Both ethic statements are similar due to the way in which they address commitment to the mission of their organization, the importance of integrity, and professional proficiency. Both organizations convey an understanding of the significance of the public’s trust. I think the ethics statement of the Natural Museum of History is less effective due to its references to external documentation. The ethics statement of HACP incorporates more information on the respect of employees and addresses implemented methods to ensure ethical behavior. These methods include conflict of interest and neopotism policies. The specific terms incorporated within the HACP ethic statement gives a direct implication of what to expect from the organization. It is easier