ipl-logo

Ethics Argument Essay

1086 Words5 Pages

The central claim of the given quote discusses questions of Ethics by giving the following proposition- the only morally correct choice that an individual has is that of making sacrifices of self-interest for the larger interest of the community i.e. a group of humans other than oneself. Only if the individual puts the interests of others above his own will he be considered morally correct. Now, we must state the unsaid premises that may have brought the author to these conclusions and analyze them individually-

P1- There is a definitive interpretation of what (actions) is good for different individuals and what is bad for them.
P2- The good of a group of individuals (community) is defined as that course of actions which maximises the sum …show more content…

Even if this holds true, another problem arises -time.
For instance, say you wish to go for a jog at 4 in the morning in the winter chill. At that point of time, if asked about the desirability of the prospect of jogging the answer would be clearly negative. However, what if I were to tell you that you have diabetes and the jog is vital for your long term health. What would your answer be then? Clearly affirmative.

MY VIEW- This approach is what I call the “method of scaling” which means including “the scale of time” to determine the moral nature of actions. What may seem wrong (due to being undesirable) at one moment may seem right (desirable) at another. However, we must assume that people are fully capable of using their cognitive functions such as using intuitive reasoning to determine the future results of current …show more content…

Q1. But what of the situation when two individual goods are in conflict? What would be the ethical principles applied in such a scenario?
A1. This question can be answered effectively by considering our central claim: ensuring the maximization of the sum of all good (assuming that two goods may have different degrees and that a similar good will be equal in magnitude for all people).
Example-
Let’s say there is a situation in which two students are competing for a spot on the Indian “team for the Philosophy Olympiad. Let us assume that there is a significant difference in their abilities. Now the student who is the weaker one tries to maximize his individual good by “cheating” on the exam. This student then qualifies and does not win anything at the International Olympiad. Upon being questioned about the morality of his actions, he says that they are completely justified since they were done to maximize individual good and consequently collective

Show More
Related
1381 Words | 6 Pages

This quote gives a very broad explanation of doing the opposite of the “greater good”; it says if everyone is doing it than it must be correct, even if it is unethical or immoral. The "everyone else is doing it" defense seemed to catch on in the medical field during that time, even if the concept of a greater good didn’t exist in their experiments. For example, if all of the scientists are injecting cancerous cells into people without the patient's knowledge, is that the greater good? In my opinion, no it is not, because even if one scientist does the “moral option,” in this equation, even if he gets rejected by other scientists for it, he did it for the “greater good” of humanity. Skloot also says, “‘You know other countries be buying her for twenty-five dollars, sometimes fifty?

Read More
1406 Words | 6 Pages

I believe this because a good amount of positives can result in a society where equal opportunity exists. An individual can achieve greatness. One can be in poverty and become wealthy through hard work, determination, faith, and knowledge. A movie "The Pursuit of Happyness" with actor Will Smith supports my argument. In The Pursuit of Happyness "a man named Christopher Gardner (Will Smith) invested all he had in a bone scanning device.

Read More
61 Words | 1 Pages

The Bethel School District had suspended the respondent, Matthew N. Fraser for the span of three school days as well as the school decided to revoke his name from a roster of potential speaking at special ceremonies such as graduation. The respondent’s parent reciprocated action by bringing their child’s infraction of his first Amendment right. This includes his freedom of speech.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Imagine you have difficulty waking up, trying to fight the constant sensation of drowsiness with the little life you have left. When you wake, you struggle through the haze of confusion to finally realize that you are in the same monochromatic, secluded room you’ve been in for the past two months or possibly two years. No family in sight. No pets. No fireplace awaiting you.

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

He describes the objection as, “all men desire the apparent good, but have no control over the appearance, but the end appears to each man in a form answering to his character” (1114b).   This view argues that all people pursue that which seems good, but some people cannot see the true good, which is out of their control.   The immediate implication of this objection, if it is indeed true, suggests that “no one is responsible for his own evildoing” (1114b).

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

People will sacrifice their own for others. They have the ability to change their mind from the worst, to the best. Deep down, everyone cares for something. People will sacrifice their own for others. Everyone makes a sacrifice, whether it be today or a century ago.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Organ donation is currently the only successful way of saving the lives of patients with organ failure and other diseases that require a new organ altogether. According to the U.S Department of Health and Human Services there is currently 122,566 patients both actively and passively on the transplant list. This number will continue to increase, in fact, every ten minutes another person is added to the list. Unfortunately, twenty-two of these people die while waiting for an organ on a daily basis. Each day, about eighty Americans receive a lifesaving organ transplant.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

Brave new world - Essay I look at this from a utilitarian perspective were the moral thing is to do the most good for the most amount of people. The individual, while important in any sense, is only relevant in terms of the community as a whole. It is very similar to the question of individual versus collective happiness. The happiness of the most amount of people is better than letting the individual decide for oneself.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The act Donating Organs, either prior to death or after death, is considered by many to be one of the most generous, selfless and worthwhile decisions that one could make. The decision to donate an organ could mean the difference of life or death for a recipient waiting for a donor. Organ donations offer patients new chances at living more productive, healthy and normal lives and offers them back to families, friends and neighborhoods. Despite the increasing number of donor designations in the past few years, a shortage still exists in donors.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

In the book it stated this, “According to Utilitarianism, our duty is to do whatever will increase the amount of

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The relationship between critical thinking and ethics Critical thinking is a way of thinking it is the process of analyzing, applying, and evaluating information with problem solving abilities. Critical thinking greatly improves a person’s thinking. This is the process that will determine whether the outcome of a problem is right or wrong. The critical thinking process is the mindset to make effective decisions based upon verified and truthful information. The steps to critical thinking are remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating.

Read More
1749 Words | 7 Pages

Imagine having to endure so much pain and suffering for a majority of your life that you would just want it all to end. Well, there is a way one can stop their own pain and suffering and it is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The act may only be done solely to those diagnosed with terminal illnesses such as cancer, aids, and heart disease. Many people agree with the idea of euthanasia as it can help those who are suffering be stripped of all the pain they are enduring.

Read More
1406 Words | 6 Pages

Being moral in a growing and continually changing world is no easy task, especially when there is no specific rules or guidelines to follow. If one were to ask specifically what is morality, Appiah would say that living a moral life is living an “eudaimonia,”(Aristotle) or the idea of highest good, normally translated into “happiness,” or “flourishing” (402). Living a life to the highest good is a very vague answer, considering everyone’s definition of good is different, and everyone has a different view of happiness. These opinions are so diverse because morality is not just one idea, but a mix of ideas that make up each person’s moral values. In these difference in morals, there is bound for someone getting hurt in some way, either physically, emotionally, or even spiritually.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by eliminating a fetus or embryo from the womb before it can survive on its own. There is much debate over the moral, ethical, and legal issues of abortion. There are two sides on the issue of abortion that will be discussed. The first one is pro-life. These individuals are anti-abortion, which means they agree that an embryo or fetus is a human with a right to life.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

He says that as long as you are aware of the truth and you know what the good is, it automatically means you will do the good. We all have the capacity to see the truth and the “eidos” of the good but it needs to be developed. Once it is developed that means it is logical that you will automatically do what

Read More

More about Ethics Argument Essay

Related Topics

Open Document