ipl-logo

Essay On Canadian Senate Reform

1425 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of democracy

Canadian Senate Reform

The Senate, which consists of one hundred and five appointed members, was created to represent the rights and interests of Canadians in all regions. It is known as the superior house within Canada’s bipartisan parliamentary democracy (Joyal, 2003). There is no question that Canada is in fact, a democratic country and The Senate exists, in theory, to ensure the continuation of this. As democracy is frequently defined as “power vested in the people” (Stilborn, 1992), it is not uncommon for individuals to see the country’s democratic methods as a largely efficacious. However, contrary to popular belief, democracy, if not implemented properly, can be a “slow, messy, combative and often inefficient form of government” as …show more content…

The goal was to have Senators elected by a vote consisting of multiple-member, province-wide precincts (Makarenko, 2006). It was seen as important to ensure that each province in Canada obtained a confirmable number of seats within the Senate as the Triple E Senate advocated absolute equality between provinces; each province would be given six seats, with the Territories given two seats respectively. Additionally, the Triple E Senate urged that the Senate should be given a “suspensive veto” consisting of ninety days for money bills and one hundred and twenty days for other types of legislation, signifying the House of Commons would be able to override the Senate after these durations (Makarenko, 2006). Evidently, the Triple E Senate received little support at this time, as it was not successfully in its implementation into government. What both the government and general public failed to see was that the objective of the Triple-E proposal was to reshape the relationship that existed between citizens and government and also between the provinces, in order to make it more democratic and impartial, benefitting the country as a whole (Makarenko, …show more content…

He states, “The Senate should not be a duplicate of the House of Commons, but a compliment”. Although similar to the above suggestions, Gibbins and Roach (2010) have developed four main contentions that advocate ways to improve the Senate in today’s society.

1. The senate should better represent Canada’s diverse population.
Canada is known for its multicultural comradeship and diversity but this fact is not reflected in the configuration of Parliament. If we were to take a close look at the House of Commons, we would instantly notice that most individuals are white men, supporting one of only four political parties. Statistically speaking, twenty percent of Canada’s population is of visible minority or Aboriginal status however only a mere eight percent of recent MP’s are non-white individuals. Based on this information, we can make a cultivated assumption that Canadian minorities are severely underrepresented in political life. Senate reform provides a legitimate chance for our country to address this long-established and indelible shortcoming. According to Gibbins and Roach (2010), “Electing Senators through some form of proportional representation should be a key element of Senate reform. A properly designed proportional representation

Show More
Related
1526 Words | 7 Pages

Uglow, Frances Hinton, and Maggy Hendry. 4th ed. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, 2005 3) Valerie Knowles, First Person: A Biography of Cairine Wilson Canada'as First Woman Senator. Louiseville: Dundurn Press Ltd., 1988.

Read More
1732 Words | 7 Pages

Las Vegas On October 1st, 2017, 64-year-old Stephen Paddock shot and killed fifty-eight, concert attendees. , and injured 527 more. Paddock planed an attack months prior to the shooting.

Read More
1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

The Amending Formula protects the Constitution from being unjustly altered, this is done through Mr. Trudeau’s purposeful decision to make it nearly impossible to change the constitution. The steps required to amend the Canadian constitution include the approval of the Senate, then the approval of the House of Commons and the legislatures of at least seven of the ten provinces, if these provinces represent at least 50% of the population of Canada. This is also known as the 7/50 rule. Thus, the Amending Formula has been designed to ensure it will never be unjustly altered regardless of the regime it is under, attesting to the fact that the Amending Formula effectively provides legal stability, and

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Looking at the political history of Canada, there has been quite a few times when provinces were unhappy with the divisions of powers between themselves and the federal government. In 1985 Alberta’s Select Special Committee proposed the idea of a Triple E Senate reform. They viewed parliament, especially Senate, as a way that they could bring their issues to the national forum and they could be taken care of. The provinces have been more interested in a more regionally represented parliament that would be more interested in aiding in regional issues. They believe that Senate should follow through with one of its major duties and instead of simply focusing on Ontario and Quebec due to their larger populations, should instead have representatives from each province to strengthen the federal government in its relations with its provinces and the total Canadian

