ipl-logo

Fast Entertainment And Multitasking In An Always-On World Analysis

670 Words3 Pages

Is having “Fast Entertainment” a disadvantage to one’s life? Ever since its creation in 1983, the Internet has improved in astounding numbers; new technology has made it very easy to access the Internet, thanks to tech experts and computer scientists. In the article, “Fast Entertainment and Multitasking in an Always-On World” S. Craig Watkins, describes to the reader how quick access to the Internet affects people’s lives. He compares the use of the Internet with the consumption of candy and “snack culture”. Furthermore, Watkins explains the negative psychological effects of multitasking. The article, “Fast Entertainment and Multitasking in an Always-On World” is about the meaning of “snack culture” and the negative effects of multitasking. …show more content…

It seems like an innocent habit, but it actually has a negative effect on one’s productivity and concentration on their assignment. For instance, Watkins says, “In an age of multiplying screens, constant connections, and content overload… human suffer severe lapses in attention” (Watkins 150). The quick access of the Internet makes people try to expand their attention to everything. When we multitask, we shift our attention to multiple tasks, which means our mind is not capable of processing two different types of information at once. Moreover, Watkins describes the result of a scientific study of the brain’s ability to handle multitasking. For example, “Continuous partial attention, or CPA… contributes to a feeling of [being overwhelmed], over-stimulation and to a sense of being unfulfilled,” (Watkins 150). People can’t be productive if they’re constantly distracted and feeling empty. People have the ‘necessity’ to pile their screens with as much information as humanly possible to simultaneously work on their assignments, which lowers their productivity. An example is watching television and working on math homework; our mind shifts from the TV monitor to one’s homework and can’t put 100% of attention in

Show More
Related
166 Words | 1 Pages

According to the prominent pathologist Bruce Friedman, admitted, “I’ve lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb. I skim it.” Carr cites a few studies of internet behavior that is influencing our brain to lack concentration. He proves

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Summary of Addicted to Distraction In Tony Schwartz’s article Addicted to Distraction, originally published in The New York Times on November 28, 2015, he explains through his personal experience that Internet Addiction, a common phenomenon in modern day society, interrupts people’s brain and divides their attention in order to receive and absorb intriguing information online, which as a result, distracts people from their work and daily lives and hinders their ability of processing useful information into long-term memory. Schwartz begins the article with his personal anecdote that how he suddenly realizes the significant amount of time he has spent online deteriorates his reading habit and causes lack of concentration unconsciously while reading. To demonstrate that addiction to the Internet does interfere with people’s lives remarkably, Schwartz refers to the ideas from Nicolas Carr

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

Watkins reveals that one study has found that multitasking actually often slows down productivity. Throughout his argument he tends to use a lot of analogies along with a few cases of logos and historical evidence with an informative and persuasive tone. Watkins uses many analogies, logos, and historical evidence to explain how the “Snack Culture” of our society often leads to multitasking between devices and harmful side effects. Watkins ' first point is that our world is filled with digital media that can be obtained nearly instantly. He often compares this fast entertainment to fast food, “Like fast food, fast entertainment is easy to get, all around us, and typically cheap, but not always good for you.

Read More
1099 Words | 5 Pages

Multitasking has all negative effects on the human body and brain. It has affected attention span because the brain is not focusing on just one thing but then is constantly switching between whatever people are multitasking with. People also are less productive as a result of multitasking. When someone is less productive it means that they cannot focus for long periods of time. So while not only has technology been bad for attention span, it has also been bad for the everyday health of humans.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

I made a personal connection with this because I used to always say "I can multi task, it's easy for me to be on my phone while doing my homework", but that’s not the case. When you multi task you're not doing two things at a time you're just shifting your attention on different things. Honestly that’s what always happened to me when it came down to being on my phone and being distracted about what's going on twitter. People that tend to multi task have a hard time focusing on things that are

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

With an abundant amount of internet usage, studies show the development of implications in our brain such as short-term attention spans and scattered thinking. When we work online, our brains are constantly pressured to take in vast amounts of information. Think about when you are reading an article on the internet and then all of the sudden that really interesting ad pops up, you just totally forgot about what you're reading. “We are becoming mere signal-processing units, quickly shepherding disjointed bits of information into and then out of short-term memory” Carr explains that the internet is considerably reducing our ability to concentrate which is developing scattered thinking. Continually being exposed to these things are negatively affecting the way we process and interpret the information we are obtaining through the

