One of the most widely hated aspects of the United States Constitution by the people is the Electoral College concept of electing the President. Instead of direct vote, the people suffer through a process that seems to leave some people without a voice in the electing of the President. Instead, the votes that are apportioned to each state are all given to the majority winner in the state. In essence, nullifying the votes received by the second or third party candidates. This reallocation of votes strengthens a two-party system and sincerely deters from a multi-party system of politics by removing much of the chance of a third party candidate effecting the outcome of the election without carrying the entire state. Since an amendment to …show more content…
This is done by each of the state’s two congressional districts being assigned one electoral vote, and the other two votes going to the winner of the popular vote in the state. This could effectively allow a three-to-one split of this states four electoral votes. Professor Robert Turner pointed out in his discourse that the district system, even in the 2000 election which is considered the most recent Electoral College failure, proved to be a near perfect balance of the accuracy desired in a direct election, paired with the efficiency of the winner-take-all style of the current Electoral College. Even more amazingly, when applying the district system results to all presidential elections since 1952 up until the 2000 election, they system was “…a more accurate reflection of candidates’ popular support at the national level.” Turner lastly argues that in a district system, instead of a candidate competing for one of the traditional fourteen battleground states that hold the bulk of the electoral votes, candidates would be forced to campaign in forty-two states that include battleground and even marginal bases of partisan support to ensure they pull a high Electoral College vote, thus exposing the citizens to the candidates and their platforms on a more intimate level. These reasons constitute what many feel is the most viable initiative to combat the overly powered and flawed Electoral College, winner-take-all format of presidential