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

Aucoin Essay Our new prime minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau has given a set of democratic reforms to minister LeBlanc who has been given the task to deal with the problems regarding parliament issues. Our prime minister has promised Canadians real change to the way the government governs by committing to invest in Canada’s growing economy, to strengthen the middle-class, to help the hard working class, to provide help to those whom need it most compared to those who do not need it, and to invest in the public to create jobs, economic growth and a broad-based expansion. Aucoin’s democratic reform proposal tests for good reforms that include clear objectives, no loopholes, clear enforcement mechanism, entrench the house of commons power, fixed

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Additionally, for the most part, Canada’s legislative body has several similarities and differences with the United States’ Congress. In the United States, Congress is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Similarly, Canada’s Parliament is also made up of a bicameral legislature: the House of Commons and the Senate (Courthouse Libraries BC). In general, both legislatures in both countries have the ability to amend, repeal, and make new laws. And in order to do so, both have individual committees within the branches, in which they undergo several reading and deliberation phases for approval and assurances.

Read More
344 Words | 2 Pages

However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

Read More
1844 Words | 8 Pages

The 1979 Pepin- Robarts Commission and 1980 Quebec Liberal Beige Paper argued for increased representation of regional interests in the federal levels of government though the use of appointed Senators by provincial governments. (Stilborn 1992, pg. 31) Provincially appointed Senators would have allowed the provinces to influence federal actions that impact provincial areas. The original idea for the Senate was to offer a second opinion to bills that the House of Commons passed. With having provincial appointed Senators, it would cause the Senate to move away from representing Canada on a whole to being more focused on representing Canadians on a provincial basis. Another reform proposal was the idea of having term limits, as done in the United States of America.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

All over Canada, Canadians have different views as for what should we do about the Senate .Yes, the Senate has some important qualities but what we do not need the Senate for today is one of its original purposes, to represent the interests of the provinces in the federal legislative policy process. For example, people like “Ralph Goodale, who fought hard for Saskatchewan’s interest around the Cabinet table for more than a dozen years. John Baird, the regional minister for Eastern Ontario today,”(Eugene Lang) is a current equivalent. The provincial interest is taken care of by regional ministers in a way that no senator or group of senators could hope to

Read More
131 Words | 1 Pages

However, trust in a state elected senate eroded over time. Because of legislative deadlock, instances of corruption in the election of senators, and a slow move to populism, the public eventually began to resent the method in which senators were chosen. Although the constitution stated in Article I Section 3 that senators were to be chosen by state legislatures, it was unclear about how that selection should happen. In the late 19th century, states consistently failed to elect their senators because of this grey area. This was the result of political parties dividing state legislatures to the point where they could not agree on a singular candidate and between 1885 and 1900 alone the states of West Virginia, Louisiana, Montana, Washington and

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout Canadian history many times have the citizens been against the federal government. However, none of them have been as strong as separatism. Canada’s relations with Québec was especially unstable. Signs of separatism were on the rise during the 1960s and despite of the government 's attempts to cool it down, it continued to rise. Separatism in Canada became the most influential through the Front de Libération du Québec, the Constitution Act of 1982, and the Meech Lake Accord.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

The United States House of Representatives is one of the two houses of Congress, the legislative branch of the federal government. The House of Representatives is composed of 435 voting members, who are elected every two years from their respective congressional districts. However, many experts believe that this number is too low to effectively represent the interests and needs of the American people. In this essay, I will argue that the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives should be expanded to better serve the American people. First and foremost, expanding the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives would help to ensure that every American citizen is more accurately represented.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

How come no one could ever take over the government? Well, we have the writers of the constitution to thank for this. WIthout the constitution, there would be a tyranny. The constitution was written in 1787. Its main purpose is to give our government a solid direction, and to describe the roles of the three branches in our government: The judicial, legislative, and executive branches.

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

“Representation is absolutely VITAL..." --- Kelly Sue DeConnick. It is important to be represent whether it be in politics or personal preference. being properly represented in politics is important to most because who is representing them in politics may not share the same ideals as them, many people I know whether it be at work, school, or family, feel they’re being misrepresented due to the recent election, and are afraid of being misrepresented in politics because it could change their day to day life. Many also feel that they are being properly represented and the new president will help the day to day life. unfortunately, it is difficult for everybody to be properly represented in politics, so many people have different ideas it would

Read More

More about Essay On Canadian Senate Reform

Related Topics

Open Document