ipl-logo

Dogs Should Not Be Used For Animal Experimentation

451 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why is animal testing unnecessary

Our society likes to have the latest and greatest products. People don’t realize how unethical animal testing really is. But, animals suffer physical damage, and we already have plenty of products, we don’t need any more.We can grow human cells in labs so that we don’t have to test on animals. Animal testing is unethical and unnecessary, because animals suffer for products we do not need, and don’t need to be tested on because there is technology to test products on human cells ethically.

When animals are tested on, they suffer physical damage. Animals are given painful injections. They are also bathed in chemicals which can burn and irritate their skin. Parts of their body are even removed for some tests. In Dogs Should Not Be Used for Animal Experimentation, it says “Experimenters try to mimic human disease by artificially inducing the condition, or its consequences, in animals.” Most commonly, dogs are used in toxicity tests, “which rarely use any form of pain relief.” The symptoms they suffer include “vomiting, diarrhoea, convulsions, shivering, anorexia and hyperexcitement; plus eye, liver, kidney, heart and lung damage, and of course death.” This is very unethical. It is also completely unnecessary. …show more content…

They make for more accurate tests. This is a harmless solution. According to the CEO of Human Society International, Andrew Rowan, growing human cells means “animals would largely disappear from toxicity testing programs”. It is more cost and time effective says Rowan: “risk evaluation of chemicals will be conducted in a fraction of the time, at a fraction of the cost.” Several major companies are looking to make this change. We already have plenty of products, we don’t need any more that involve animal

Show More
Related
796 Words | 4 Pages

This research is unfair and animals in this test don’t understand anything that is going to happen to them. Furthermore, animals “suffer painful procedures and isolations”(Source A) that really impacts the way scientists are saving human lives. However if we don’t stop animal testing, we could save lives but we won’t be helping the innocent animals the could be endangered and-and almost instinct. There are also alternatives that scientist could use to see if the product they have created could impact human lives. I think that if scientist test one cell organisms they could find the result of the experiment and see what could impact the entire body of a human or an

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Think about how many animals died in the making of your shampoo and body wash. Scientific research like drugs, cosmetics and food additives forced animals into cruel and painful testing. Animals may not be able to communicate or have rights like humans but they have the right to live a life with no torture. Animal rights movements have been ongoing since the nineteen- sixty’s. Advocates of this group want to express that animals should have rights just like humans.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Life is based on love, care and hope, not necessarily between humans only. We should love and care about all living organisms, from bugs to animals in the wild. People nowadays hope for a healthier life for their families and themselves; in order to achieve such a goal they sacrifice the lives of many animals for the selfish purpose of leading a healthier life. They offer up animal lives for animal testing.

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

We shouldn’t test products on animals because it’s cruel, it can affect the environment, and affects humans. Did you know that every year over a hundred million animals of all kinds are killed? We shouldn’t test on animals because it’s cruel. Animals are being shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, and addicted to drugs and much more without painkillers.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation has been practiced for centuries. Humans have always used other living beings for their benefits weather its consuming them, making unnecessary cloths out them such as fur, experimenting and using them as entertainment like in the circus. The treatments these animals experience is beyond inhumane. There are many different experiments done on these animals for human safety, these tests are for cosmetic industries, medical training, testing drug or different types of toxic chemicals and food. Animal experimentation is extremely cruel, unnecessary and unreliable.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

After reading this, people will see that these testing are extremely harmful to animals. The pain animals endure during testing is so harmful, it’s basically animal abuse. Animals are put through a lot of pain and suffering. Tiny mice are given tumors bigger than their bodies.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing is ineffective, and inhumane because it wastes thousands of

Read More
1705 Words | 7 Pages

New technologies could even detect and predict subtle components that animal testing cannot, so why waste time and the lives of animals on inaccurate results. Results that could be found elsewhere with a lot less damage done. Not only are their new technologies but animal testing has been around for years and results and information has built up so researchers and scientists should be able to apple information already gathered and apply it to new technologies. Theres no excuse for the the suffering these animals are going through and researchers need to be a lot more appreciative of these animals and treat them better by letting them live the lives they were meant to

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

Primary Knowledge Claim: Seeing that there is a big number of people accepting that it is acceptable to test on animals I think: I think it is ethically wrong to have animals being experimented for the betterment. 25 million animals are experimented on for biomedical researches, science education (dissecting heart, where animals are dead) and cosmetics (for mascaras and liquid liners), every year in the US. Rabbits are being tested on for shampoos and other products, which causes an irritation and are forced to have their eyelids helped open by clips. They can’t blink for multiple days until the test is over. 50% of the animals are killed by the Lethal dose test, which in this test you are able to find out what chemical is involved in the product.

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

While others think there is an alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. In vitro testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. Microdosing, the administering of doses too small to cause adverse reactions, can be used in human volunteers, whose blood is then analyzed. Artificial human skin is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin. Computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

As I have been saying is that animals react differently and don't function with different diseases like the ones we get. And why are we implanting them into these animals and basically killing them just for it not to work on humans. Finally, According to Cruelty Free International, “90% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests – whether on safety grounds or because they do not work.’’ Over all animal testing is a bad thing and I hope it can stop

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

Even though, humans often progress from successful animal research, the pain, the inflictions, and the deaths of animals are not worth the human asset. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More

More about Dogs Should Not Be Used For Animal Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document