ipl-logo

Essay On Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

755 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: On financial compensation for college athletes

The Washington State Cougars “have lost 12 players to the [transfer] portal since the end of their regular season” because they’re unable to out-pay the other schools (Clark 2). When college athletes receive money for advertisements and endorsements because of their name, money outmatches some coaches that worked hard to recruit kids. College athletes should not be paid for their name, image, and likeness.
Every athlete's goal when going to play sports in college: make it to the pros. Why make college so similar to professional? In college football, “[m]ore than 1,500 players were in the transfer portal as of Tuesday” (Johnson 2). Entering the transfer portal can often be compared to free agency in the NFL or the NBA. Athletes leave their college and consider their options on where to further their education and athletic career. This is often when players can be offered deals and money to come play at a certain school. Some people believe it’s a “[f]lawed …show more content…

Players are attracted by great coaches, which means the coaches are rewarded for being skilled, in the form of talented players. Traditionally, “coaches who are socially effective will be able to identify and leverage [recruits]” (Magnusen and Todd 14). When schools “[dangle] NIL packages in front of players”, the skilled and hardworking coaches lose the recruiting battle to money (Clark 2). NIL (name, image, and likeness), an acronym that represents money paid to current and incoming college athletes. Offering athletes money should not downgrade the great coaches when recruiting. If recruiting becomes a money war, the NCAA would split. If the school has loads of money, they will acquire multiple talented recruits. If they don’t have enough to afford athletes, they will be lucky to stay in Division 1. Great coaches should be able to leverage recruits because of their skill, not

Show More
Related
730 Words | 3 Pages

These schools struggle to compete with larger programs offering lucrative deals to top recruiters. Even former players, like Tim Tebow, worry that money-driven recruiting may detract from the true spirit of college football. To address these issues, the NCAA could require NIL deals to come directly from brands, rather than through schools, ensuring athletes still benefit financially without compromising the integrity of the recruiting process. This approach would align more closely with professional sports and better prepare student-athletes for their future careers. “It explains how smaller schools might struggle to compete with big ones for top

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

Hala Warda Kristin McGregor English 90R 22 October 2015 Summary and Response#3: “College Athletes Should Be Paid” Ann Kaufmann’s article “College Athletes Should Be Paid” explains that because college football and men’s basketball programs are so profitable, the athletes who play them should be paid. One reason they should be paid is because they spend more time practicing than they study. For example, “college football and basketball players often spend upwards of 50 hours a week during the season at their sport” (452). Another reason is NCAA doesn’t allow players to accept any gifts money from anyone. For instance, the article states that “not surprising, college players are sometimes tempted to take money under the table” (452).

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

It doesn’t matter if the player is not as good as expected or going to be projected the number one athlete in the class. All that matters is each and every player when they go out to the field or court are always risking their lives on each play. When the athlete is already getting paid in college it can teach the players responsibility. They can set up fines for disobeying the rules set up by the coaches, and they can decide on a suspension for the player, just like in the NFL and all other professional athletes. If the player is good why not give them a little taste of what they will receive in the big leagues.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

The NCAA has made a profit on the careers of young college athletes across all sports for decades, with players being forbidden from earning money based on their name image and likeness up until 2 years ago. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name image and likeness and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches, players’ commitment to the sport, as well as the players’ background. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name, image, and likeness, and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches. New Colorado football head coach Deion Sanders recently said during an interview when asked about scouting defensive lineman “Defensive linemen, it’s totally opposite — single mama, trying to get it, he’s on free lunch…. I’m talking about just trying to make it.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

However, after an NCAA board meeting, the decision was made that players will be allowed to make money off the use of their NILs. NIL stands for the player’s Name, Image, and Likeness. This is meaning that the players will get paid as the NCAA uses them to promote things such as games and merchandise. This decision can be traced back to California and many other states following suit, allowing college athletes to sign agents and get endorsement deals, thus forcing the NCAA into this position and the decision. This audio broadcast showed that the NCAA was starting to see the issues of their choices to not pay their student-athletes, but that they are not ready to recognize them as

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

NIL contracts are a great way for athletes to get noticed by professional leagues like the NBA. There are many instances of athletes getting recognized from their sponsorships. When Overtime Elite presented the opportunity to a group of student-athletes, they “jumped at the rare opportunity” in the hope that it will help with “making an even bigger leap to the NBA” (Huddleston 1). This means that student-athletes have an opportunity to make a bigger name for themselves and have a better chance at competing in professional sports. Players with NIL deals can get even more recognition through social media pages run by their sponsors.

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

This debate has sparked controversy within the two leagues for a number of years because many high school prospects think that college is a waste of time and money. In reality, college provides athletes with more opportunities than they would have had otherwise. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) manages intercollegiate

Read More
1579 Words | 7 Pages

In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

It’s not uncommon for high school athletes to accept some type of an incentive to attend a college who is interested in recruiting him; however this is breaking the NCAA rules. Many college athletes are just looking for a source of income that they can survive off of. Most families cannot support their kid in college and pay their own bills too. Some say that if you pay one college athlete then you have to pay them all, including swimmers, runners or cheerleaders. With colleges making multi millions off of sport programs then there should be some type of way to divide that extra revenue in a fair way.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

Another reason is that it does not help with the balance of different sports, if a college only focuses on the football team, the baseball team that is not as good will not have enough money to pay for some things, recruit some players and the sport and fame of the college will eventually die, all of these reasons make sense and I agree with but college athletes should be paid just not as

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting

Read More
1231 Words | 5 Pages

In recent years, larger universities with bigger budgets have been able to recruit the best athletes by offering better facilities, resources, and coaching staff. This has created an imbalance in college sports, with smaller schools struggling to compete with larger ones. By paying college athletes, smaller schools would have the opportunity to attract top talent and compete on a more level playing field. College athletes are often left without any representation when it comes to the rules and regulations that govern their sport. The NCAA has been criticized for being opaque and inconsistent in its decision-making, leaving college athletes without any say in the rules that govern their athletic pursuits.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

College athletes provoke millions of dollars of earnings for the NCAA (Block). Attending college is a big change for the students. Learning to be independent and living off of your own wage is something that doesn’t come and go easily. Plus, having no time to get a job to earn anything must be hard. The hard topic to grasp is why the college athletes don’t receive some sort of payment for their hard work and dedication to the coaches, their fans, and their teammates.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

Coaches believe that they’re protecting their players from themselves and their career prospects. They are also protecting them from harming their school reputation which also effects their revenue from sporting events. This transitions to the financial status of the NCAA and how they distribute that money across colleges. As stated before from USA Today, “the NCAA hauled in $989 million in its 2014 fiscal year. Since the association had $908.6 million in expenses, it ended up with a nearly $80.5 million surplus for the year”.

Read More

More about Essay On Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document