The Roman Empire was one of the most powerful, long-lasting empires this world has ever seen. Julius and Augustus Caesar both heavily contributed to Rome’s accumulation of power. Julius Caesar went on numerous conquests, winning over territory. Once he became the leader of Rome, he helped improve all aspects of Rome, including the citizens' lives. Shortly following his assassination, Augustus Caesar took over, implementing more laws and reforms, eventually transforming the republic into the Roman Empire.
Considering the content and images presented in documents E and F, we can see that Rome’s structure and stability surpassed that of Athens. According to Document F, “members of the Senate (about 300 men) served for life”. This feature ensures that Rome’s Senate remains steady and consistent over time, offering long-term stability in its leadership. Based on Document E, “All of Athens’s 40,000 citizens were eligible to attend, though travel made that difficult. Six thousand were necessary for a quorum on important issues such as ostracism.
WT Notebook Journal 2 During the period of the Early Empire, Roman expansion and change marked the end of the Roman Republic. Growth changed the ideal of the republic and new problems surfaced within Rome itself. Increase power in the Senate which led to a less democratic society and increase military power for the Greeks as well as civil wars between Rome and the provinces were some of the political changes that were prompted by Roman expansion. Socio-economical changes like high taxes due to the wars and movement towards cities, increase unemployment, and income disparity caused by the dispute between patricians and the plebeian were promoted by Roman expansion.
In this essay the reason for Rome’s fall will be identified and why they caused Rome’s downfall. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome are military problems, untrustworthy government/injustice, and natural disasters/diseases. One of the reasons Rome fell is due to the fact Rome had multiple Military problems. According to Document B “because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it” (Doc B). Also according to Document B, “soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for chest and head and were often beaten by archers” (Doc B).
Rome’s foreign policy lay with the senate and their military arm. “In all the preparations that are made for war, as well as in the whole administration in the field, they possess an almost absolute
" "I rebuilt the Capitol and the theater of Pompey, each work an enormous cost, without any inscription of my name. I rebuild aqueducts in many places that had decayed with age" (#20). " "I extended the borders of all the provinces of the Roman people which neighbored nations not subject to our rule. I restored peace to the provinces of Gaul and Spain, likewise Germany, which includes theocean from Cadiz to the mouth of the river Elbe" (#26).
He also instituted a fire brigade (Fire Department) and he also embellished Rome with a number of public buildings” (Source 4). Augustus planned to plant Rome back in its roots and return it to its old glory. All together when he planned to put Rome back at its once lost old glory and created all these things to help Rome he proved himself as excelling. He solved the problem of governing by deciding Rome to be one man ruled. He created a new amazing Roman peace and
In the third century BCE, Rome engaged in three disastrous and catastrophic wars with Carthage known as the Punic Wars; the last one ending in the complete obliteration of Carthage. Rome won each war, but the result brought more disasters than rewards. Rome was not completely ready for the task that came after; they had not prepared “for their success.” A city located inland of Italy was now challenged with the responsibility of scattered territories off the coast of Italy while, also dealing with increasing strife inside its own city. Roman farmers forced to sell their lands, the rich getting even richer, unemployment, and political corruption are just some of the many problems Rome would have to face.
One of the most important people in the Roman Empire that helped shape the events in the years 64 and 65 AD was Nero, the Emperor of Rome. Even though he is most remembered by his insanity and cruelty, Nero also helped the people and the city of Rome. He did this by passing laws that made houses and bridges safer. He volunteered to help build canals instead of hiring men to build them for him. He strengthened the economy by almost completely stopping forgery. He took an interest in the arts, especially music.
This proved his worthiness to being ruler by justifying his abilities to provide for and protect his empire. Since the Romans did not like that title of king, “he received the title Augustus by decree of the senate.” During his reign, Caesar accomplish countless things, which is why he is still talked highly about to this day. He repaired the conduits of aqueducts, dozens of temples, and completed the Julian forum and the basilica. He did these things because, like Qin, he loved and truly cared about his empire and wanted to see it flourish and restored; not broken and destroyed.
Augustus was only 17 year old when he had a positive relationship with the Senate because Augustus wanted to raise the tone of the Senate, reduce, its numbers, restore its former dignity, increase responsibility of its members and improve its efficiency. This relationship with the Senate remained for the rest of the Julio- Claudian Dynasty. Thus shows that Augustus had a positive relationship with the Senate. One of Augustus main aims was to reduce the size of the Principate he would work with, Augustus had reduced its numbers from 1000 and 800 in 23BC and then 600 in 27BC, and then 400 in 18BC by removing disreputable members who entered the Senate prior to Augustus through bribery or influence. Augustus laid down a monetary qualification of one million sesterces and added worthy men from the equestrian class.
In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.
Another accomplishment Julius did was he brought down Roman debt, and this satisfies many borrowers and lenders. Julius Caesar also improved the Roman calendar to the Julian calendar, and he granted citizenship to people living outside of Rome. Secondly, Julius Caesar helps the poor and middle class a lot, which these classes favor him. Julius
I believe that it takes more courage to engage in a nonviolent direct action, than it does to react by fighting back. Anyone can possess physical strength, but it takes heart and soul to put effort into your belief. Bayard Rustin possessed this strength and pursued what he believed in, in a positive and safe manner. An example from the text that proves this reads, “‘I believe that I have a right to sit here," I said quietly. "If I sit in the back of the bus I am depriving that child–' I pointed to a little white child of five or six–"of the knowledge that there is injustice here, which I believe it is his right to know.
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion
