ipl-logo

Ethical Implications In The Film Empire Strikes Back

552 Words3 Pages

Ethical Implications Humans are social creatures. An abundance of our intelligence endeavors originates to collaborative our aptitude by means to employ our environment. Absolute guidelines with prominence of duty are for the significances in harsh or moral cases towards the viewpoints of Deontologists. The ethical rights to property and life arise the rules for theories of Utilitarianism in respects to decline the prevalence of happiness and security for all individuals. (Baase, 2012). an illustration built by a collaborative motion animation image proceeding orthodox techniques within Natural Rights ethics. (Gonzalez & Kasper, 1997). Ethical implications because deontology and utilitarian. Whereas with natural rights, ethical implications are given with that of deontology. Utilitarian …show more content…

Luke is antagonized with the information of his father for being the enemy. With the power of Vader became the corruption of his harmful wrong undertaking towards his son, Luke. (Starr, 2011). Vader is documented of the prevalent assassination with movements to reduce each individual’s happiness and security deriving acts of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism acts upon numerous issues with circumstances to have good consequences. Deontology Absolute rules and duty shadowed harsh or good penalties highlighted in specific Deontologists occasions. One shall not bring fiction to their life. To presume one’s wishes to treat individuals would be by means to increase individual’s happiness. These goals are to some extent vague and open to many interpretations in specific circumstances. One may attempt to outline a sphere of freedom where individuals act spontaneously in accordance to their own judgment, in respects to essential set rights of individuals, count on the possessions, freedom, and natural life rights. (Baase, 2012). Natural

Show More
Related
1005 Words | 5 Pages

What do you base your morals off of? That source may be the Quran, a philosopher, your mother, or the law. Most sources share the same belief in helping one another. As Elie Wiesel said, all humans must work together to take the responsibility to protect one another when acts of genocide occur. Protection is providing people with food, water, clothing, shelter, jobs, and education.

Read More
2028 Words | 9 Pages

From a deontologist prospective an individual will focus his attention on the moral principles as duties. Individuals have moral duties to do things that are right to do and moral duties not to do things that are wrong to do and to a deontologist whether something is right or wrong doesn’t depend on consequences but rather whether an action is right or wrong in itself. For example if someone is a parent they have a moral duty to provide for their child. Not paying an individual who on most accounts are sacrificing their health and a majority of their time is wrong in itself and using them as a means to generate large sums of money for your school is unfair, which leads to the issue of fairness. Fairness is acknowledged as fulfilling an individual’s agreed upon role in a just system.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Despite increased debate, employers, who are a key stakeholder and drug coverage provider through employee benefit plans, have been largely absent from national debate. Given the rising costs of prescription drugs, employers are increasingly concerned about the future of private coverage. That said, employers continue to fund benefits, as they believe they offer a competitive advantage in recruitment, maintain wellness and support a productive workforce, and assist in preventing long-term disability. As costs have increased, employers’ views are converging with those of government, including, a shift in focus to outcomes and creation of mechanisms to measure impact of spending for sustainability.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

In contrast to utilitarianism and other teleological approaches to moral reasoning, the deontological approach does not focus on the end result or the consequences of one’s actions. Instead, deontologists would argue that behaviors are morally just or unjust solely based on the behavior itself, separate from the chain reaction it initiates. Deontologists, as shown through the work of Kant, believe that morality and rationality are one in the same. There are three components that make up a moral action, according to Kant’s Categorical Imperative: first, the action must be universally moral, second, the action must treat other rational beings as ends themselves, rather than as means, and third, the action must be allowable for rational beings.

Read More
1202 Words | 5 Pages

Deontology which is derived from the Greek words Deon (meaning obligation/duty) and logia (science/study) combined to be also known as duty or rule-based ethics or the study of duties or obligations. It is a branch of ethical theories that deals with ethics of conduct, which theories are based on the sort of actions people must perform. It is based on non-consequentialism where the ends do not justify the means and thus deontology is an approach to ethics in which a sense of duty or principle prescribes the ethical decision (Preston, 2007). Deontology affirms duties must be obeyed regardless of the consequences. The theory of Deontology has its flaws as well and this essay will present three criticisms of deontology namely that deontology relies on moral absolutes, allows acts that make the world a worse place, two permissible duties that are right can conflict with each other and will demonstrate these flaws with relevant case studies and dilemmas.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

Defending Deontology What matters most is the result. The greatest good, for the greatest number, that is what is best would best be defended by using deontology. According to Williams and Bruce (2012), deontology looks at ethics by considering what the person’s duty is in a situation. In the eyes of a deontologist, a person is acting morally if they do the right thing no matter the consequences.

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

The concept of ethics entails systemizing, justifying, and recommending right and wrong conduct. It involves in practical reasoning: good, right, duty, obligation, virtue, freedom, rationality, and choice. Humanity has questioned this concept of ethics and ‘good’ for as long as it has survived, as it deals with real-life issues such as “what is morally right and wrong?” and “how do people ought to act?”

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

Autonomy is a person ability to lead a self-directing life. Unlike egoism and utilitarianism, Kant’s deontology looks into how the information was gather to determine if its ethical to use. Because of the focus on how the information was gather Kant ’s deontology would consider the using of the information as unethical.

Read More
1380 Words | 6 Pages

However, even though these are two opposing philosophies, with very different ideas governing their conclusions, we should look to learn from both and apply the knowledge we identify with, thus creating our own philosophies. In this essay I wish to do exactly that; to compare and contrast these two ideologies in order to better understand them and help others do the same. First we must understand what is Deontology. The word deontology when broken down to its roots literally means, the study of the nature of duty and obligation.

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

When discussing whether consequentialism and deontology are tenable, I have reason to believe that they can both be justified and implemented in certain situations in order to achieve the best outcome: whether this be happiness, utility, or moral judgment. For a consequentialist, ‘happiness is conceived of as the ultimate good’ (Hospers, 1997) however the language of morality is perceived as deontological. Regardless of the situation there is always an ethical axiom which is ‘killing innocent people is wrong’ (Markham, 2007). With both of these views exercised every day, we are faced with many possibilities, leading to problems and opportunities. Nevertheless, if we didn’t have both views, the world would be a very different place as we know it to be now and people would not be faced with the same opportunities.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

In this essay, I compared Utilitarianism and Deontology, and argued that Deontology is a better ethics system than Utilitarianism because, while Utilitarianism focuses solely on results, Deontology considers humans as more than just a means to an end and provides for a system of generally accepted

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

The theory of deontology states we are morally obligated to act in accordance with obvious set of principles and rules regardless of results. Deontological ethics focuses on duties, and rights. The term deontological was coined by the utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who described it as “knowledge of what is right or proper” Bentham thought that deontology points in the direction of principle of utility. But contemporary philosophers use the term deontological to indicate a contrast with the utilitarian focus on the consequences of action. Instead of focusing on consequences, deontological ethics focus on duties and obligation: things we ought to do regardless of the consequences.

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Rational humans should be treated as an end in themselves, thus respecting our own inherent worth and autonomy to make our own decisions. This part of Kant’s ideology may limit what we could do, even in the service of promoting an overall positive, by upholding the principle of not using people with high regard, thus serving as a moral constraint. Deontology remains as the stronger ethical framework as it explicitly lists out how one should act morally through absolute, universal laws, and also by promoting not using others as a mere means, but rather as an end in itself. On the other hand, Utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, stems from the idea that every morally correct action will produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people.

Read More

More about Ethical Implications In The Film Empire Strikes Back

Related Topics

Open Document