Dog park Essays

my opinion dog parks would possibly be a good and bad idea. Both people have good and reasonable reasons on why there should and should not be dog parks. But in my opinion dog parks would be a good decison because that would create less havoc at public parks where children could possibly be injured or frieghtend from dogs loose at a normal park. Having a dog park would also allow dog owners to be able to keep track of their dogs without the dog being able to runaway. Also, if dog parks really do better

of both of the articals I read I strongly believe dog parks should be avalible to residents in large cities. Dog parks can be a big benifit to larger cites that are unable to proved housing with there own lot. Some houses don't proved much out door space due to houses being closely built and usely in a group. The second artical i read "No Dog Park for Muscatine" made some intresting points on there beliefe of dog parks. For instince barking dogs can cause stress and dis confort to surrounding residents

Dog parks can be very benificial, for both dog owners and dogs. With dog parks, the dogs can run around without a leash, while the dog owners can sit and socialize with other dog lovers like themselves. Dogs can also get the excerise they need, in more ways than just being walked down a street. Plus in cities like Muscatine, Iowa, where the majority of rental units are apartments, a dog park is the best solution. Due to apartments not being able to have a lot of yard space, dogs don't get the necessary

our in desperate need of a dog parks. Because living in a big city, or in a area that does not provide a big enough space, rather it is a public park or a large back yard allowing a dog to run free and exercise. Also with some cities making it illegal were you cannot allow your dog to be off the leash unless you are in a enclosed and safe enviroment. Exercise is vary important to a dogs mental and physical health. Also it does say that having a open area were a dog can run free and play, has

In my opinion the building of dog parks in neighborhoods is a great idea for the community due to the fact that many Americans own an animal. I have a knowledge of this because an apartment complex I use to reside had a rule restricting home owners of letting any animal defecate or urinate outside. We had to take the dog and give him up for adoption because we didnt want to be kicked from the complex. Building the dog park will benefit many animals and relieve some stress from people that also live

No Dog Park In Residential Dogs are not a nusence, but a dog park in a residential area of the city is not the right choice. A dog park can cause problems for people living around the dog park. And a lack of responsibility from dog owners would not help the burdon of a residential located dog park. Not to mention the means of who is going to pay for the contruction and to maintain the park, the taxpayers. A dog park has no place in a residential area. Now a dog park would give a dog a

Building a dog park in neighborhoods could be many things, to include good and bad. Personally, I believe that people shouldn't have to live within areas of dog parks, as it is quite disturbing to get any peace and quiet while listening to dogs bark all day. On the other hand, it can be beneficial to those with animals. espcially in an apartment setting. In the first statement, the writer goes on to argue that dogs need excercise in order to function properly, as do humans. That without the proper

I believe dog parks are a great idea for people that live in the city. There are so many people that own a dog in crowded city areas. With leash laws ,and just simply not having the space many dogs don't get the exercise they need. Dog parks are not only great for the dogs they benefit the owners also. The dogs and the owner will be getting exercise that they need to be healthy. Studies allow us to see the change in a dogs behavior , once off-leash dog parks started. Dog-bite reports dropped

will discuss the different reasons why a dog park should and should not be built in the city. Some people, believe that dogs do not get enough exerise when living in an apartment complex. Rental units house 68% of city residents. A quarter of this percent is apartment buildings. Some people believe that having a dog park, is a burden and a lawsuit waitint to happen. People in favor of having a dog park believes exercise is important to dogs. It is important to their mental and physical

complain for their dog at home from other apartment building , they need for dog park. As i support this idea, i dog park is needed for everyone who loves dog. Dogs ar very faithful animal. Human loves dog but somethimes who lives in apartment building have not get space much for their dogs. People often go to park for exercise and those time they can put their dog in dog park. It 's also benefinial for human because in dog park dog is secure and more comfortable with other dogs. If they make a good

