ipl-logo

Essay Comparing The Classical And Dialogical Approach

490 Words2 Pages

Comparing the Classical and Dialogical Approach
Rubi Garza
Texas A&M International University

The basis of Cheney’s (2010) Classical approach is established by decision making, where people have individual choices to make, therefore they are held accountable for every decision made. This approach has three ethical systems, virtue, consequentialism, and duty. The virtue system practices moral behavior and seeks to be conscious and persistent, in order for morality to be a part of our character (Cheney, 2010). The assumption is to learn and engage in deep comprehension beyond the surface of things and become motivated towards good intentions that could transform journalism. Consequentialism is the most common type of moral decision making in the classical approach …show more content…

This approach sees people’s obligations arise from the relations they have with other people and their community (Cheney, 2010).Within this method, there are three ethical systems that focus on communication and communal practices, being the discourse, feminist, and communitarian systems. In discourse, the main focuses is on the dialogue between people (Cheney, 2010). By having a dialogical form, people in communication or a community may learn to be aware of concerns and different opinions other than their own. This leads to common ground between groups. The feminist system focuses on experiences of the people and their culture (Cheney, 2010). The reciprocity and the care of people are seen as the essence for this system and emphasizes that the main role in making a decision should be based on nurture and empathy (Cheney, 2010). Communitarian as the last system focuses on the assumption that identities are found through social areas, such as, sociocultural values and meanings that can be constructed through dialog with one another (Cheney,

Show More
Related
1853 Words | 8 Pages

Under a consequential perspective, Commissioner Walker opines that as an official of the city he is ethically obligated to make decisions that promote good consequences for the greatest number. As he begins to deliberate on the case he starts to reflect on the two schools of thought. He first starts to ponder the meaning of consequentialism. He knows that consequentialism is the view that morality produces the right kinds of overall consequences.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

For the Aztecs, the loss of their culture and population isn’t worth the Spanish profit. However, for the Spanish, the opposite is true. The basic complication of morality is: how do we decide what is right or wrong? Many thought processes answering this question have been developed throughout time, including consequentialism. This is the idea that if the outcome is good, the action is moral.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

A discourse community is a group of people who share a common interest, ambition, and hobby; they use communication to achieve certain goals or issues that they have encountered. There are many discourse communities all over the world, and many of us are in one or more discourse communities; however, they might not even know it. In life, each person will eventually be a part of a discourse community. A discourse community has many definitions; John Swales defines discourse communities as, groups that have goals or purpose, and use communication to achieve these goals. According to “The Concept of Discourse Community,” by instructors and researcher John Swales, there are six requirements that are required to form a discourse community.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

As we know consequentialism is the focus of an action that does more intrinsically good than bad, one kind of consequentialist theory is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an action that produces consequences that are more good over bad for everyone involved. In order to produce an action that is the best one a utilitarianist would consider both long and short term effects. Two sub categories of utilitarianism include act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. act utilitarianism bases an action on the overall well being produced by an individual.

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

“Consequentialism and the agent’s point of view.” Ethics, vol. 132, No. 2 -. 4, 1 July 2022, pp. 113-122. 787–816, https://doi.org/10.1086/719517.

Read More
1985 Words | 8 Pages

Consequentialists differ from Deontologists on their insistence that when it comes to rightness or wrongness, the results of our actions are only things that matter. There are certain features of standard consequentialism: 1. While referring to the results or consequences of an action, consequentialists take into account the overall outcome which also includes the value of action itself. However, they are usually more interested in the consequences not only of people acting in a certain way but also of one 's refrainment from the action. 2.

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

When a person is going to make a moral decision based on consequentialism, he or she first look at the good and bad possible consequences of the action, then determine whether the total good consequences outweigh the total bad.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

Community Communitarianism. The assumption of communitarianism is that political community must rest on a prior cultural community and that minorities and incoming groups to the polity must adapt to this cultural community. This is precisely what radical pluralist rejects. Radical pluralism argued for group- differentiated understanding of community, which is never holistic, and nevertheless gives thought to conflicts within the community and society.

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

However, I can also think of circumstances where I would behave more like a consequentialist. The video presentation was concerning consequentialist moral reasoning and categorical moral reasoning. Consequentialist moral reasoning deals with the consequences of the actions and doesn’t place a lot of emphasis on the actions themselves.

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Consequentialist believe that morality is about producing the right overall consequences, and that the action brings about either happiness, freedom or survival of species. Utilitarianism is an example of consequentialism that maximizes utility (happiness). The difference between utilitarianism and consequentialism is that a utilitarian overlooks justice, as long as an utilitarian can maximize pleasure they would do whatever it takes. Consequentialist enjoy maximizing pleasure like a utilitarian, but they also take into account autonomy and justice. A consequentialist believes that determining good by measuring the outcome, if the good for all in the act is greater than the bad for all in the act, it is deemed morally good.

Read More
1517 Words | 7 Pages

In Aldous Huxley’s book, Brave New World, an unimaginable dystopia has been created. The World State was formed on three principles: community, identity, and stability. These three principles dictate how members of this society live and interact with one another. In modern society, there is an emphasis on the importance of motherhood, commitment, and countless other ideals that are rejected in the World State. Throughout the novel, the principle of community is shown with castes and hypnopaedic slogans, such as everybody belongs to everybody else.

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Explain how the movie deals with consequentialism and non-consequentialism, particularly in the role the “Pre-Cogs” play in the movie and the idea behind Pre-Crime. Consequentialism can be defined simply as being concerned with the consequences of an act or event. The consequences are of greater priority than the act itself. This is a means justifies the end view of things. There are two main forms of consequentialism, egoism and utilitarianism.

Read More
1340 Words | 6 Pages

Consequentialism is a theory stating morality is dependent on an action’s outcomes; the most noteworthy example of this theory is utilitarianism. Consequentialism is contested as critics find it overdemanding for application on the virtue of its extensiveness in the individual’s life and reliance on unpredictable consequences, and due to the depth of logic override necessary to maximise happiness in some situations. Rebuttals have been made, and in this essay, I will explain the principles of consequentialism and utilitarianism and argue that the refutations are unsuccessful. Consequentialists, as aforementioned, strive to create best overall consequences for the largest amount of people. Moral agents must aim to maximise happiness and minimise pain.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Consequential Ethical theory It is a part of normative ethical theories and it means that the consequence of ones behavior is an ultimate mean for anyone to judge the rightness or wrongness of that behavior. So, from the perspective of a consequentialist an ethically right act is the one that will inherit good outcome or consequence. It usually explains the saying “the end justifies the means” which means that in order to achieve a goal, take any route which leads to achieving it.

Read More
2393 Words | 10 Pages

Consequentialist theory followers. Consequentialist theory followers focus mostly on the consequences of the decision and the action. The most famous consequentialist theory is Utilitarianism. This theory follows the principle of utility which assumes that the decision is ethical if it maximizes benefits to the society and minimizes harms.

Read More

More about Essay Comparing The Classical And Dialogical Approach

Related Topics

Open Document