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

The article I read published in 2008 called “Multitasking Can Make You Lose… Um… Focus” by Alina Tugend called talks about the advantages and disadvantages of multitasking. The author Alina Tugend informs us on how this era has become dependent on multitasking since 1990’s, and ever since then multitasking has become a part of our lives. She also states that multitasking isn’t beneficial, and it just puts us under a lot of stress, causing anxiety making us less efficient when doing more than one activity at a time. Tugend elaborates on how it is just an illusion that multitasking helps us do different things simultaneously when in reality we are just losing focus. A lot of us believe that we are working on something else at the same time

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

This week in Composition II, we evaluated an article about the effects of multitasking. The article, Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus, written by Alina Tugend was published in the New York Times in 2008, and contemplates the positive and negative aspects of multitasking. Although multitasking is essential in 21st century life, studies have shown that multitasking can make you less effective. In Chapter 7, we have looked at the mental capacity of our brains, and what our brains are capable of. This chapter included multitasking, and Tugend shares very similar views to those of Morris and Maisto.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

People nowadays in today’s world are addicted to watching every episode on tv, and always having a phone in our hand so that we can check out the newest update or instagram post. Our society, just as Brave New Worlds, is addicted to the newest technology and always being

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

A very vast amount of information can now be accessed at the press of a button, but this digital version can at times be harder to comprehend. According to a 2020 update to The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains, Nicholas Carr, an acclaimed writer whose work focuses on technology, economics, and culture, dictates that “When the brain is overloaded by stimuli, as it usually is when we’re peering into a network-connected computer screen, attention splinters, thinking becomes superficial, and memory suffers,” (Pro 2 2). If attention and memory become weaker, more stress is placed on the mind, and being subjected to prolonged periods of stress can cause damage to the mind. When an amount of input that is too great to register is received into the mind, cognitive thinking weakens and the effectiveness of understanding and retaining information becomes debilitated. The internet initiates exposure to a wide variety of information, which can impair one’s

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

“The Good, the Bad, the Ugly”, makes the argument that technology , “makes life extraordinarily easier. Banking, shopping, and direct communication with other individuals and businesses are all simpler and faster.” Of course as a teenager in today's society I can see the impact the internet has on my generation, but as far as the rest of our society goes I can’t fully vouch for that. I think in this case that two things can be true at the same time. Entertainment can be engaging and educational, but it can also be damaging and destructive.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Zryan Ibrahim Mr. Jonathan Writing 4 – 01 December 16, 2014 Rough Draft of the Internet Addiction The development of the Internet refers to many years of studies that done by technologists. The innovation includes facilities for humans in their careers.

Read More
615 Words | 3 Pages

I get very distracted, I often have to stop whatever I’m doing and just day dream or I get lost in my phone. I also learned I shouldn't write multiple essays at once with the television on, that only blocks my creativity. The brain, like any other muscle, can get taxed due to multitasking switching between tasks and making multiple decisions might tire your brain to an expanse that a person might end up being a poor or less-effective decision maker. Multitasking can be a waste of time, and multitasking increases one stress levels, and anxiety.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

The American family once dropped everything that they were doing to attend the infamous baseball game. Baseball was the hub of culture, children traded cards with players on them, adults were constantly discussing the game, and the players were the Kardasians of their time. These days, a family splits into separate rooms and huddles in front of their respective televisions to watch their favorite show. The ability to stream virtually every show and movie with the click of a button has resulted in a new form of viewing referred to as “binge watching.” The effects of binge watching are obvious with every viewer suffering from the same problems after an indulgence.

Read More
1542 Words | 7 Pages

Jordan Grafman, neuroscientist and chief of the cognitive neuroscience section at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke or NINDS, stated that “kids that are instant messaging while doing homework, playing games online and watching TV, I predict, aren’t going to do well in the long run.” Grafman has conducted decades of research that demonstrate “that the quality of one’s output and depth of thought deteriorate as one attends to ever more tasks,” (Wallis, 2006). Donald Roberts, a professor of communication at Stanford, noted that students “can’t go the few minutes between their 10 o’clock and 11 o’clock classes without talking on their cell phones. It seems to me that there’s almost a discomfort with not being stimulated--a kind of ’I can’t stand the silence.’” Grafman explains that it’s not actually multitasking, but really “you’re doing more than one thing, but you’re ordering them and deciding which one to do at any one time,” therefore not

Read More

More about Fast Entertainment And Multitasking In An Always-On World Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document