MY OPINION ON DOG PARKS IN CITIES Dog parks are a great idea for all cities.Dog bites will go down.Property value would increase.Rules should be put in place to respct the part of the community that is against it and to insure the dog park is safe.A community vote should take place just to make it fair to build a dog park. Dog parks in the city are a great idea for everyone who owns a dog.According to the (ASPCA) a dog that does not get enough exercise is more likely

No Dog Park! After reading both of the passages "A Dog Park Benenefits all" and "No Dog Park For Muscatine". i have came to the conclusion that Dog parks shouldnt be allowed in the city or atleast not near residential areas. In my opinion, the reason why i don 't agree with a Dog park is because to me Dogs can be very dangerous. I lived in a neirghborhood where the neighbor had so much dogs!, mean dogs. One day one of the dogs scaped while i was on my bike, i jumped out!, and ran

't want dog parks for the reasons of other dogs attacking their dogs or kids. But a lot of behavioral issues in dogs stem from the built up energy from lack of excersise and interaction with other animals or people. People also seek out places that are animal friendly when trying to move. Dogs, especially young puppies, have a lot of energy they need to get out and require excersise. If they don 't get their energy out they can mess up the house or act out and get aggressive. A dog park would give

Dog parks good or bad? Residents of this particular city say, the city should build a dog park in their locaton. The residents believe there isnt enough space for excersize for their pet. Also because it is against city ordinance for dogs to be off-leash in public areas the dogs in the city can not play freely. The dogs are forced to play in a small yard with little to no privacy. Others who object to the dog park idea states, it would be a burden for taxpayers and a lawsuit waiting

Dog parks in city limits would be a great idea, in my opinion. For many reasons, I do believe that having dog parks within the city limits would benefit all K9 owners who care about the mental and physical health of their dog(s). I being a dog owner myself, and knowing the behaviors and patterns of my fur babies. The article states that, "According to the ASPCA, dogs that don't get the proper excercise can act out by barking and destroying things at home...", being a victim to this myself I have

is much discussion on the topic of dog parks. To begin with, dog parks are benefical for not only dogs themselves, but for the community as a whole. Allowing dogs to get perhaps daily - or even weekly exercise can drastically improve a dogs health, along with aiding in behavioral issues. Some might say a dog park is a burden, perhaps too much money - but dog poop in your yard from a dog that 's not your own, can be a burden as well. Starting off, keeping a dog, or any animal cooped up for long periods

Muscatine for the Dog Park A dog park would benefit the City of Muscatine. Not only for the pet owners, but property owners in the surrounding area due to a property value increase. So any small percentage of taxes taken out of your paycheck to fund the dog park would eventually come back as a greater payoff when selling their home for said property owner. As for noise complaints, the majority of the people using the dog park would be apartment residents. Why does that matter? Well, due to the

Proposal 4 October 2015 Aggression in the Dog Park 2,358 people in Arizona required hospital care between 2008 and 2012 due to dog bites. Between these two years, Arizona spent approximately 55 million dollars on health care for these dog bite occurrences. (Tang, Terry) Dog bites occur when aggressive dogs enter dog parks, a dog is provoked, or two dogs are fighting over something. The attacks that are present in most articles are typically of aggressive dogs targeting other animals. It is not

Dogs are a common and unique animal. They are full of energy, comforting and easy to get along with. However dogs can be a huge responsibility. Dogs require attention, care and time. Regardless if a dog park should be built or not their will be a price to be paid by both dog owners and non-owners. The question is which are you willing to pay? I believe that a dog park would be a good investment by tax payers within each cities. A dog park is a place where a dog can both play and get exercise. This

in this dog park was when I first came here,” says a young female named Michelle as she is remembering what happened in that day with her small dog named Princess,” I couldn’t get my dog to drink the water from the water bowls in the park. The dogs put their muddy toys in the water bowls. She refused to drink from the water bowls. She waited until we went home.” Michelle was smiling while describing her first experience at the Alameda Dog Park in Oakland. Parks like the Alameda Dog Park are excellent