Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Demarits of drugs in sports
Demarits of drugs in sports
Demarits of drugs in sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Demarits of drugs in sports
Demarits of drugs in sports
Demarits of drugs in sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “The Cask of Amontillado,” by Edgar Allen Poe, Montresor displayed the image of a connoisseur as he artfully played with Fortunato to gain revenge. First of all, Montresor used Fortunato’s intoxication to his advantage to entice him into the depths of the vaults. Montresor perceived it would be much easier to manipulate Fortunato if he had been drinking all night long, so he implemented his plan after Fortunato had several drinks. As the story recited, “‘Drink,’ I said, presenting him the wine,” Montresor kept Fortunato’s drinking persistent even as they entered the damp, eerie vaults.
By allowing professional athletes to use drugs, what message are we sending out to young sports players and those who idolize their sporting heroes? Is the goal to inform them on how to cheat, or how to use your own muscle and blood to win? Performance-Enhancing drugs used by athletes can cause many health problems and create an unfair advantage to other athletes. Many of the performance enhancers used have serious health risk and allow the use of such substances could cause peer pressure to all athletes to consider using them. Athletes dreaming to improve their performance the easy way are often the first you see to start using substances; this places them at risk of the many consequences.
The history of drugs in sport is one of the main impacting factors on its impact within society because it is through the history that many other aspects such as the economy have been impacted. The use of drugs in sport by athletes such as Lance Armstrong throughout the history of high performance sport has meant that with every new method of testing that the world anti-doping agency is coming out with, there are people coming out with ways for their athletes to undetectably dope. This has meant that because athletes have seen other athletes such as Lance Armstrong get away with doping for so many years, they believe that they too can easily get away with in, therefore creating an increase in the use of drug in sport. Between 2012 and 2013 there was a 20% increase in the positive testing to drugs by both Olympic and non-Olympic sport. This is a dramatic increase because of the fact that there was only an increase of 0.8% in the amount of drug testing preformed (14).
Another impact on others is that embarrassment that is caused for family and friends by using drug to cheat and being caught out as they may stuck up for the athlete and proving that they weren’t cheating but then the athlete was found to be positive for using drugs to enhance their performance then this would cause for embarrassment to all those whom tried to stick up for the athlete. Or for example for Lance Armstrong whom is not in the Olympics as he is a road cyclist who has a wife as well as kids. This would cause for embarrassment to not only his wife but his kids as he will always be known as a drug cheat and lying about it by making a big deal that he wasn't using drugs via media. Some relatives to athletes admit that if one of their
“Performance-enhancing drugs absolutely give athletes advantages in strength and endurance, which helps them both in the preparation for their sport as well as the actual implementation of the skills needed in many ways for the different sports.” (Argintar) Anything that can make an athlete better in an unfair way that can not be done by all athletes should not be allowed, especially something this harmful. Anything that is not worked for and earned should not be given in the form of a pill. This also lessens the actual wonder of an amazing athlete that is not doping, because due to the amount of people doping today we just tend to assume they are using something they should not be using to be that athletic or
The Olympic Games are the leading international biggest sporting event providing summer and winter sports competitions in which over thousands of athletes across the world participate in a mixed variety of competitions and sports. The Olympics are held every four years in one city or area and has over 200 nations competing within it. New Zealand started going to the Summer Olympics in 1908 and Winter Games in 1952. These Olympics where ever they are held around the world, New Zealand athletes always go and compete to represent our country. At previous Olympics Games, we have had many athletes across the world changing the play of sports with the use of drugs at the Olympics change the way of winning a sport and this has caused future implements
Drug use and doping within the Olympics affected me in negative and positive ways, varying between articles in which I researched. Many athletes have been caught and tested positive for doping which shocked me immensely; with approximately 60% doping, making it more than half the athletes out of thousands. Knowing that this many athletes had been doping at any one time at an Olympic Games made me feel very angry towards them and I felt extremely sorry for all the athletes who were honest and weren’t doping. An article by the Sydney Morning Herald left me stunned and feeling appalled at how unaware I was of how many Olympic athletes were actually doping.
I don’t think drug cheats deserve our respect, let alone another chance to compete in the Olympic games. I think that because they have gone and broken the laws of the Olympics they should not be able to come back and compete as they have already had a chance to but they took advantage of it by drug cheating and there is a chance that they may also try drug cheating again. By eliminating the drug cheats from the olympic games by banning them for good this means there is a more even playing field as there are less drug cheats therefore it will become more fair and less “normal” to use drugs for performance purposes this will decrease the effect that drug cheats have on the aspiring younger athletes as there won’t be as much advertisement of athletes using drugs to get the
In conclusion, Performance Enhancing Drugs should not be tolerated in any sport, whether professional or amatuer. These drugs are highly dangerous and even lethal to all athletes who use them. It is also unfair to athletes who choose not to use these drugs, as they are performing on their hard work and talent and not relying on an “edge” to help them reach their goals. These drugs are highly addictive, just like any other street drug or alcohol and can be fatal in many cases.
Drug use and doping throughout the years of the Olympics would have expressed the emotions of anger, sadness disappointment and frustration for the friends, family, and coaches of athletes that dope; and also of those who did not dope. I would imagine that the friends and family of athletes who have or had doped in previous Olympic Games would be nothing but disappointed and let down. Athletes have been lying to their friends and family about their success, before being tested for a positive result in drug use during the games; so once finding out I can imagine that the friends and family of the athlete would lose all respect for them and feel like an unimportant part of their life; seeing as they had not told them earlier and lied about their
She found that Olympic athletes, in general, believed that most successful athletes were using banned substances.¨ There will be no reason to play the sport anymore if people cheat.thomas ¨H. Murray, PhD, President of the Hastings Center, in the chapter¨ "Sports Enhancement" ¨published in the 2008-2009 From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center
AS91101 - 2.4 Writing Portfolio Piece Two - Cooper Title: Drugs in sports Drugs have become an integral part of any modern day sporting event. Drugs give an unfair advantage to the user and the competitors that are using enhancements are not using their own full abilities to win the Olympic medal or championship. This makes it unfair to other competitors that are not using a drug or other enhancements to compete. Athletes like Lance Armstrong and Nadzeya Ostapchuk not only give sportsmen and women a bad reputation but influence the way the public think about sports and run the risk of addiction and long-term health issues.
One of the common debates in the sports industry is whether performance drugs should be banned from athletics. The common argument is that pills should be prevented because they are dangerous and harmful to the athletes. Basing this argument of several ethical theories, the argument drugs should be forbidden in sports may or may not be justified. This paper will use several ethical theories as the bases of the pro and con arguments and conclude with a reason for supporting either a pro or a con argument.
Personal Statement 10 years ago, I had a dream that I was a neuroscientist who was working on helping children with mental disability. After that dream it has been my goal and determination to make that dream come to pass. Since I was a child I have always dreamed of being able to work with the future generation of this world. Being able to help children that are not able to help themselves is my goal in life. At the age of 12 I was babysitting and volunteering at children’s hospital and centers.
There have been many instances of doping at the Olympics. The IOC began drug tests at the 1968 Games and since then, several individual athletes and teams have been disqualified and stripped of their medals. For years, Russia has been accused of doping their athletes. “Whistleblowers have alleged that up to 99 percent of Russian athletes have taken performance-enhancing drugs, with one explaining, ‘You can’t be on the national team without using [performance-enhancing drugs]. If you don’t take them, you have no future in sport.’”