ipl-logo

Evaluate The Roles And Functions Of The Eu

952 Words4 Pages

Evaluate the roles and functions of each institution of the European.

The European Union (EU) currently is made up of 28 member states that joined to benefit from the EU’s main aims. The EU’s main aims are free movement of goods, person, services and capital. The EU has institutions to help ensure theses aims and this essay will evaluate the roles and function of each institution of the European Union.

The European Parliament (EP) is based in Strasbourg (some sessions are held in Brussels) and is made up of 754 members who exercise democratic supervision over the commission but unlike conventional legislatures does not introduce new laws or increase revenues, that task is fulfilled by the Council of Ministers. The EP also has equal power …show more content…

The Court of justice ensures that national and European laws and agreements being considered by the EU do not conflict with the terms or spirits of the treaties and the EU law is equally, fairly and constantly being applied in all the member states. They are able to do this by interpreting and giving their opinion about EU law to national courts and they are also able to make judgements in disputes relating to EU institutions, member states, individuals and corporations therefore giving the European Union authority in ensuring its decisions and policies agree with the EU treaties and law which is why the court does not effect family and criminal law. This allows the member states to be more integrated (mainly economically) while keeping control over many state laws and issues. Another rational part of the Court of Justice is the independence of each judge. There is a Judge from each member state and one more and all judges have to avoid promoting national interest of their home state. The courts work is categorised in two main ways, preliminary hearings and direct actions. Preliminary rulings is what the court mainly works on and deals with aiding national court cases with interpretation or validity of a certain law and can also have a preliminary ruling (most on behalf of the national court) which are binding on the court. Direct actions are when an individual, company, member state brings proceedings directly against the European Union. The court may allow for integration and clarity of EU law but cannot enforce its judgements (national courts and government will have toe enforce judgements) and so lacks power and can only impose fines, which is weak as there is no certain way for the Court to collect the

Show More
Related
107 Words | 1 Pages

In the mid-eighteenth century, many European powers wanted to expand their influence to other parts of Europe and to the rest of the world and also to gain new territories. To accomplish this, they had to overcome many issues. They had to make alliances with the natives of the new land, cooperate in trade with other powers, overcome diplomatic negotiation, and lastly make peace agreements. The natives of the new land would play a key role in establishing European powers.

Read More
2120 Words | 9 Pages

There are also no juries or witnesses and it involves only lawyers from both sides that argue the law and answer any questions the judges may have. There are seven judges at this level or one Chief Justice and six judges on the panel. The Chief Justice is elected by the court?s sitting judges and is elected a two-year term. Cases can be appealed to the Supreme Court that were heard in the Circuit Courts or the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court can override those courts decisions. The Supreme Court?s role is to guarantee a firm and reasonable judicial system and is the final arbitrator in disagreements that involve the state?s constitution and laws.

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

Did the EU’s goal of shared peace between lots of different cultures and people work out? The European Union, also known as the EU is a supranational organization that consists of 28 different countries. The EU was made to bring together countries that were torn apart by the war and to create peace between those countries. The EU works toward shared goals and issues yet remain separate countries all the same. The benefits of being a member in the European Union does not outweigh the costs due to loss of sovereignty, social unrest and peace, economic issues, and cultural identity with the diversity of languages and cultures.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

The judicial system is very important in the administration of justice for any society. Functions of the system are clearly stipulated and defended by the constitution of any nation. For a judge to pass a ruling on a suspect, the trial has to go through several stages before a final ruling is arrived at. Thus, one would believe the judgments made are considered fair making the judicial system a defender of justice and fairness.

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

court system operates on the origin of stare decisis (Latin for stand by things decided), which means that today’s decisions are based mainly on rulings from the past, and tomorrow’s rulings rely primarily on what is decided today. The Judicial court must still abide by its role, to interpret the law and determine if laws are constitutional. The judges and justices must consider the facts of the case, the Constitution, the relevant laws, and the courts’ own precedence when ruling on a case. Still, the court inadvertently takes into consideration external influences such as: interest groups, civilians, media, law clerks, and from local governments. Justices’ personal and political beliefs also underwrite their decision-making.

