ipl-logo

Equal Pay Act Case Study

973 Words4 Pages

Qiu 1
Judy Qiu
English 125
Professor Harris
November 30, 2014

Women not being paid the same as men in the same workplace violate the Equal Pay Act of 1963. According to the Equal Pay Act, by law men and women should have the same pay scale for doing similar job functions. Nina H. Compton, a business professor who teaches at New Mexico State University defines The Equal Pay Act as "equal pay for equal work". Compton explains how employers should not pay their workers, according to one's gender, but "where both perform equal work under similar working conditions on jobs requiring equal skill, effort and responsibility". In a case study about both sexes working in American universities, the National Center for Education Statistics claims "the average male faculty was $69,337, versus a $56,926 salary for average female faculty". The statistics shows male and female faculties are not receiving the same pay even though they work in the same workplace as professors. Pay gap stays consistent, but people should be paid more depending on their qualifications and performance regardless of gender. Unequal pay would create disadvantages for women. Social security is very important to women, however it is a disadvantage. The social security that women receives are lower than

Qiu 2 men because the Social Security Administrations …show more content…

Men and women working in the same occupation show that both have similar skills, but “women [still] earn 10-25% less than men”. As stated by Trond Petersen, the 1957 Equal Pay legislation claims “Equal pay without discrimination based on sex means… that pay for the same work at piece rates shall be calculated on the same basis of the same unit of measurement” which explains that salaries should be earned based on productivity for the same work for the same employer. In a case study about the piece rate work, wages and effort, Max Weber believe both sexes are equally productive

More about Equal Pay Act Case Study

Open Document