Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of standardized testing
Disadvantages of standardized tests
Pros of standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. What are some important steps in interpreting data from high stakes assessments? In order to make assessment data useful teachers must understand what information is being reported and determine if additional information is necessary to understand student performance. Specifically, for assessment results for students with disabilities, teachers would have to identify what accommodations were being used.
In some schools spending per student exceeds $10000 per year but the graduation rate is below 50 percent for example in Detroit. Detroit spends about 11100 per year on each student but only 25 percent of their student’s graduate high school. Policymakers should focus on reforming policies and resource allocations to improve student achievement. According to the National Center for Education Statistics 52 percent of public Education expenditures are spent on instruct and this percentage keeps decreasing overtime. Children who benefit from the school choice program usually have higher test scores than their peers.
en Z1791763 EPFE 321 Mid-term Over the years there have been many different views on the direction that education and schooling will take in the role of the United States society taken by influential people. Some of these people included the Puritans of the Plymouth Colony, who believed that children needed to work to prevent them from being influenced by the devil. Thomas Jefferson who believed that everyone needs to be educated for the betterment of society and that people should earn their respect and merits and that it shouldn’t be just given out for nothing. Horace Mann started to try and standardize schooling so that if children moved they would still be learning nearly the same curriculum that they had left, he also tried to further
In Should The Obama Generation Drop Out Charles Murray talks about the flaws found in the Obama education plan . He brings to the attention of the public the fact that many student in America graduate lacking the skills necessary for the proper college education. Murray goes on to argue that in today 's society students who graduate from High-school go on to technical college to pursue a vocational education in their field of study; whereas, older generations have pursued an all around education, enrolling in classes that were irrelevant to the career they were pursuing. Murray claims that if you test the vast majority of Americans (including himself) in the more rigorous subjects, they would most likely fail. Murray mentions that he does
Why give more money to something that is going to be wasted if fifty percent of the freshman class will drop out and only half will see graduation? For most of the schools Kozol visited, the dropout rate ranged from seventy-six to eighty-one percent. Poor performance was also seen as a deterrent (58). Funding was not available to establish pre-K programs to help prepare students for the classroom. As a result, almost all the high school graduates in the lower end schools read at sixth and eighth grade levels.
Currently in America, the popularity of attending college is increasing, but so are tuition costs. Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill, in their essay, Should Everyone Go to College?, refute the idea that college is a necessity to live a prosperous life. Their purpose is to inspire a change in legislation to make information on the drawbacks of college more accessible to high school students. Owen and Sawhill effectively appeal to their audience of legislators by systematically proving that college is not a necessity At the start of the essay, directly after the thesis, Owen and Sawhill immediately address a popular counter argument. They point out that a common problem with statistics about college versus high school graduates is that “the smartest most motivated people are both more likely to go to college and more likely to be financially successful”
Recently, many have begun to attack and degrade higher education in the United States. In the book How College Works, authors Daniel Chambliss and Christopher Takacs claim, “As state support has eroded, and as more students attend college in an increasingly desperate attempt to find viable jobs, the price to students of attending an institution of higher education has gone up, especially at more selective institutions” (172). So is college even worth it? Caroline Bird’s excerpt from her book Case Against College “Where College Fails Us” is an adequately written article that agrees with those who question whether college is a good investment. Bird argues that although some students would benefit from college and succeed, many fall short, wasting
Preamble Perhaps the most essential component of a successful nation is its education system. With an educated population come a more efficient and successful economy, and an overall improvement in quality of life. Despite this being true, the United States has neglected its once great education system in recent years, and has since been left behind by global education giants such as South Korea or Finland. As of 2014, American students rank barely above average in the world on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), and have been overtaken by numerous countries in the past decade with far inferior economic prowess. (Resmovits, 2014)
Higher Learning to Higher Success Countless students, teachers, and even national leaders have made the point that something has faltered in our education system. The education system in the United States has been picked apart piece by piece and scrutinized against other methods of nations. This process is repeated time and time again, always leading to a horrible truth of the failing system. Although we know something is missing, no action has been taken to mend the broken education system. The basis of this failure is the less-fortunate students who learn at a below-average level.
It is well known that education in society today is a crucial component for achieving success in the modern world. Illustrating this importance is the fact that the United Sates has made K-12 schooling mandatory for all students and even provides this education free of charge to everyone via its public school system. However, despite the fact that the intentions for our public education system are good-natured, at least on the surface, some rather critical viewpoints have developed that put into question the true motivations surrounding this type of schooling. Most notably, John Taylor Gatto, a writer and former school teacher with just about 30 years of experience in the New York public school system, provides his take on the true purposes of our educational system. He argues that, based on his considerable experience in the field, this system fails miserably to succeed in its perceived — but not at all correct — goal of producing good people and citizens that are performing at their personal best.
During the mid-century, secondary education through colleges or universities was a luxury only experienced by the wealthy. However, today many now have the choice of post-secondary schooling, whether it is a traditional university, community college, or an online program. A college education is now readily accessible, but still with a very high price tag. Because of this expensive cost, many question if a college education is worth the price. Still, college education benefits the individual greatly through live long experiences, social and community skills, personal growth, and a great monetary advantage.
Regarding an article published in Education Week, 5/7/2015, by author Marc Tucker, “Making Graduation Meaningful: A Real Qualification System for U.S. Students”, he states “A qualification system defines key gateways. Tucker believes the American education system has lower education standards and as a result our high schools are graduating lower educated students. As a graduating senior of the class of 2016, I disagree with Tuckers opinion concerning the real qualification system. Every student should be given a second chance to improve themselves, not every student test high on the first time. Students today, have a lot of pressure put upon them to succeed in life; their parents want them to have “better lives” than what they had.
Even though many students absolutely hate them, state assessments are a big part of the American education system. Everyone has taken a standardized test at some point in their life, and almost everyone has done poorly on one. They are primarily used as a measurement of how well students learn, but are they truly accurate? There are strong arguments on both sides, which has started a heated conflict about the productiveness of these tests. Standardized testing has been around for many years, starting in Imperial China where it was intended to determine a person’s aptitude for a government position (“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?”).
A rising issue in today’s society is deciding whether or not college is worth the cost. There is an extreme amount of pressure that is forced upon high school students by parents, teachers, and peers to further their education and attend college. However, there is research that challenges the thought that college is the best possible path for a person to take. College may be a great investment for some people, but it is not meant for everyone. This is supported by the arguments that colleges are expensive, jobs do not always require a college degree, and students are forced to choose a lifestyle before being exposed to the real world.
I have never done well on test and especially standardized test. In secondary school all of the test seemed very repetitive and useless. When I took those tests, they did not give me any knowledge or helped me in any way. I feel like all of those test were there and we have to take them, because that is what the school is requiring, but it doesn’t measure my knowledge. The standardized tests were very “dry” you could say and I do know that I did not look forward to them.