ipl-logo

Ethical Issues In The Courts Essay

1265 Words6 Pages

United States Courts Description
In this video, I aim to highlight ethical issues that the United States Courts face in relation to circuit judges, district judges, Court of International Trade judges, Court of Federal Claims judges, bankruptcy judges, and magistrate judges. How have these issues been addressed? And do the courts have a code of ethics that must be followed? In addition, how are these judges held accountable when involved in misconduct?

The creation of the United States federal and public courts can be traced back to the formation of the United States Constitution in 1787. The Constitution established the federal judiciary as one of the three branches of the federal government, alongside the legislative and executive branches. …show more content…

In 1789, Congress passed the Judiciary Act, which created the structure of the federal court system. This act established the Supreme Court with one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices, as well as several lower federal courts, including district courts and circuit courts.

Over the years, the federal court system expanded and evolved to meet the changing needs of the country. The number of federal judicial districts increased, and additional circuit courts were established. Congress also created specialized courts, such as the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which handles patent cases, and the Court of Federal Claims, which handles monetary claims against the United States government.

In addition to the federal courts, each state has its own system of public courts, which handle matters of state law. These courts vary in structure and jurisdiction but generally include trial courts, appellate courts, and a state supreme court. The specific details of state court systems can vary from state to state.

Overall, the creation and development of the United States federal and public courts have been ongoing since the country's founding, with the aim of providing a fair and impartial system of justice to resolve legal disputes at both the federal and state …show more content…

The Code of Conduct provides guidance for judges on issues of judicial integrity and independence, judicial diligence and impartiality, permissible extra-judicial activities, and the avoidance of impropriety or even its appearance. Judges may not hear cases in which they have either personal knowledge of the disputed facts, a personal bias concerning a party to the case, earlier involvement in the case as a lawyer, or a financial interest in any party or subject matter of the

Show More
Related

Christopher Dupuy Case Study

174 Words | 1 Pages

Numerous allegations of misconduct have been against Judge

Read More

Gibbons Vs Ogden Case Analysis

729 Words | 3 Pages

The United States of America between the time period of 1800-1835 were creating the first modern democracy. They had a separation of powers by creating a Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary Branch. The Legislative branch being the the Senate and House of Representatives, the Executive branch being the President and his advisors, and the Judiciary branch being the Supreme court. The Supreme Court informed and validated all the laws. In the end, the Supreme Court in many of their cases like Gibbons v. Ogden, McCulloch v. Maryland, Marbury v. Madison, and Cohens v Virginia made decisions that sought to assert federal power over state laws and the primacy of the judiciary in determining the meaning of the constitution.

Read More

How Did Oliver Ellsworth Influence The Development Of The Judicial System

2211 Words | 9 Pages

Shaping The Courts of America: The Judiciary Act of 1789 On the 17th of September in 1787, the delegates of the thirteen American colonies gathered at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and signed the document that is known as the Constitution of the United States of America. On the 21st of June in 1788, the Constitution had been ratified by eleven of the thirteen colonies, and other laws and acts were being discussed as well by the representatives. While the Constitution had done a phenomenal job at creating and outlining the legislative system in Article 1 and the executive system in Article 2, it was very vague when describing the judiciary system and its powers in Article 3. As a result, the Senate deemed it necessary to appoint a committee responsible for making judicial outline.

Read More

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

How Did John Marshall Have The Power Of The Supreme Court

1165 Words | 5 Pages

When the Constitution was written and the United States Government formed it consisted of three branches, the Executive, the bicameral Legislative, and the Judicial branch. When the United States Supreme Court was revealed in February 1790 it was little more than an appeals court. It had little power, and met but twice per year. The judicial branch was the weakest of the three branches. It consisted of six justices, with one being the Chief Justice.

Read More

How Did John Marshall Influence The Supreme Court

1163 Words | 5 Pages

At its inception, the Supreme Court was a vague idea created by tired delegates at the Constitutional Convention. Today, the judiciary is arguably the strongest branch in government. The person responsible for the inception of such a strong judicial branch is John Marshall. With his decisions in the Supreme Court, John Marshall used his Constitutional interpretation to grant powerful jurisdiction over the federal government, and to ensure a republic of the people rather than being in complete control of rich white men for the entirety of America. These decisions led Marshall to shape the Supreme Court by his granting of power to match the other branches of government to the modern age.

Read More

Comparison Of Canada, The United States, And Mexico Court System

878 Words | 4 Pages

Federal district courts are where most civil and criminal cases are tried. In addition to the district courts, some courts have been created to deal with specific issues. The Federal Bankruptcy court handles all bankruptcy hearings. The US Court of International trade which handles customs and trade issues. The US Court of Federal Claims which evaluates claims of monetary damages against the United States government.

Read More

Essay On Marbury Vs Madison Case

566 Words | 3 Pages

This led to the Supreme Court having the power of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is when the Supreme Court reviews a law passed by the legislative branch to see if it is constitutional or not. The Supreme Court received this power because of the Marbury v. Madison case. Since the Supreme Court has the final say on what the Constitution means, they get to decide if a law follows the

Read More

Under What Circumstances Might A Federal Court Hear A Case

1432 Words | 6 Pages

The conditions in which the Supreme Court hears a case is on an appeal basis. What is the structure of a typical state court system?

Read More

Judicial Act By George Washington Outline

1827 Words | 8 Pages

George Washington Outline (April 30, 1789 – March 4, 1797) 1) Judiciary Act - (1789) This act created the basis for the modern day judicial system. The Judiciary act provided America with its own courts, justices and attorney generals. Another very important court this act created was the Supreme Court. It is still very critical to the government today.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

462 Words | 2 Pages

When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

Read More

Supreme Court Vs French Constitutional Council

1041 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court makes up the judicial power of the United States and was brought into place with the Judiciary Act of 1789. The Supreme Court bounced around with different numbers of members that made up the Supreme Court until

Read More

Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

478 Words | 2 Pages

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at the time was Chief Justice John Marshall, and he declared that this whole process of delivering commissions for judges, the Judiciary Act, was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court declared this act illegal, because it gave the Supreme Court a power that they were forbidden to have. This is when the first law was declared unconstitutional and judicial review came into

Read More

Three Levels Of The Federal Courts Essay

492 Words | 2 Pages

The three levels within the federal courts are: the U.S. Magistrate Courts, the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The magistrate courts are the lowest level and as such are limited to trying misdemeanors, setting bail amounts and assisting the district courts. The U.S. District Courts are the federal branch of original jurisdiction courts. These are responsible for criminal trials and giving guilty or not guilty verdicts. The U.S. Courts of Appeals are responsible for all the appeals from U.S. district courts.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

More about Ethical Issues In The Courts Essay

Related Topics

Open Document