ipl-logo

Essay On Should College Athletes Get Underpaid

596 Words3 Pages

The NCAA made 770 million dollars in revenue over a 3 week period during March Madness last year. How much money did the athletes that made all of that money possible receive? $0. Due to the popularity of college sports and the NCAA, companies and universities around the country have been benefiting by making millions of dollars in profit off of advertisements and sponsorships attached to different universities. Collegiate athletes in the NCAA should receive pay for their work because they bring in millions of dollars to their schools and perhaps college athletes would not abandon the NCAA to go to the NFL if they were economically compensated for. The debate of whether or not collegiate athletes should receive pay is one that is on the hot …show more content…

Some say that these athletes receive scholarships and good education which is satisfactory enough for the work they do. “Athletes who generate this substantial revenue are still unpaid for, if one considers scholarships as pay, they are underpaid in proportion to what they generate. In professional football and basketball, for example, players are paid approximately one-half of the revenues generate” (Gilleran,Katz,Vaughn.) The idea of an Athletic Scholarship was introduced in the 1950s when an institution’s revenue in athletics was based primarily on ticket sales to home games. Scholarships that these athletes receive has helped avoid unionization, workers compensation and wages for college athletes. But in the modern day world it makes sense to re-examine this subject in light of the significant revenue changes that these universities receive yearly. “The institutions reaping significant television revenue and BCS (Bowl Championship Series) revenue could now devise a process of compensation to their athletes that comports with traditional American notions of fairness in the marketplace, just as they have adjusted to comply with the gender equity provisions of Title IX, which was implemented in 1972. The process of

Show More
Related
905 Words | 4 Pages

Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Division I athletes deserve to earn compensation because the NCAA, a billion-dollar industry, and the universities these athletes are paying for can afford to give these athletes a separate payment that does not include scholarship money they may receive.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

These student athletes deserve to be compensated for the work they do. Events such as March Madness bring in $1 billion dollars, but almost none go to the athletes. In a Forbes article, “Why The Public Strongly Supports Paying College Athletes”, sports attorney Luke Fedlam writes, “We have seen over the last 20 years the explosion in the commercialization of college sports. Check out the NCAA March Madness tournament. So much money is being made on student-athletes’ abilities”(Fedlam).

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

The NCAA puts its money where its mission is, equipping student-athletes to succeed on the playing field, in the classroom, and throughout life. They aren’t trying to make it so their athletes can live from an income from their sport during college. They are trying to prepare them for the future and help them succeed. In the article “Should NCAA rules be changed to allow intercollegiate athletes to be paid a salary for participating in sports?” (Handy)

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

If the NCAA can earn millions of dollars from student athletes, shouldn’t athletes retain their fair share? NCAA Student Athletes deserve to be paid because their hard work and time is the driving force behind the profit and popularity of the NCAA. All of the ticket and merchandise sales, television revenue, promotions, and other sources of income go to the NCAA, the schools, the coaches, the event staff, and others involved – except for the athletes creating the value of the NCAA. The NCAA finished the 2014 campaign with just under $1 Billion in revenue, which is more than the NHL and NBA.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

The debate of the topic of paying student athletes, argues that these athletes currently receive scholarships, whose value in some instances, total close 200,000 over there four years. The NCAA have signed a 6,200,000,000 11-year deal giving CBS the rights to televise its men basketball championship that’s 545,000,000 a year up from 216,000,000 annually (Meshefejian 2). And college athletes don’t get any money from it. This is why college players should be

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

In 2015, NCAA division 1 programs generated $9.15 billion of revenue with athletics according to Business Insider, with the athletes not benefiting from that like they should be. I am from Plymouth MN at Wayzata high school and an avid college sports fan. I believe that the collegiate athletes, who are the ones generating revenue for the huge benefits of others, is wrong. The payout should be a percentage of revenue generated because certain sports generate more than others. College athletes should be paid like everyone else in the industry and reap the rewards that the media and NCAA employees are getting over the athletes.

Read More
2007 Words | 9 Pages

According to USA Today College’s article on this issue, they stated, “First, who pays the athletes? The school, the conference, or the NCAA itself? Second, since most college athletics programs don’t generate money, who deserves to be paid? Each individual athlete, or just the ones who bring in the dough? What about the schools who don’t have big money-making programs?

Read More
1295 Words | 6 Pages

Last year, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) made over one billion dollars in revenue. How much of that went to the athletes? None. The athletes (who by the way are the NCAA’s main source of income) get nothing. That's not the case for every athlete, though, as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) accused the University of Arizona of paying star basketball player Deandre Ayton one hundred thousand dollars to play basketball at their university.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

“United States Colleges awarded over $3 billion in athletic scholarships to varsity athletics in 2014.” That means that $3 billion goes to scholarships that are needed to make their sports teams look better for the school to get more enrollments. Also, if they would get paid where would this money come from for everyone to get paid? Then if they do get the money they will be many more problems with college students, doing dumb things with the money. So overall college athletes shouldn’t be paid.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

Do you ever wonder if its fair that college athletes bring in billions of dollars to their schools and to the NCAA, but they don't receive any money at all? The topic of whether to pay college athletes or not has been a trending topic for quite some time. The major question is, should these athletes be receiving more than just a scholarship? Imagine being a NCAA athlete and seeing a jersey with your name and number is selling in the stores for over $100, and it might even be bringing in more revenue than most professional sports jerseys, and not receiving any sort of compensation. This is a problem that that a lot of college athletes in today's world are facing.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

Read More

More about Essay On Should College Athletes Get Underpaid

Related Topics

Open Document