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

This function is to secure justice. The effective reply to opponents of the argument is to discuss the necessary overlap between legality and justice, as it is impossible to have a legal system without fidelity to the rule of law and formal justice. It is proper for the legal system to interpret the law in light of the correct principles of justice that countries tie to their honor. There are necessary moral constraints on the content of law. As human beings, it is simply impossible to ignore moral principles in any aspect of life and the law is not excluded from such precedence.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay I seek to examine the nature of the relationship between the national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) under Article 267 of the TFEU. The level of cooperation between both the CJEU and the national courts under the preliminary reference procedure has been an area of discussion with an array of views. In theory the relationship between both the courts is said to be a horizontal partnership, with the CJEU merely providing assistance to national judges however the reality of this is varies. If after examining their partnership we discover that it leans to a more hierarchical relationship we then must investigate how the CJEU shifted from a cooperative horizontal partnership to position as a superior court.

Read More
1721 Words | 7 Pages

While they are giving up sovereignty, they are receiving security in return. The EU aims at preventing the same destruction which plagued the twentieth century by making each nation economically reliant upon one another. The EU also extends beyond economic policy, but also border issues, as the organization has made border control and regulation virtually nonexistent. However, this does not mean that the EU has total control over the policy making of each state.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

The judicialization of politics has been around since the beginning of the European integration. According to Hirschl, judicialization of politics means relying on the judiciary in dealing with the moral and ethical issues encompassing public policies, and state affairs controversies. It has spread throughout the European Union starting at national level transcending state boundaries and continues to do so as today. “…judicialization has taken on many forms at the national and supranational levels, such as national constitutional courts declaring legislation unconstitutional, administrative courts challenging executive actions, prosecutors using the courts to topple corrupt politicians, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) asserting legal doctrines

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

Together with the Community itself (the 'primary column '), the CFSP and JHA constitute the second and third of the 'three mainstays ' of the EU. The EU is said to stand like a sanctuary on three columns: the Community; the Common Foreign and Security Policy; and co-operation in the field of Justice and Home Affairs (recast in the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam as Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters). These columns are of unequal quality. The Community (basically the supranational organizations and

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

When we think of justice we usually think of judges, which is one of the many definitions, but there are many more. With all of those, they help keep our government together. According to Montesquieu, “By virtue of the first, the prince or magistrate enacts temporary or perpetual laws, and amends or abrogates those that have been already enacted...By the third, he punishes criminals, or determines the disputes that arise between individuals. The latter we shall call the judiciary power..” ( Spirit of the Laws, 1748).

Read More
2373 Words | 10 Pages

In other words, its mission was to help with the expansion of the economy, the development of employment but also to contribute to the improvement of the standard of living of the citizens. 5. The ECSC i. Institutions Different institutions were set up by the ECSC Treaty. Indeed, it established a High Authority, an Assembly, a Council of Ministers and a Court of Justice. In order to better understand the functioning of the ECSC, it is important to understand the role of those four institutions.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

Member of the EU, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, G8 and the United Nations Security

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

The law is meant to provide justice to people. So the main advantages of the common law system is that it is consistent, adaptive, equal and independent. Consistency is achieved through the precedent as the base for the decisions, not the personal attitudes of the judges. The parties, involved in the process, are expecting that their case would be decided as the similar one, it creates certainty in getting equal justice and stability. Precedents are usually developed in the higher courts by the senior

Read More
1615 Words | 7 Pages

The European Union is a strong force to reckon with, mainly because of the vast amount of resources it controls. The EU has put in place institutions and policy-making powers to react to or shape economic conditions on the continent. The adoption of the euro and the monetary union further impart strength to this international alliance of powerful countries. Many scholars have suggested parallels between the EU and other international organizations like the UN. They claim that these organizations will make the world converge into a state much like the European Union.

Read More

More about Evaluate The Roles And Functions Of The Eu

Related Topics

Open Document