For many people, this logic-based approach is highly effective because the supporting evidence is stable and unbiased, as opposed to Cepeda's emotional beliefs. Moreover, including these scientific studies that enhance her argument builds her reputation as a logical and trustworthy author. If readers view her as trustworthy, they are more likely to listen to her message because they feel her opinions are rooted in facts, thus reinforcing the effectiveness of her
See Susan J. Stabile, One For A, Two For B, And Four Hundred For C: The Widening Gap In Pay Between Executives And Rank And File Employees, 36 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM 115, 118 (2002) (identifying shareholder primacy philosophy as the cause of the dramatic disparity between executive pay and that of other workers). See also Estlund, supra note 65, at 950 (noting that product market competition has increased with globalization and this has encouraged employers to pursue a low-wage strategy);
(Stretten 524) Smartly using this essential quote, she supports her argument and thus provides undeniable statistics that condemn the imagery of Native
Throughout the essay Silko provides anecdotal evidence and facts to support her
Stephanie Coontz uses different ways to argue for her beliefs. Her article is written in a formal tone and the choice of words and phrases indicates a high education level. This is also expressed in her great use of numbers. Her main way of arguing is through logos, as she backs up her assertions with statistic facts numerous times. An example is when she compares how girls and boys have done in school lately.
Some will agree with his points while others will not. Either way, Fea skillfully presented supporting evidence to his point. The most important evidence Fea provided lies within the astounding details of the primary source documents that he incorporated throughout his text. Additionally, he presented the arguments of the differing views of the sources in question. He interwove his sources that would convince some to at minimum understand each sides view.
Both Herbert’s and Staples’ articles have examples of claims with great supportive evidence and claims that are lacking evidence. An excellent example of a claim followed by supportive
Furthermore, the type of examples Kluger, Aciman, and Steinmetz utilize involve strong data and facts to support their piece and make it more convincing. To illustrate, they describe, “ Just since 2004, the share of Americans who identify themselves as optimists has plummeted from 79% to 50%, according to a new Time poll. Meanwhile, more than 20% of us will suffer from a mood disorder at some point in our lifetimes and more than 30% from an anxiety disorder. By the time we 're 18 years old, 11% of us have been diagnosed with depression” (Kluger, Aciman, and Steinmetz 2). Given that their audience consists of more educated, well-read people, this evidence is particularly useful due to the fact it contains numbers and data that prove the writer 's’ main point and persuade their readers.
O'Reilly even found that unequal pay cascades down all the way to the senior management from the
Shining some much-needed sunlight on the gender wage gap will make a difference for every one of us, men and women, right now.” (www.nytimes.com, 16). “It’s the twenty-first century, and the gender wage gap affects the daily life of women throughout the country, at every economic level, from cashier to CEO. Is it fair? No.
¬In July, interim Kentucky State University president Raymond Burse, a retired General Electric executive, took a voluntary $90,000 pay cut to boost wages of the school’s lowest-paid workers from $7.25 to $10.25 an hour (Johnston, 2014). So even if the business can afford to payout the money, it would benefit the business to pay its employees more, which in turn would make for a better working environment and could be shown to produce
Throughout the piece, he uses strong examples which provide credibility,
The wage gap has been going on for a very long time and even though we are now in the 21st century, you would have thought that it would have been better by now, but it’s not. Sexism
Evidence for the claim You have great stories, but I believe you need to support you claim with statistics and facts. Evidence provided does not support the main claim. The essay did not have a work-cited page.
