the park is expensive but worth it because passage one provided solid facts and how this park can benefit dog owners and their dog. the dog park can cut down the amount of dogs that get disgarded in the
By recognizing that the proposal is not a quick fix and that adding parks is costly, the author demonstrates that they are a reasonable and realistic voice in the discussion. Thus, the author contributes to the debate. The author's credibility is enhanced by their use of logos and ethos, which also contributes to the greater persuasiveness of the argument. One of the potential flaws of the article is that the author needs to consider the perspective of persons who may be opposed to the idea of bringing more parks to Dallas.
The National Park Service offers many important things to the United States. In the article, "A Monumental Fight," Katy Steinmetz states that national parks offer the use of scientific exploration, historical research, and tourism for travelers (32). Park lovers voice out that parks are a part of history and is the home for many animals. While others are arguing that the National Parks might need a cut in funds.
Dogs that get exercise have a better mental and physical health. According to American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals states dogs that dont get exercise act out by barking and destroying things at home. Bad behavior in dogs is caused by being lonely and the lack of exercise. Having a dog park will benefit both the dog and the owner.
Having public dog parks inside cities is a great idea simply because the benefits out-weigh the consequences. I believe this because a public dog park would raise property values, lower the amount of dog-bites, and create a safe pleasant area for people to let there dog run free. An argument against the dog park may be that "It would cost taxpayers too much money!" but I say not.
Why not other service animals? I disagree with the new law permits the use of dog only a other service animals in public places It says so on Service Animals by Clare Mishica Laws paragraph 1 sentence 6. Why not other service animals? Other animals can do stuff to. Also monkeys a at Helping Hands like dogs get teached.
A dog park has no place in a residential area. Now a dog park would give a dog a place to exercise and play it would be a disturbance to the residents that live close to the dog park. Not only would there be pleanty of dogs that would be barking wether that be at another dog or a starnger, it would not be the best sound to hear all day everyday. A dogs bark avereges at 75 decibles biggers dogs can bark at 100 decibles which "even through a closed window, a dogs bark can reach a noise level that is mentally upsetting". Reports/complaints about this have come from Reston,Virgina and Chandler, Arizona.
Building a dog park in neighborhoods could be many things, to include good and bad. Personally, I believe that people shouldn't have to live within areas of dog parks, as it is quite disturbing to get any peace and quiet while listening to dogs bark all day. On the other hand, it can be beneficial to those with animals. espcially in an apartment setting.
Do you have a love of dogs? If so, then you will be very interested in this essay. I have conducted some research and even though I am not a dog lover I do not feel that all the pit bulls in Texas should be banned. The pit bulls only know what their owners teach them. Texas pit bull owners need to teach them to be good.
Do you think that workplaces should allow their employess to bring their dogs with them to work? In my opinion, I believe they should be allowed to bring their k9 companions with them to work. Dogs are believed to help people experience a sense of well being, and also lower stress and anxiety. Also, I believe that dogs would make us happier in our workplaces, and help us to get more work accomplished in a shorter amount of time. There are those people who are aginst bringing their dogs with them to work.
Do you think pets should be allowed in the classroom. According to research, having a pet in the classroom should be allowed because it helps students. One reason why pets should be allowed in the classroom is because it teaches students valuable skills. Then, another reason why they should be allowed in the classroom is because they can help students learn. To begin with, The first reason why pets should be allowed in the classroom is because they teach the students valuable skills.
Some people don 't want dog parks for the reasons of other dogs attacking their dogs or kids. But a lot of behavioral issues in dogs stem from the built up energy from lack of excersise and interaction with other animals or people. People also seek out places that are animal friendly when trying to move. Dogs, especially young puppies, have a lot of energy they need to get out and require excersise. If they don 't get their energy out they can mess up the house or act out and get aggressive.
Exercise is incredibly important to a dogs mental and physical health. It is also directly correlated with a dog's behavior. Essentially, the more cooped up the dog is, the more the owner and fellow neighbors pay. Dogs that aren't let out to exercise or socialize will begin to act out through various ways, such as sudden potty training issues and barking. Not only is a dog park beneficial to the pooch and the owner, it's also beneficial to the city.
From walking your dog, to playing with your kids, the park is the perfect place for endless outdoor activities and events. The park is a door to escape the harshness of the world and return to reality with a new mind set on the world. Most public parks offer amazing sceneries of nature from plants and trees to wildlife. The presence of nature warms my heart bringing relaxation and peace upon my body and
Stance: The Government should develop country parks for housing purpose After investigating on different advantages and disadvantages of the government developing country parks for housing purpose, with reference to the parameters based on the coverage and the effectiveness of the development, the Hong Kong Government should develop country parks for housing purposes. Those parameters should be considered as the development of country parks can benefit a large group of people and the effectiveness can be measured by the ease of development. Parameter 1: Effectiveness
