Happiness is a state of mind, and one doesn’t need physical material to be happy, which a majority of people view to be the primary source of happiness. Simply put, a person has the power to control whether they are happy or not. The author utilizes pathos, ethos, and logos to highlight the main ideas, demonstrating his mastery of the material. His usury of pathos, ethos, and logos illustrate to the readers that happiness is primarily a state of mind which isn’t automatically influenced by material things. Ethos is the ethical appeal an author makes to emphasize his authority as a knowledgeable and experienced veteran who corroborates any particular subject matter. The author, Howard Cutler, is an American physiologist and writer whose career primarily focuses on bridging the divide between Western Phycology and Buddhist practices. The author makes an ethical claim that he is adept when it comes to the psychology of happiness and mental well-being. In addition, the author depends on the critical insight provided to him by the Dali Lama, who is a revered figure in Buddhism. Cutler quotes the Dali Lama to make sure that the reader may understand a precise perspective abetted by a person who is considered to be reliable in matters concerning happiness, mental well-being, and pleasure. For example, he says, “although it is possible to achieve happiness, …show more content…
The objective was to ensure that the reader was able to understand the points the author was making. He accomplishes this by incorporating numerous studies into his work by showing that a change can result in an increased output of happiness. For example, in a study in Buffalo, New York where the participants were in two studies were asked, “I’m glad I’m not a…” and “I wish I were…” (pg.24). Unsurprisingly, the former made the participants happier while the latter made them unhappy. The author employed previous studies to make a logical appeal to the